Search

Notices

Hello PBS; Goodbye QOL

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-04-2017, 12:54 PM
  #311  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 163
Default

Originally Posted by RonnyK320
That's my personal dream...
Make every ALPA hiring mins and interview process the same. Cant tell me getting on at Spirit is even close to as tough as DL,UA,FDX. So what would happen is people would try to jump the line by going to the bottom feeders like Spirit. Many tried this in 2015/2016 by going to Spirit in hopes that the bog boys would call and they could jump the line of orher RJ guys. This imploded on them and I laugh about it now. Serves them rite!
Beans is offline  
Old 12-04-2017, 02:12 PM
  #312  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FML666's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Position: Discount Pilot
Posts: 183
Default

Originally Posted by Beans
Many tried this in 2015/2016 by going to Spirit in hopes that the bog boys would call and they could jump the line of orher RJ guys. This imploded on them and I laugh about it now. Serves them rite!
What "line" are those RJ guys in?
FML666 is offline  
Old 12-04-2017, 03:03 PM
  #313  
Gets Weekends Off
 
king10pin02's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 588
Default

Originally Posted by squawkoff
Just spit balling here, but what if ALPA had a master seniority list that applied to all ALPA carriers? You go from one carrier to another , your seniority goes with you. Wouldn’t that force companies to up their game to attract pilots? Of course this wouldn’t work during a pilot surplus, which we’re not in. Just a thought.
could also prevent more experienced pilots from being hired. example: assuming 10yrs at spirit then go to Delta and Delta would have to pay 10yr pay instead of 1yr pay? Or was it 10yr at an alpa regional, should you go to 10yr pay? not saying i disagree just playing devils advocate
king10pin02 is offline  
Old 12-04-2017, 03:32 PM
  #314  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,735
Default

Originally Posted by FML666
What "line" are those RJ guys in?
I’m curious about this “line” too. Maybe they came to Spirit for a better QOL and didn’t want to stay at their shrinking regional.
Silver02ex is offline  
Old 12-04-2017, 03:34 PM
  #315  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 612
Default

Originally Posted by king10pin02
could also prevent more experienced pilots from being hired. example: assuming 10yrs at spirit then go to Delta and Delta would have to pay 10yr pay instead of 1yr pay? Or was it 10yr at an alpa regional, should you go to 10yr pay? not saying i disagree just playing devils advocate
Valid point but I disagree with the original question. Time with a company should buy you something IMO. If anyone wants to leave Spirit than great but they deserve nothing from the company that hires them besides a fair paying job and a free chance to prove their worth. That's like saying someone who spent 20 years in the regionals could get hired at Spirit and suddenly out rank most on the list. Stupid argument...
AllOva736 is offline  
Old 12-04-2017, 03:53 PM
  #316  
Voice of Reason
 
akulahunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Position: Uncomfortable
Posts: 481
Default

TBH, if you want to fix it, separate pay and seniority... make a pay scale banded by flight time ranges.
For example...
0-3000 pays x
3k-5k pays x
5k-7k pays x
Etc...

Figure a multiple for flight times if you need to use something as a base, assuming you think bigger is better (i.e. 737/A320 = 1.0xflt hrs, RJs = .9x, C172 = .7x, A380 = 1.3x, millennium falcon = 52x, etc) Have a seperate pay scale for CA/FO and give each band step raises per year (cuz not flying on reserve means not progressing up the scale). Make the numbers what you want, but make it similar to every other profession where your experience means something.

Note this has NOTHING to do with seniority. Newest guy in, means bottom of the heap. Your time at brand X means nothing to your new company or it's pilots other than recognizing your experience. (Which is why a National Seniority List is a terrible answer.)
akulahunter is offline  
Old 12-04-2017, 04:11 PM
  #317  
Gets Weekends Off
 
squawkoff's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: ????
Posts: 579
Default

Originally Posted by AllOva736
Valid point but I disagree with the original question. Time with a company should buy you something IMO. If anyone wants to leave Spirit than great but they deserve nothing from the company that hires them besides a fair paying job and a free chance to prove their worth. That's like saying someone who spent 20 years in the regionals could get hired at Spirit and suddenly out rank most on the list. Stupid argument...
Good point. Obviously I’m not good a “spit balling”!
squawkoff is offline  
Old 12-04-2017, 08:15 PM
  #318  
Gets Weekends Off
 
king10pin02's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 588
Default

Originally Posted by akulahunter
TBH, if you want to fix it, separate pay and seniority... make a pay scale banded by flight time ranges.
For example...
0-3000 pays x
3k-5k pays x
5k-7k pays x
Etc...

Figure a multiple for flight times if you need to use something as a base, assuming you think bigger is better (i.e. 737/A320 = 1.0xflt hrs, RJs = .9x, C172 = .7x, A380 = 1.3x, millennium falcon = 52x, etc) Have a seperate pay scale for CA/FO and give each band step raises per year (cuz not flying on reserve means not progressing up the scale). Make the numbers what you want, but make it similar to every other profession where your experience means something.

Note this has NOTHING to do with seniority. Newest guy in, means bottom of the heap. Your time at brand X means nothing to your new company or it's pilots other than recognizing your experience. (Which is why a National Seniority List is a terrible answer.)
sadly again encourages companies to hire lower time pilots
king10pin02 is offline  
Old 12-05-2017, 03:00 AM
  #319  
Voice of Reason
 
akulahunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Position: Uncomfortable
Posts: 481
Default

Originally Posted by king10pin02
sadly again encourages companies to hire lower time pilots
Sadly, still better than today where you can go from amazing to food stamps in a week. Also, if the entire industry was that way, there aren't enough low time pilots to fly ALL the planes. That hiring strategy would only work for so long...
akulahunter is offline  
Old 12-05-2017, 04:57 AM
  #320  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Default

Originally Posted by akulahunter
Sadly, still better than today where you can go from amazing to food stamps in a week. Also, if the entire industry was that way, there aren't enough low time pilots to fly ALL the planes. That hiring strategy would only work for so long...
You guys keep saying hired by different airlines.

Ideally ALPA would do the hiring with airline input and you are placed on a master seniority list. At that point you’d bid for a vacancy, say
FEDEX MEM 777 CA as your first choice and Mesa ORD CRJ200 FO as your last choice. The pay rates for equipment would be different but otherwise the contract and work rules would be the same. During vacancy bids you would be able to other fleets and if your seniority holds it.

Now, Lets say United needed to furlough 1,000 Pilots is where it would get tricky if there aren’t 1000 vacancies elsewhere. Preventing a massive training bubble across all airlines while also furloughing those most junior on the master seniority list even if they aren’t necessarily at united.

That would be the ideal setup that way it wouldn’t matter who you work for because you actually work for ALPA, you just happen to be holding Delta NYC 717 CA right now. You don’t have to worry if you are hitching your cart to today’s winner and tomorrow’s goat.
Qotsaautopilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Future Cpt Kirk
Trans States Airlines
1873
12-06-2019 04:22 AM
KODI3
Southwest
2562
11-29-2016 03:42 PM
gzsg
Delta
100
09-06-2016 12:11 PM
CaptainCarl
Trans States Airlines
10900
12-31-2015 11:54 AM
HercMasterJ
FedEx
29
10-05-2015 03:22 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices