Search

Notices

Hello PBS; Goodbye QOL

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-29-2017, 04:10 AM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 316
Default

Originally Posted by Lincoln Osiris
Actually almost half of Spirits Q3 total operating revenues are from not ticket sales. So you do have to take that into account.

UPDATE: Went and did some digging and saw that for the Q3 reports for example Southwest had a CASM (operating cost per available seat mile) of 11.36 (cents) and Delta had a operating cost of 12.61 cents (mainline only). While Spirit "HA" was only at 5.42 cents cost per available seat mile. But they can't afford to pay us right? haha kiss my ass Fornaro. Go back and try to run Air Tran into the ground again or something.
Take non ticket sales revenue into account for what?

Looking at costs alone is irrelevant. That’s what I’m trying to say.
If everyone had a 20%ish margin. Then NK’s revenue was only 6.77cents with cost of 5.42 while and Delta’s was 15.75/12.621 respectively.

I don’t actually have the real numbers. But was hoping someone on here did so an accurate assessment can be made.
Feng is offline  
Old 10-29-2017, 04:39 AM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 316
Default

Originally Posted by Lincoln Osiris
Actually almost half of Spirits Q3 total operating revenues are from not ticket sales. So you do have to take that into account.

UPDATE: Went and did some digging and saw that for the Q3 reports for example Southwest had a CASM (operating cost per available seat mile) of 11.36 (cents) and Delta had a operating cost of 12.61 cents (mainline only). While Spirit "HA" was only at 5.42 cents cost per available seat mile. But they can't afford to pay us right? haha kiss my ass Fornaro. Go back and try to run Air Tran into the ground again or something.
Don't know where you dug but here are the numbers for NK and DAL 3 months ending in 9/30.

NK CASM/TRASM 7.59/8.95
DAL CASM/TRASM 13.14/15.76

while DAL's costs were almost doubled that of NK's, so was their revenue. What conclusion does this lead you to?

But oh wait, the union said legacy pay at spirit will only increase CASM by a couple pennies. Wondered if the mediator believed that.
Feng is offline  
Old 10-29-2017, 05:20 AM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Chimpy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,542
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
This was not the Alpa proposal. It was the company proposal to include pbs. If that was the Alpa proposal we would have much much bigger problems
As far as Payrates I meant. The ALPA proposed payrate for a 5th year CA Was like $200 +/- a fee bucks.
Chimpy is offline  
Old 10-29-2017, 06:47 AM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 323
Default

Originally Posted by Feng

You can hardly expect NK to pay legacy wages when each flight generate less revenue than a non-Ultra discount product.
You can when they keep more of that revenue than legacies do. Put it another way: which sandwich is more profitable, one that sells for $7 with a $2 profit or one that sells for $79.95 with only a 80c profit? I'm exaggerating, but you get the point.
flyboyike is offline  
Old 10-29-2017, 06:57 AM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 227
Default

Originally Posted by Feng
Don't know where you dug but here are the numbers for NK and DAL 3 months ending in 9/30.

NK CASM/TRASM 7.59/8.95
DAL CASM/TRASM 13.14/15.76

while DAL's costs were almost doubled that of NK's, so was their revenue. What conclusion does this lead you to?

But oh wait, the union said legacy pay at spirit will only increase CASM by a couple pennies. Wondered if the mediator believed that.
Either way, with industry standard pilot pay we would still have industry leading CASM. It is not our job to subsidize the company’s inability to produce revenue. We (the pilots) already play a big part in covering the mismanagement of this place. They just flat out suck at running an airline.

In addition, we aren’t just comparing ourselves to Delta. What is the RASM/TRASM at United?
Planepirate is offline  
Old 10-29-2017, 07:25 AM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: CA
Posts: 1,232
Default

Went from line bidding at my regional to PBS at JB. Even with our so-so work rules I much prefer PBS to divvy up pairings.
Softpayman is offline  
Old 10-29-2017, 07:49 AM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 316
Default

Originally Posted by Planepirate
Either way, with industry standard pilot pay we would still have industry leading CASM. It is not our job to subsidize the company’s inability to produce revenue. We (the pilots) already play a big part in covering the mismanagement of this place. They just flat out suck at running an airline.

In addition, we aren’t just comparing ourselves to Delta. What is the RASM/TRASM at United?
I don’t know, why don’t you do the math.

What does industry leading CASM mean? How do you know? Put up some numbers instead of saying because the union said so. Add up what an industry standard contract cost additionally per year and subtract it from the balance sheet and see how it affect the numbers. FYI I think 3rd quarter to date, NK made 170m profit. Apparently everyone thinks they’re underpaid by 100K/yr. Based on 1700 pilots, that’s 170m, wiping out all profit for the year so far (well not all because those would be accounted for pre tax)

What do you mean company’s inability to produce revenue? Your company’s producing plenty of revenue for what it is. It’s an ULCC, it’s a low revenue / low cost business. It’s like motel 6 has a revenue problem because the hotel doesn’t take in as much as a Sheraton and such.
Feng is offline  
Old 10-29-2017, 10:03 AM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Default

Originally Posted by Softpayman
Went from line bidding at my regional to PBS at JB. Even with our so-so work rules I much prefer PBS to divvy up pairings.
Do you prefer being at much lower relative seniority than you would be with line bidding? Which means: closer to furlough, further from upgrade, further from your base of choice, further from your vacation week of choice, further from having a holiday off, further from having weekends off, closer to being displaced, slower career progression, more stagnation in a no growth time, slower advancement in a growth time.

Ever been one seniority number away from any of the items above for a period of years? Would being on the other side of that equation for those years have changed your life for better or worse? Saved or ended your marriage? Pbs or line bidding would mean the difference no matter what work rules you have. No management switches to pbs without a change in staffing. The work rules just dictate by how much.

Pbs is a staffing reduction plain and simple. It’s either priceless and not for sale, or you’re willing to accept the above repricussions that you personally may not even feel the effects from for 5, 10, or 20 years. If that’s the case then you get absolute iron clad work rules that are important to you (they will be violated anyway, can we remember a year of all red rsv grids while we waited for arbitration) and a sum of money that is so comically large you chuckle when you get your checks. Only we decide how that goes. Let’s not be wrong.
Qotsaautopilot is offline  
Old 10-29-2017, 10:10 AM
  #69  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Position: A-320 FO
Posts: 32
Default

[QUOTE=ZapBrannigan;2456100]
Originally Posted by Grizzle


Can you elaborate?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Just my opinion,but being able just to drop a trip if there was reserve coverage was great. During monthly transition they couldn't remove days from the middle of pairings they had to remove from the beginning or the end. They also have to pay you for the trips that were dropped, and the five days off, reducible to four, between pairings. SWA has great QOL too but I thought Spirits was a little better. Just how I feel. I'm sure there are people out there that feel the opposite.
Grizzle is offline  
Old 10-29-2017, 11:05 AM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 316
Default

Originally Posted by flyboyike
You can when they keep more of that revenue than legacies do. Put it another way: which sandwich is more profitable, one that sells for $7 with a $2 profit or one that sells for $79.95 with only a 80c profit? I'm exaggerating, but you get the point.

I like your example, except the numbers goes something like this.

Sandwich man at NK discount sandwiches sells sandwiches for $9, it cost him $5.60/sandwich. For every sandwich, he pays himself $2 and reinvest $1.40 back to his business

DALe’s sandwiches sells $16 sandwiches that cost him $9.50, with each sale he pays himself $4 and reinvest $2.50 back into his business.

They get paid per sandwich and each sells the same fixed number of sandwiches a year.

Can Ned pay himself $4 without selling a different kind of sandwich?Can’t raise the prices much because it’s a pretty crappy sandwich.
Feng is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Future Cpt Kirk
Trans States Airlines
1873
12-06-2019 04:22 AM
KODI3
Southwest
2562
11-29-2016 03:42 PM
gzsg
Delta
100
09-06-2016 12:11 PM
CaptainCarl
Trans States Airlines
10900
12-31-2015 11:54 AM
HercMasterJ
FedEx
29
10-05-2015 03:22 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices