Search

Notices

This thing is a NO!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-03-2018, 09:54 PM
  #141  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 23
Default

Originally Posted by Green Giant
Got a 30 hour layover in LAX.......Nope now you go to FLL for a Managua Red Eye after 10 hours of rest. ................ummmm
Easy. Do Not Answer Your Phone. And if they get you via acars or at the jetway, just remember, fatigue calls will be paid by the company, not your sick bank.
punchdrunk is offline  
Old 02-04-2018, 03:46 AM
  #142  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 409
Default

Originally Posted by punchdrunk
Easy. Do Not Answer Your Phone. And if they get you via acars or at the jetway, just remember, fatigue calls will be paid by the company, not your sick bank.
Technically only if decided by the committee but you are right. We have a bunch of drama queens here. The re-scheduling is the least of my concerns.
UNSUBSCRIBE is offline  
Old 02-04-2018, 04:45 AM
  #143  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 127
Default

Originally Posted by UNSUBSCRIBE
Technically only if decided by the committee but you are right. We have a bunch of drama queens here. The re-scheduling is the least of my concerns.
Hhahahhaha awesome!
NKSMCOTAKEOVER is offline  
Old 02-04-2018, 04:54 AM
  #144  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 193
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
Passing this and having your job outsourced would be worse.

We aren’t even getting block or better on a leg by leg basis. I mean, really?
I just have to ask, why do you think if it doesn’t pass our jobs are safe while we are bargaining for who knows how long?
Conquistador27 is offline  
Old 02-04-2018, 05:12 AM
  #145  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Default

Originally Posted by Conquistador27
I just have to ask, why do you think if it doesn’t pass our jobs are safe while we are bargaining for who knows how long?
They aren’t but id prefer to actively be negotiating solid scope as opposed to waiting 5++ years while Spirit actively try’s to outsource my job which could alreay be in their long term plan but they haven’t gotten to that point yet. Only they know. The fact that they wanted these holes left open leads me to believe that they have something planned for the future
Qotsaautopilot is offline  
Old 02-04-2018, 05:21 AM
  #146  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lincoln Osiris's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Position: NK CA
Posts: 838
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
They aren’t but id prefer to actively be negotiating solid scope as opposed to waiting 5++ years while Spirit actively try’s to outsource my job which could alreay be in their long term plan but they haven’t gotten to that point yet. Only they know. The fact that they wanted these holes left open leads me to believe that they have something planned for the future
What section does it say they can outsource all of our flying?
Lincoln Osiris is online now  
Old 02-04-2018, 05:28 AM
  #147  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Default

Originally Posted by Lincoln Osiris
What section does it say they can outsource all of our flying?
It doesn’t have to say they can it has to say they cannot and it doesn’t. Assume you are our sleezy Management and you want to outsource the pilots when it suits you. Now read our section 1 both current and TA and ask yourself how you do it. I’m sure you can figure out a way.

You do remember that Bendo outsourced all of our airport personnel letterally overnight right? People in dtw, acy, myr that had decades with the company.

You do remember Bendo hired, trained, and staged scab mechanics at northwest prior to the mx strike?

Learn from history. They want contractors for everything so they can whipsaw them every year for the lowest price.
Qotsaautopilot is offline  
Old 02-04-2018, 05:33 AM
  #148  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lincoln Osiris's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Position: NK CA
Posts: 838
Default

2. Notwithstanding Section 1.B.1. above, the Company may assign or contract out revenue flying for a period not in excess of ninety (90) days per occurrence if (a) such conduct is necessary to accomplish the needs of the service of the Company, and (b) the Company does not have sufficient aircraft or pilots to perform the revenue flying assigned or contracted out, and (c) no Company pilot is furloughed as a result of such contracting out of revenue flying. The Company shall provide notice to the Association prior to entering any agreement to assign or contract out revenue flying.
Lincoln Osiris is online now  
Old 02-04-2018, 06:10 AM
  #149  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Default

Originally Posted by Lincoln Osiris
2. Notwithstanding Section 1.B.1. above, the Company may assign or contract out revenue flying for a period not in excess of ninety (90) days per occurrence if (a) such conduct is necessary to accomplish the needs of the service of the Company, and (b) the Company does not have sufficient aircraft or pilots to perform the revenue flying assigned or contracted out, and (c) no Company pilot is furloughed as a result of such contracting out of revenue flying. The Company shall provide notice to the Association prior to entering any agreement to assign or contract out revenue flying.
They can buy a regional or foreign carrier and we lose all protection. I’d buy both.

Codesharing protections: do you want the company to grow without us and then whipsaw us in future negotiations under the threat of more codesharing if we don’t agree to concessions?

If been up and down with you on scope in several threads if you don’t think Bendo will try to eliminate us at some point I think you are blinded by the bonus you’ve probably already spent. Just vote yes then. I’m not. I want this risk shut down completely
Qotsaautopilot is offline  
Old 02-04-2018, 06:37 AM
  #150  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lincoln Osiris's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Position: NK CA
Posts: 838
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
They can buy a regional or foreign carrier and we lose all protection. I’d buy both.

Codesharing protections: do you want the company to grow without us and then whipsaw us in future negotiations under the threat of more codesharing if we don’t agree to concessions?

If been up and down with you on scope in several threads if you don’t think Bendo will try to eliminate us at some point I think you are blinded by the bonus you’ve probably already spent. Just vote yes then. I’m not. I want this risk shut down completely
Now I’m confused or maybe you are just making up more crap that I have to shut you down on. But where in the hell does it say that if the company buys a regional or another carrier we lose all protections???
Lincoln Osiris is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EWR73FO
United
3
09-26-2012 04:21 PM
bulldog3
Foreign
1
06-20-2008 12:47 PM
АЕРОФЛОТ 214
Regional
28
04-08-2007 08:12 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices