Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Spirit
Our NewHire Failure rate hovering above 5% >

Our NewHire Failure rate hovering above 5%

Search

Notices

Our NewHire Failure rate hovering above 5%

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-09-2017, 05:53 AM
  #71  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2017
Posts: 37
Default

Originally Posted by Chimpy
The real failure ailure right is nearly 10% and the reason?, well....................... think about. Our training hasn't changed, neither has the airplane we fly. We pretty much have the same instructors (who are all AWESOME, I genuinely mean that) so whats left?

that's right, the experience of the new hire. Guys with low time etc.............. Its really not that complicated, when regional airlines pay more and have a flow/interview opportunity, why would someone come to an airline like Spirit? High Fives don't pay the mortgage.....................
Yup, when everything else remains the same, what has changed, the applicant.

Its been said over and over; this training program was not made for a low timer and/or someone who has never been through a 121 training program. There are exceptions, just as some fail who have plenty of 121 time and experience, but numbers don't lie

The real failure rate would be much higher IF Spirit actually fired/removed pilots in training using the same benchmarks as they did 2,3, 4 years ago. New hires are not only getting extra sims, but extra ground school after the bust their oral.

As far as the finished product goes once it hits the flight line; well you can guess what we are dealing with.
Mozekian is offline  
Old 10-09-2017, 06:07 AM
  #72  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 85
Default

Originally Posted by Mozekian
Yup, when everything else remains the same, what has changed, the applicant.

Its been said over and over; this training program was not made for a low timer and/or someone who has never been through a 121 training program. There are exceptions, just as some fail who have plenty of 121 time and experience, but numbers don't lie

The real failure rate would be much higher IF Spirit actually fired/removed pilots in training using the same benchmarks as they did 2,3, 4 years ago. New hires are not only getting extra sims, but extra ground school after the bust their oral.

As far as the finished product goes once it hits the flight line; well you can guess what we are dealing with.
It's has very little to do with the applicants. It has everything to do with the training department (director of training and down). Almost every airline hires pilots with low time (especially military guys). So why is the failure so high at Spirit? Simple, poorly structured training program.

-Requirements to be a ground instructor are sad. No Airbus time, really? College degree and 2 years of CFI experience.

Doesn't Spirit have 2000-3000 TT requirement?

Last edited by CRJoperator; 10-09-2017 at 06:22 AM.
CRJoperator is offline  
Old 10-09-2017, 06:22 AM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Chimpy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,542
Default

Originally Posted by CRJoperator
It's has very little to do with the applicants. It has everything to do with the training department (director of training and down). Almost every airline hires pilots with low time (especially military guys). So why is the failure so high at Spirit? Simple, poorly structured training program.

-Requirements to be a ground instructor are sad. No Airbus time, really? College degree and 2 years of CFI experience.

Doesn't Spirit have 4000 TT requirement?

Lol maybe years ago, last guy I flew with had 2,000hrs TT
Chimpy is offline  
Old 10-09-2017, 06:25 AM
  #74  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 85
Default

Originally Posted by Chimpy
Lol maybe years ago, last guy I flew with had 2,000hrs TT
Sorry corrected my TT
CRJoperator is offline  
Old 10-09-2017, 06:53 AM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 323
Default

Originally Posted by Mozekian
As far as the finished product goes once it hits the flight line; well you can guess what we are dealing with.
I can only speak for myself, but the "finished product" I've been dealing with has been excellent. A lot better than I was as a new hire.
flyboyike is offline  
Old 10-09-2017, 08:00 AM
  #76  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 56
Default

I’ve been through structured training my entire career. Part 141 school, some really good 135 (a few bad ones) and 2 121 programs. I’ve been through upgrade at previous jobs, including 1 of the 121 carriers. I’ve never failed any of them, until Spirit. This is the most disorganized mess I’ve ever seen anywhere. Instructors (some, not all) are arrogant pricks with something to prove. No structure to the program at all. Stay away from this mess unless you’re will to risk a bust. You will be on your own to learn the airplane, they don’t teach anything other than how to calculate a CDP for the LOC approach. Oh, and you get to play in the pool one day
TheDudeabide is offline  
Old 10-09-2017, 10:19 AM
  #77  
Line Holder
 
airsense00's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Position: A320
Posts: 76
Default

Originally Posted by TheDudeabide
I’ve been through structured training my entire career. Part 141 school, some really good 135 (a few bad ones) and 2 121 programs. I’ve been through upgrade at previous jobs, including 1 of the 121 carriers. I’ve never failed any of them, until Spirit. This is the most disorganized mess I’ve ever seen anywhere. Instructors (some, not all) are arrogant pricks with something to prove. No structure to the program at all. Stay away from this mess unless you’re will to risk a bust. You will be on your own to learn the airplane, they don’t teach anything other than how to calculate a CDP for the LOC approach. Oh, and you get to play in the pool one day
What did you bust for?
Maybe the training has changed since I have went through but you might be mad because you busted. I've done 141, 135, 121 also and although the training was fast and expectations high my entire class studied like crazy and we all passed. In fact we prepared so well that I thought the oral exam was quite easy. The line pilot instructors were very knowledgeable but did not hold hands. Did you retrain and make it?
airsense00 is offline  
Old 10-09-2017, 10:31 AM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Default

I think the training program is garbage and always has been. Experienced folks generally figured out how to get through it. It's also why spirit used to highly descriminate against 135 applicants that were used to training as a customer.

Now we hire many 135 pilots many with no degree so their opportunities elsewhere are limited. We also now hire many low time rj FOs that have only been through 121 initial at a regional where you get many sims and spoon fed systems. I wish we did that here but we don't. The 7-10yr FO has no problem and has been around long enough to make it work. We are hiring guys that came from a piston and went to an rj for a year or less. Many of the current applicants not only struggle through training but are somewhat more challenging to fly with. Some not all. They struggle with decision making because they haven't had many of the experiences applicants several years ago came in with as prerequisites.

The other problem which has no reflection on how they do their job or get through training is that some are so young that they have no skin in the game financially. No family, no mortgage, no college fund, no life insurance. Saying dumb crap like YOLO. No concept of what a good professional living is. I know I didn't at 24.

Some of the young guys fly great but some have no business flying a jet with 200 people in the back.
Qotsaautopilot is offline  
Old 10-09-2017, 11:35 AM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Bruno82's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: BE9L, Captain
Posts: 419
Default

Can anyone provide an outline of what the training regime looks like from indoc to IOE?
Bruno82 is offline  
Old 10-09-2017, 11:56 AM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Chimpy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,542
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
I think the training program is garbage and always has been. Experienced folks generally figured out how to get through it. It's also why spirit used to highly descriminate against 135 applicants that were used to training as a customer.

Now we hire many 135 pilots many with no degree so their opportunities elsewhere are limited. We also now hire many low time rj FOs that have only been through 121 initial at a regional where you get many sims and spoon fed systems. I wish we did that here but we don't. The 7-10yr FO has no problem and has been around long enough to make it work. We are hiring guys that came from a piston and went to an rj for a year or less. Many of the current applicants not only struggle through training but are somewhat more challenging to fly with. Some not all. They struggle with decision making because they haven't had many of the experiences applicants several years ago came in with as prerequisites.

The other problem which has no reflection on how they do their job or get through training is that some are so young that they have no skin in the game financially. No family, no mortgage, no college fund, no life insurance. Saying dumb crap like YOLO. No concept of what a good professional living is. I know I didn't at 24.

Some of the young guys fly great but some have no business flying a jet with 200 people in the back.
and yet the BOD & Mgmt dont give a sh-t................................
Chimpy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
jgdeleon09
PSA Airlines
178
10-09-2014 12:31 PM
unitedflyers1
Regional
54
03-24-2008 08:14 AM
Sir James
Major
11
01-13-2006 05:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices