Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Spirit
national mediation board >

national mediation board

Search

Notices

national mediation board

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-25-2017, 10:44 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 319/320/321...whatever it takes.
Posts: 492
Default

Originally Posted by Feng
Yes, one of the highest margins in fact. And the way they get that from one of the lowest RASM airlines is because it has one of the lowest CASM.

If CASM increases without revenue increase it'll be one of the least profitable airlines. Hence, you won't see legacy wages without legacy revenues.

Queue someone, "it's been proven by our union that we can get million dollar raises and still be INSANELLY profitable!!!"
I think we need to look at the big picture here. I recently did a flight Houston to Las Vegas. Let's look at the numbers. I'm an 11 year captain and I make $165 an hour (way too low). It took three hours to do the flight. I made $495. Now divide that by 182 seats, and then divide that by 1272 miles. The answer you get is .00213 CASM for me. That's 2 thousandths of a penny per mile I'm costing the company. If I were to get a raise to $250 an hour, my portion of CASM would be .00312. The cost would only go up .0009 cents. Now, you also have to include the FO at roughly 2/3 of that. When the company says our CASM is around 5.5 and says it would go up by any appreciable amount they are lying. Even if we all got a raise to $500 an hour, our CASM would still be under six cents. Yes, this may be oversimplified and there are intangibles that I cannot quantify here. But to say a raise to industry-standard pay would cripple the company, is flat out wrong. We would still have one of the lowest CASMs in the industry, and one of the highest percent profit. And by the way my retro check is approaching $160,000 and climbing.

Not calling you out specifically, your post had CASM in it.
Left Handed is offline  
Old 08-25-2017, 12:31 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 316
Default

Originally Posted by Left Handed
I think we need to look at the big picture here. I recently did a flight Houston to Las Vegas. Let's look at the numbers. I'm an 11 year captain and I make $165 an hour (way too low). It took three hours to do the flight. I made $495. Now divide that by 182 seats, and then divide that by 1272 miles. The answer you get is .00213 CASM for me. That's 2 thousandths of a penny per mile I'm costing the company. If I were to get a raise to $250 an hour, my portion of CASM would be .00312. The cost would only go up .0009 cents. Now, you also have to include the FO at roughly 2/3 of that. When the company says our CASM is around 5.5 and says it would go up by any appreciable amount they are lying. Even if we all got a raise to $500 an hour, our CASM would still be under six cents. Yes, this may be oversimplified and there are intangibles that I cannot quantify here. But to say a raise to industry-standard pay would cripple the company, is flat out wrong. We would still have one of the lowest CASMs in the industry, and one of the highest percent profit. And by the way my retro check is approaching $160,000 and climbing.

Not calling you out specifically, your post had CASM in it.
Good summary. Looking at the big picture though. Traditionally airline costs are 30% for airplanes, 30% for fuel, and 30% for payroll. The first two items the company won't be able to do anything about. The last one though, being the ULCC like it is with low RASM, that's where it'll need to be significantly lower than non ULCC competitors. If they staffed and paid the airline (not just the pilots) like a legacy airline, that profit would shrink away rather quickly.

Hell, even the janitors in Miramar, if they weren't outsourced, can come up with fancy charts and numbers that say if Spirit paid the 10 of them $1 million a year each, it'd still be huuuugely profitable company. But it just ain't gonna happen.

I think you're the only ones counting that retro check, because I doubt anyone cares.

The only thing that matters is what the mediators, arbitrators, the members of NMB, and the president thinks. And if Spirit has indeed proposed wages and work rules similar to it's counterparts, and if they consider the counterparts are Allegiant, Frontier, and Sun Country. There will never be a strike because the company will have deemed to be negotiating in good faith. I'm sure your union will do their best to compare itself to United, Delta, AA...etc, but once the revenue comparisons are laid out, I just don't see it happening.

Good luck though.
Feng is offline  
Old 08-25-2017, 01:04 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 316
Default

Originally Posted by Bum Hands
You clearly have no clue, please just go away and annoy another pilot group.
Feel free to correct me and contribute to the conversation. It's an open forum you know!!
Feng is offline  
Old 08-25-2017, 01:16 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 319/320/321...whatever it takes.
Posts: 492
Default

Originally Posted by Feng
Good summary. Looking at the big picture though. Traditionally airline costs are 30% for airplanes, 30% for fuel, and 30% for payroll. The first two items the company won't be able to do anything about. The last one though, being the ULCC like it is with low RASM, that's where it'll need to be significantly lower than non ULCC competitors. If they staffed and paid the airline (not just the pilots) like a legacy airline, that profit would shrink away rather quickly.

Hell, even the janitors in Miramar, if they weren't outsourced, can come up with fancy charts and numbers that say if Spirit paid the 10 of them $1 million a year each, it'd still be huuuugely profitable company. But it just ain't gonna happen.

I think you're the only ones counting that retro check, because I doubt anyone cares.

