Search

Notices

Hello PBS; Goodbye QOL

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-28-2017, 08:42 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 641
Default

Originally Posted by Name User
Look at it from the mediators point of view. You guys want to keep your line bidding, work rules etc but are asking for legacy pay.

You need to take the good with the (perceived) bad if you want to match legacy pay. Or remain in perpetual negotiations.
So are we supposed to be "clones"of every airline? If NK controlled the keys to PBS then maybe they would vote it in? Point that out to the mediator! The reality is that the NK's and F9's do not control anything. Management wants everything! That is what I see the difference between the legacies and us are. If NK had the PBS rules like DAL then maybe they would consider it.

Good luck NK. We are behind you at F9!
Bolo is offline  
Old 10-28-2017, 08:55 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 227
Default

Originally Posted by LloydBraun
Nailed it. Look at the flight attendants. That will be our life with no work rules. 13 days off a month will be the norm.
Our FAs have line bidding.
Planepirate is offline  
Old 10-28-2017, 09:32 AM
  #43  
captain scarlet
 
astral's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: Who needs to know?
Posts: 170
Default

The company trolls are posting about legacy rates...
while management's offer was barely JetBlue.
In actual net, their "offer" equates to less than a 20% raise.
Productivity gained by PBS alone is at min in the high teens.

PBS is a 100 page LOA in itself.
Presently not enough information has been presented, to vote on.
Dozens of scheduling committee volunteers will be required to oversee the implementation of monthly PBS.
NCCs will be off the charts. Fly and grieve it, will become the norm.
In the red/green and middle reserve day drop grievances, the company deliberately violated black and white CBA provisions.
They will have a field day with PBS!

Bye bye open time.
Every provision they are after reduces open time.
RES drop is imperative and non negotiable.
It affects the entire group, not only reserves.
Without RES drops, planning gains total control of open time.

To the argument that we did not come here with legacy expectations:
Refer back to this forum from 2011 to 2014, when morale was positive.
Everyone expected pay to coincide with the record breaking earnings.

This misinformation of lowering expectations game, is the oldest play in the book, WE DO NOT fall for it.
We will be patient and match their ugly tactics, or fall for the same old lies, during the TRO and last three summers.
We will not be undervalued!
UNITED WE STAND.
astral is offline  
Old 10-28-2017, 10:47 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,932
Default

Has the union shared what their pay rate proposal is?

AS/VX pay proposal was a little bit below Delta. It’s being realistic. If your pay proposal matches what Delta has, while maintaining your line bidding advantages over Delta’s PBS, that is being unreasonable in front of a mediator. You can ask for “industry standard” pay, but keep in mind industry standard already means PBS in place that sees pre-assigned activities. No touch vacation, month transition, or training. That cost is already included in those rates. You can’t really expect to double dip those pay rates with your line bid advantages.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 10-28-2017, 11:37 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Chimpy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,542
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Has the union shared what their pay rate proposal is?

AS/VX pay proposal was a little bit below Delta. It’s being realistic. If your pay proposal matches what Delta has, while maintaining your line bidding advantages over Delta’s PBS, that is being unreasonable in front of a mediator. You can ask for “industry standard” pay, but keep in mind industry standard already means PBS in place that sees pre-assigned activities. No touch vacation, month transition, or training. That cost is already included in those rates. You can’t really expect to double dip those pay rates with your line bid advantages.
Not even close. With keeping line bidding as a 5th year CA the Unions Proposal was $202.00

This was also with 11% DC, not 16% and ZERO Profit Sharing and yet the mediator still thinks we are being unreasonable


Hows that for a swift kick in the face eh?
Chimpy is offline  
Old 10-28-2017, 12:07 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,932
Default

Originally Posted by Chimpy
Not even close. With keeping line bidding as a 5th year CA the Unions Proposal was $202.00

This was also with 11% DC, not 16% and ZERO Profit Sharing and yet the mediator still thinks we are being unreasonable


Hows that for a swift kick in the face eh?
Wait, that’s the ALPA proposal or the company proposal?! If that’s the ALPA proposal, why the $&@? haven’t they accepted that? That’s actually very generous as it is, should be an even higher ask. Ours comes out on Monday, hopefully that gets the comparison equation to change for the positive in pattern bargaining.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 10-28-2017, 03:01 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 316
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Wait, that’s the ALPA proposal or the company proposal?! If that’s the ALPA proposal, why the $&@? haven’t they accepted that? That’s actually very generous as it is, should be an even higher ask. Ours comes out on Monday, hopefully that gets the comparison equation to change for the positive in pattern bargaining.
Well here’s one thought that I don’t actually know the answer to. NK is a low revenue operation. Wouldn’t it be a fairer compensation comparison using say, legacy pilot CASM / RASM to get a percentage, and use that percentage and multiply it by NK’s RASM to see what NK’s pilot cost per ASM should be and then translate it to an hourly rate.

You can hardly expect NK to pay legacy wages when each flight generate less revenue than a non-Ultra discount product.

I suspect the mediator has the same line of thinking.
Feng is offline  
Old 10-28-2017, 04:32 PM
  #48  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Posts: 53
Default

Originally Posted by Chimpy
Not even close. With keeping line bidding as a 5th year CA the Unions Proposal was $202.00

This was also with 11% DC, not 16% and ZERO Profit Sharing and yet the mediator still thinks we are being unreasonable


Hows that for a swift kick in the face eh?
I believe the rates quoted above were the company's proposal with PBS. I believe that was stated on one of the conference calls and that's what was in the mailing. I could be wrong though. So we get PBS with jetBlue rates from two years ago. Unsat.

Mr. White
Walter White is offline  
Old 10-28-2017, 04:51 PM
  #49  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 81
Default

Originally Posted by Feng
Well here’s one thought that I don’t actually know the answer to. NK is a low revenue operation. Wouldn’t it be a fairer compensation comparison using say, legacy pilot CASM / RASM to get a percentage, and use that percentage and multiply it by NK’s RASM to see what NK’s pilot cost per ASM should be and then translate it to an hourly rate.

You can hardly expect NK to pay legacy wages when each flight generate less revenue than a non-Ultra discount product.

I suspect the mediator has the same line of thinking.

Why does this dude who's not even an airline pilot keep posting stuff about our contract negotiations. It's very strange.
hayimcow is offline  
Old 10-28-2017, 05:31 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 316
Default

Originally Posted by hayimcow
Why does this dude who's not even an airline pilot keep posting stuff about our contract negotiations. It's very strange.
I guess it’s because the reasoning you guys use behind what you think you deserve is simply the most illogical thinking I’ve seen anywhere. Refute what I say, don’t attack the messenger. Oh and have you considered that I’m a woman?
Feng is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Future Cpt Kirk
Trans States Airlines
1873
12-06-2019 04:22 AM
KODI3
Southwest
2562
11-29-2016 03:42 PM
gzsg
Delta
100
09-06-2016 12:11 PM
CaptainCarl
Trans States Airlines
10900
12-31-2015 11:54 AM
HercMasterJ
FedEx
29
10-05-2015 03:22 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices