Hello PBS; Goodbye QOL
#91
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 256
you're getting old!! and you're not fooling anybody. time to change your screen name and try again. May I suggest "bendosboytoy"
#93
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,480
That depends upon the rest of the agreement and how it's structured.
It's called "negotiating" and we can't move forward without it.
But I will share in your "no" vote if it includes the current proposal of not seeing the 5 hour min day until PBS is active.
It's called "negotiating" and we can't move forward without it.
But I will share in your "no" vote if it includes the current proposal of not seeing the 5 hour min day until PBS is active.
#94
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 227
I think this train of thought is excellent...actually using numbers to convey a point. Excellent write up, a couple things that'll be hard but needs to be factored in to the amount of increase in CASM.
1. Unless you're departing the gate going 500mph and arriving at 500mph with no taxing time, I'm not sure 2 hrs for 991 miles is doable. More like 2:35 maybe?
2. In your equations, you only accounted for the direct impact of the pilots working that specific flight to the CASM. It would be accurate if the airline paid the total of its pilots the same credits hours as its block hours. How any pilots on reserve work 100-300 hours a year and gets paid 900-1000? Or line holders that block 800/yr and credit 1000-1200 via transition, sick, vacation, etc...Those unblocked credit increase the CASM that's not accounted for in your equation.
Does that make sense? If not I'll try to be clearer.
3. Other things
Though an interesting and valid way of looking at the number, it makes it harder to quantify. I feel a better way is to simply add what the contract increases are worth as a whole and add/subtract from the balance sheet to get the figures you're looking for.
Truly not trying to troll. Just enjoy these discussions.
1. Unless you're departing the gate going 500mph and arriving at 500mph with no taxing time, I'm not sure 2 hrs for 991 miles is doable. More like 2:35 maybe?
2. In your equations, you only accounted for the direct impact of the pilots working that specific flight to the CASM. It would be accurate if the airline paid the total of its pilots the same credits hours as its block hours. How any pilots on reserve work 100-300 hours a year and gets paid 900-1000? Or line holders that block 800/yr and credit 1000-1200 via transition, sick, vacation, etc...Those unblocked credit increase the CASM that's not accounted for in your equation.
Does that make sense? If not I'll try to be clearer.
3. Other things
Though an interesting and valid way of looking at the number, it makes it harder to quantify. I feel a better way is to simply add what the contract increases are worth as a whole and add/subtract from the balance sheet to get the figures you're looking for.
Truly not trying to troll. Just enjoy these discussions.
RE 2: good point but you forgot something. The company reported CASM of 5.42 already accounts for the current soft time, transition, sick and vacation. The direct CASM on the imaginary average flight we are using in our examples would actually be lower than the company reported CASM.
#95
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 227
Not sure if you read my previous previous post. I believe that there are legitimate factors that the above equation does not consider.
You yourself flew ~150 hours last year. Had there been a higher compensation, your equation would factor in the higher CASM for those 150 hours worth of flights. But how do you reconcile the additional ~750 hours that you were paid and it’s impact on the overall increase in CASM.
You yourself flew ~150 hours last year. Had there been a higher compensation, your equation would factor in the higher CASM for those 150 hours worth of flights. But how do you reconcile the additional ~750 hours that you were paid and it’s impact on the overall increase in CASM.
Here’s a solution for Spirit: build more efficient schedules.
#97
#98
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Posts: 202
It's not LOL! You've missed the point completely. I don't have an issue with 28 hr 4 days. I have an issue with 13 days off and 90 hrs a month. Plus zero open and drop time. That's what's in the pipe line. 12 days on 83/85 hrs is ok if that's what you want to bid. We will need the option to decompress too. Point is PBS with this management group and under their control is bad news for the pilot group. The union needs to focus on the back end. Bendo is already there waiting for us. Spirit is licking their chops for PBS. CONTRACT IS REVNUE POSITIVE WITH PBS for the company. BTW This is how my buddy at AA works. 90 hrs plus a month and can't get home/ to work on one or both ends of a trip.
#99
#100
Banned
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 775
That was my point. Currently we're not talking and I'd bet late next year we'll start back at it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post