The only thing that matters is what the mediators, arbitrators, the members of NMB, and the president thinks. And if Spirit has indeed proposed wages and work rules similar to it's counterparts, and if they consider the counterparts are Allegiant, Frontier, and Sun Country. There will never be a strike because the company will have deemed to be negotiating in good faith. I'm sure your union will do their best to compare itself to United, Delta, AA...etc, but once the revenue comparisons are laid out, I just don't see it happening.

Good luck though.
Yeah, I was being facetious with the retro check. I just looked up flights from Houston to Vegas. On Saturday (fight night), Spirit is $59 one-way. United ranges from $81 basic economy to over $2000. On the Friday of Labor Day weekend, Spirit is $169 and United ranges from $235 to over $1000. I am under no illusions that Spirit will keep the ticket price the same. Using my previous example of an $85 an hour raise, Spirit would have to raise ticket prices 46 cents to cover my portion of the flight. Spirit could even raise tickets $20 and still be well underneath the average price going to Vegas. We would still be an ultra low-cost carrier. It would just cost a consumer slightly more money to go somewhere. If Spirit were smart, they would just increase the bag fee by a dollar and they could keep their "low ticket price" image.

I believe I saw somewhere that the company does not consider allegiant our peer. They do consider Frontier, Southwest, JetBlue, Alaska, and Virgin to be our peers as well as the big three. We will see how that plays out. I do agree that it's basically up to the mediator as to who is being more reasonable. Last time we were released in a bankruptcy environment when we were asking to be paid more than USAir drivers. The mediator finally got tired of the company shenanigans and let us walk. I see the company making the same mistakes as last time so we will have to wait and see how farthe mediator let's it go.
Left Handed is offline  
Old 08-25-2017, 01:33 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Airplanes
Posts: 1,403
Default

Don't forget ol' BBBBooooo, BBBbooobbbb, bbbbbbbb, Bob makes more than Gary Kelly. Who is his peer?
Macjet is offline  
Old 08-25-2017, 02:27 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Position: A320 Left.
Posts: 113
Default

Originally Posted by Left Handed
I think we need to look at the big picture here. I recently did a flight Houston to Las Vegas. Let's look at the numbers. I'm an 11 year captain and I make $165 an hour (way too low). It took three hours to do the flight. I made $495. Now divide that by 182 seats, and then divide that by 1272 miles. The answer you get is .00213 CASM for me. That's 2 thousandths of a penny per mile I'm costing the company. If I were to get a raise to $250 an hour, my portion of CASM would be .00312. The cost would only go up .0009 cents. Now, you also have to include the FO at roughly 2/3 of that. When the company says our CASM is around 5.5 and says it would go up by any appreciable amount they are lying. Even if we all got a raise to $500 an hour, our CASM would still be under six cents. Yes, this may be oversimplified and there are intangibles that I cannot quantify here. But to say a raise to industry-standard pay would cripple the company, is flat out wrong. We would still have one of the lowest CASMs in the industry, and one of the highest percent profit. And by the way my retro check is approaching $160,000 and climbing.

Not calling you out specifically, your post had CASM in it.
Check your decimal placement. Love, the Math Nazi.
Lemon Jello is offline  
Old 08-25-2017, 02:51 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 319/320/321...whatever it takes.
Posts: 492
Default

Originally Posted by Lemon Jello
Check your decimal placement. Love, the Math Nazi.
Which one?
165 times 3 divided by 182 divided by 1276 = .00213
Left Handed is offline  
Old 08-25-2017, 02:55 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Default

There is much more to being a ULCC than labor. Aircraft utilization for one and real estate for two. How the other work groups get paid is up to them. We negotiate for ourselves. Revenue will increase with an industry standard pilot contract and cost associated with IROPs will go down.

Feng,

Give me one good reason why you are here managing down our expectations and telling us who our "peers" are and how you think an airline cost structure works? As a pilot that isn't benificial to you in any way whether you work at spirit or not. If you work at a lobor busting law firm like ford and Harrison or are a member of spirit management I can see your motivation. You seemed to have clearly picked a side and I can tell you it's the wrong one.

And btw I am counting on full retro so it's safe to say it's more than one of us. Delta got it. Hawaiian got it. It's industry standard.
Qotsaautopilot is offline  
Old 08-25-2017, 03:34 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 429
Default

They can add a pilot happiness fee on the website for all care. FUPM
IWalkJun12 is offline  
Old 08-25-2017, 03:37 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Position: A320 Left.
Posts: 113
Default

Originally Posted by Left Handed
Which one?
165 times 3 divided by 182 divided by 1276 = .00213
True that, but it's 2/1000's of a dollar, not a cent.
Lemon Jello is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jetliner1526
Major
46
02-03-2015 07:45 AM
satpak77
American
17
02-12-2013 12:58 PM
forgot to bid
Major
71
02-16-2010 11:00 AM
HSLD
Major
224
07-18-2007 11:24 AM
Gordon C
Major
0
07-29-2005 01:12 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices