Search

Notices

Upgrade now 20+ YEARS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-26-2017, 04:04 PM
  #11  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 81
Default

After listening to the webcast, I felt it was pretty positive. Still high growth, 20% in 2018, 2019 growth will be less than prior years but still upwards of 10%. There are no plans to stop growing. It was also mentioned that the new pilot contract is directly correlated to new AC orders.
hayimcow is offline  
Old 10-26-2017, 04:23 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tranquility's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: Da Bus, Left
Posts: 1,564
Default

Originally Posted by hayimcow
After listening to the webcast, I felt it was pretty positive. Still high growth, 20% in 2018, 2019 growth will be less than prior years but still upwards of 10%. There are no plans to stop growing. It was also mentioned that the new pilot contract is directly correlated to new AC orders.
Oh dear.... I sincerely hope you’re just regurgitating what was said and don’t actually believe that. Otherwise, you’re management or incredibly naive. The planes will/will not come REGARDLESS of a pilot deal!!! It is not up to this pilot group to make their business model work. We just move the aluminum....
Tranquility is offline  
Old 10-26-2017, 04:31 PM
  #13  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 81
Default

Originally Posted by Tranquility
Oh dear.... I sincerely hope you’re just regurgitating what was said and don’t actually believe that. Otherwise, you’re management or incredibly naive. The planes will/will not come REGARDLESS of a pilot deal!!! It is not up to this pilot group to make their business model work. We just move the aluminum....

Well, like many people I've heard mention and hope is that the company will want to get a deal done so they can order more aircraft. So how is that not positive for us? Either way, I was just repeating what was said. Take it as you will.
hayimcow is offline  
Old 10-26-2017, 05:11 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,932
Default

Originally Posted by hayimcow
Well, like many people I've heard mention and hope is that the company will want to get a deal done so they can order more aircraft. So how is that not positive for us? Either way, I was just repeating what was said. Take it as you will.
Except it won’t be “want to get a deal done so they can get more aircraft.” It’ll be “here’s an order of 50 new planes we can do, just sign this contract and then they’ll come.”
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 10-26-2017, 05:27 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tranquility's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: Da Bus, Left
Posts: 1,564
Default

Originally Posted by hayimcow
Well, like many people I've heard mention and hope is that the company will want to get a deal done so they can order more aircraft. So how is that not positive for us? Either way, I was just repeating what was said. Take it as you will.
If they wanted a deal done, they could have had it 2 years ago likely at a much cheaper cost than now. Their fault, not ours. Now the real question, why don’t Wall Street analysts ask why management bypassed a cheaper deal earlier for something more expensive now?
Tranquility is offline  
Old 10-26-2017, 05:31 PM
  #16  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 775
Default

Airlines growth mirrors GDP. 1% to 4% is the normal. When you see crazy growth numbers it is usually hard to manage and profits fall sharply. IMHO!
Super EZ E is offline  
Old 10-27-2017, 03:52 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 316
Default

Originally Posted by Tranquility
If they wanted a deal done, they could have had it 2 years ago likely at a much cheaper cost than now. Their fault, not ours. Now the real question, why don’t Wall Street analysts ask why management bypassed a cheaper deal earlier for something more expensive now?
What more expensive deal? If you wait 5 more years, that deal’s going to be even more lucrative.
Feng is offline  
Old 10-27-2017, 04:05 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: Port Bus
Posts: 725
Default

Originally Posted by Feng
What more expensive deal? If you wait 5 more years, that deal’s going to be even more lucrative.
Exactly, the company is saving millions by dragging it out. Although in the end rates will be paid at a higher rate.
Pogey Bait is offline  
Old 10-27-2017, 06:27 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 316
Default

Originally Posted by Pogey Bait
Exactly, the company is saving millions by dragging it out. Although in the end rates will be paid at a higher rate.
Yeah? IF say a deal was offered 2 years ago at DOS for a 20% raise and then 3% each year thereafter...for the sake of simplicity, say it went from $100/hr to $120 to $123 to $127...$131...$135 to $139 by year 5.

If the contract gets dragged on for 5 years. Do you see the final result being getting an 40% raise to $140 or for some reason the company will cave and give you an 80% raise to $180?

I'm not sure the "we're winning because the ask just went up" holds any water as far as how much more money you'll actually get in your pocket when it's all said and done considering the time value of money lost.

I think at some point, ALPA will use Spirit as a case study of what not to do during negotiations. Whether you deserve it or not, I don't see the NMB and the administration allowing a strike when a 20%-40% raise is/was offered.

JMHO
Feng is offline  
Old 10-27-2017, 06:56 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,256
Default

Originally Posted by Feng
Yeah? IF say a deal was offered 2 years ago at DOS for a 20% raise and then 3% each year thereafter...for the sake of simplicity, say it went from $100/hr to $120 to $123 to $127...$131...$135 to $139 by year 5.

If the contract gets dragged on for 5 years. Do you see the final result being getting an 40% raise to $140 or for some reason the company will cave and give you an 80% raise to $180?

I'm not sure the "we're winning because the ask just went up" holds any water as far as how much more money you'll actually get in your pocket when it's all said and done considering the time value of money lost.

I think at some point, ALPA will use Spirit as a case study of what not to do during negotiations. Whether you deserve it or not, I don't see the NMB and the administration allowing a strike when a 20%-40% raise is/was offered.

JMHO
AA’s big failure was always swinging for the fences. Delta did the opposite, slowly building upon each successive contract. I’ve said time and time again on here take the short term small wins. Collectively they are worth more.
Name User is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
srbpilot
SkyWest
10
03-20-2015 04:45 AM
benairguitar23
Regional
35
01-10-2013 05:11 AM
Bucking Bar
Hangar Talk
7
04-23-2009 06:21 PM
130drvr
Hangar Talk
1
03-17-2009 02:21 PM
captain_drew
Hangar Talk
2
04-14-2006 04:46 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices