Search

Notices

Hello PBS; Goodbye QOL

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-30-2017, 07:28 AM
  #91  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 256
Default

Originally Posted by Lincoln Osiris
This sitting around waiting for the company to start shtting out rainbows is getting old. Phone polls and billboards will only make management laugh and will not get them back to the negotiation table.
you're getting old!! and you're not fooling anybody. time to change your screen name and try again. May I suggest "bendosboytoy"
Poppachubby is offline  
Old 10-30-2017, 07:57 AM
  #92  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 775
Exclamation

All I can say is PBS is a NO vote.
Super EZ E is offline  
Old 10-30-2017, 08:42 AM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,480
Default

Originally Posted by Super EZ E
All I can say is PBS is a NO vote.
That depends upon the rest of the agreement and how it's structured.

It's called "negotiating" and we can't move forward without it.

But I will share in your "no" vote if it includes the current proposal of not seeing the 5 hour min day until PBS is active.
putzin is offline  
Old 10-30-2017, 01:07 PM
  #94  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 227
Default

Originally Posted by Feng
I think this train of thought is excellent...actually using numbers to convey a point. Excellent write up, a couple things that'll be hard but needs to be factored in to the amount of increase in CASM.

1. Unless you're departing the gate going 500mph and arriving at 500mph with no taxing time, I'm not sure 2 hrs for 991 miles is doable. More like 2:35 maybe?

2. In your equations, you only accounted for the direct impact of the pilots working that specific flight to the CASM. It would be accurate if the airline paid the total of its pilots the same credits hours as its block hours. How any pilots on reserve work 100-300 hours a year and gets paid 900-1000? Or line holders that block 800/yr and credit 1000-1200 via transition, sick, vacation, etc...Those unblocked credit increase the CASM that's not accounted for in your equation.

Does that make sense? If not I'll try to be clearer.

3. Other things

Though an interesting and valid way of looking at the number, it makes it harder to quantify. I feel a better way is to simply add what the contract increases are worth as a whole and add/subtract from the balance sheet to get the figures you're looking for.

Truly not trying to troll. Just enjoy these discussions.

RE 2: good point but you forgot something. The company reported CASM of 5.42 already accounts for the current soft time, transition, sick and vacation. The direct CASM on the imaginary average flight we are using in our examples would actually be lower than the company reported CASM.
Planepirate is offline  
Old 10-30-2017, 01:19 PM
  #95  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 227
Default

Originally Posted by Feng
Not sure if you read my previous previous post. I believe that there are legitimate factors that the above equation does not consider.

You yourself flew ~150 hours last year. Had there been a higher compensation, your equation would factor in the higher CASM for those 150 hours worth of flights. But how do you reconcile the additional ~750 hours that you were paid and it’s impact on the overall increase in CASM.
Chimpy is a slacker no doubt, but he sure smart (or maybe he’s a slacker because he is smart... idk). But his slackness is already factored into the company’s reported CASM of 7.48 he used in his calculations.

Here’s a solution for Spirit: build more efficient schedules.
Planepirate is offline  
Old 10-30-2017, 04:30 PM
  #96  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 456
Default

Originally Posted by Poppachubby
you're getting old!! and you're not fooling anybody. time to change your screen name and try again. May I suggest "bendosboytoy"
Lol this is awesome!:
Dukeuno is offline  
Old 10-30-2017, 04:57 PM
  #97  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lincoln Osiris's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Position: NK CA
Posts: 854
Default

Originally Posted by Poppachubby
you're getting old!! and you're not fooling anybody. time to change your screen name and try again. May I suggest "bendosboytoy"
Man that would be a really great comeback if we were in the 7th grade.
Lincoln Osiris is online now  
Old 10-30-2017, 07:37 PM
  #98  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Posts: 202
Default

Originally Posted by Super EZ E
It's not LOL! You've missed the point completely. I don't have an issue with 28 hr 4 days. I have an issue with 13 days off and 90 hrs a month. Plus zero open and drop time. That's what's in the pipe line. 12 days on 83/85 hrs is ok if that's what you want to bid. We will need the option to decompress too. Point is PBS with this management group and under their control is bad news for the pilot group. The union needs to focus on the back end. Bendo is already there waiting for us. Spirit is licking their chops for PBS. CONTRACT IS REVNUE POSITIVE WITH PBS for the company. BTW This is how my buddy at AA works. 90 hrs plus a month and can't get home/ to work on one or both ends of a trip.
28 hr four days make 13 days off and only 90hrs impossible. 30-31 day months, 4 28hr four days equals 14-15 days off 112hrs credit. At least be honest
dogpilot is offline  
Old 10-30-2017, 07:46 PM
  #99  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lincoln Osiris's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Position: NK CA
Posts: 854
Default

Originally Posted by dogpilot
28 hr four days make 13 days off and only 90hrs impossible. 30-31 day months, 4 28hr four days equals 14-15 days off 112hrs credit. At least be honest
True, and I'm also not sure why they think there would be zero ability to drop, add, or swap trips?
Lincoln Osiris is online now  
Old 10-30-2017, 10:07 PM
  #100  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 775
Default

Originally Posted by putzin
That depends upon the rest of the agreement and how it's structured.

It's called "negotiating" and we can't move forward without it.

But I will share in your "no" vote if it includes the current proposal of not seeing the 5 hour min day until PBS is active.
That was my point. Currently we're not talking and I'd bet late next year we'll start back at it.
Super EZ E is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Future Cpt Kirk
Trans States Airlines
1873
12-06-2019 04:22 AM
KODI3
Southwest
2562
11-29-2016 03:42 PM
gzsg
Delta
100
09-06-2016 12:11 PM
CaptainCarl
Trans States Airlines
10900
12-31-2015 11:54 AM
HercMasterJ
FedEx
29
10-05-2015 03:22 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices