Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Spirit
What exactly is "industry Standard Scope" >

What exactly is "industry Standard Scope"

Search

Notices

What exactly is "industry Standard Scope"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-23-2018, 10:12 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Deathwish's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 270
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
I’m glad you read it but why now? Where have you been the last three years? Contract isn’t worth the paper it’s on if your job can be outsourced.

No furlough means you won’t lose your job now but all growth can be outsourced until they shrink the current list out of existence through retirements slowly. That will obviously take forever but every future negotiation will be drug out forever as we lose more and more leverage because we are whipsawed against the outsourcing.

I’m not saying this will happen but it can and we need to nip it now. The argument will be that there is no money to be made in codesharing. If that is so why do airlines do it? And if there is no money then why not give us southwest scope for free. And if there is money we need comprehensive restrictions that protect our growth and future while also sharing in the wealth (profit sharing).
You put in a good effort trying to convince Dracula over in F9 of scope importance.... can’t blame you for walking out of there.
Deathwish is offline  
Old 01-24-2018, 05:45 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tranquility's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: Da Bus, Left
Posts: 1,564
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
I’m glad you read it but why now? Where have you been the last three years? Contract isn’t worth the paper it’s on if your job can be outsourced.
Really? Get off your high horse already. There’s sooooooo much I can do right now with section 1 and how if affects my daily life as a pilot.

Miami Air perked my interest earlier last year, but I wanted to reread the whole thing to have some basis for comparison when the TA gets rolled out.
Tranquility is online now  
Old 01-24-2018, 06:14 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
flyguyniner11's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 765
Default

Originally Posted by Tranquility
Really? Get off your high horse already. There’s sooooooo much I can do right now with section 1 and how if affects my daily life as a pilot.

Miami Air perked my interest earlier last year, but I wanted to reread the whole thing to have some basis for comparison when the TA gets rolled out.
It’s really not a bad idea to make yourself more familiar with the current contract to compare with the upcoming TA.
flyguyniner11 is offline  
Old 01-24-2018, 06:32 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Default

Originally Posted by Tranquility
Really? Get off your high horse already. There’s sooooooo much I can do right now with section 1 and how if affects my daily life as a pilot.

Miami Air perked my interest earlier last year, but I wanted to reread the whole thing to have some basis for comparison when the TA gets rolled out.

Hey I’m glad you read it. I was just hoping that when everyone was filling out their surveys over the last few years that they we educated on what we had and what we needed. You never know if the offer is good if you don’t know what you currently have.

It’s not a high horse. The contract is required reading right after IOE imo
Qotsaautopilot is offline  
Old 01-24-2018, 07:40 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tranquility's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: Da Bus, Left
Posts: 1,564
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
Hey I’m glad you read it. I was just hoping that when everyone was filling out their surveys over the last few years that they we educated on what we had and what we needed. You never know if the offer is good if you don’t know what you currently have.

It’s not a high horse. The contract is required reading right after IOE imo
Fair enough. In my surveys I definitely expressed the concern for stronger scope language, however, I was more concerned with the merger language and not codeshare. Just wasn’t on my radar at the time. I did not read section 1 right after OE.... I was more concerned with sections 3, 12, and 25.
Tranquility is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
el jefe
Regional
33
08-28-2007 04:23 AM
ProfessorJoeVee
Major
68
05-23-2007 01:30 PM
nwa757
Money Talk
8
03-13-2007 08:04 AM
Carlos Abundis
Cargo
18
12-16-2006 12:57 PM
BURflyer
Regional
46
04-29-2006 10:19 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices