Search

Notices

SWA Rumor Mill

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-19-2013, 06:07 AM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: A319/20/21 FO
Posts: 292
Default

There are 20 gates at DAL, which is the limit. SWA already has 16 of them. United has two, and AA has agreed to divest the two they have. However, AA has not used those gates in some time (since attempts to profitably serve DAL failed). Since then, they have been leased to ... drum roll, please ... Delta Air Lines. DL wishes to purchase the rights to the gates they have been leasing, and are using the promise of expanded service as political pressure. I don't blame them for doing it. However, I also don't think that giving the airline that already has 80% of the gates in DAL two more fosters increased competition.

At this point, the history of the Wright Amendment matters not a bit. In 11 months, it is consigned to the dustbin of history. Debating it then is like getting in to an argument over the Civil Aeronautics Board. Who cares??
VenetianFryCook is offline  
Old 11-19-2013, 07:47 AM
  #72  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by 27 driver
Southwest bought an airline with many gates in ATL. Delta could buy an airline with gates in DAL.
So then why should SWA be given uncompetitive access to gates in DCA while DAL and other legacies are not even allowed to bid. They should just buy another carrier that has access to those gates. After all, isn't SWA just oozing money out of every pore?
tsquare is offline  
Old 11-19-2013, 11:39 AM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
gipple's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 310
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
So then why should SWA be given uncompetitive access to gates in DCA while DAL and other legacies are not even allowed to bid. They should just buy another carrier that has access to those gates. After all, isn't SWA just oozing money out of every pore?
Maybe it is business karma for not paying bills pre-bankruptcy.
gipple is offline  
Old 11-19-2013, 12:33 PM
  #74  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by gipple
Maybe it is business karma for not paying bills pre-bankruptcy.

meh. I guess.... doesn't really have any bearing on today though now does it? I mean since little old "low cost carrier" (I am surprised they don't still call them an upstart )SWA wants access to such cesspools as LGA and EWR and DCA, it is only fitting that some other carriers be given access to their little gold mine in DAL.. Frankly, I think SWA is running a little scared of the legacies these days. But that's just my opinion.... I do know the reverse is no longer true. Nobody is afraid of SWA any more.
tsquare is offline  
Old 11-19-2013, 12:53 PM
  #75  
Reserve Sucks
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 189
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
So then why should SWA be given uncompetitive access to gates in DCA while DAL and other legacies are not even allowed to bid. They should just buy another carrier that has access to those gates. After all, isn't SWA just oozing money out of every pore?

I don't know. The gubiment controls those slots and decides who gets them. If SWA gets them great. If someone else gets them great. I hardly think 4 or 5 gates is uncompetitive access though. YMMV.
27 driver is offline  
Old 11-19-2013, 12:58 PM
  #76  
Reserve Sucks
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 189
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
meh. I guess.... doesn't really have any bearing on today though now does it? I mean since little old "low cost carrier" (I am surprised they don't still call them an upstart )SWA wants access to such cesspools as LGA and EWR and DCA, it is only fitting that some other carriers be given access to their little gold mine in DAL.. Frankly, I think SWA is running a little scared of the legacies these days. But that's just my opinion.... I do know the reverse is no longer true. Nobody is afraid of SWA any more.

I doubt SWA is scared of the legacies. Them good old Texas boys don't scare easily. They have cash, are making record profit, and can always file bankruptcy like all the real airlines did and skip out on their debt. It's a beautiful thing.
27 driver is offline  
Old 11-19-2013, 12:58 PM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: CA
Posts: 1,207
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Nobody is afraid of SWA any more.
Southwest could absolutely care less if anyone is "afraid" of them. There only focus is profit. So far that focus has worked out pretty well.
shoelu is offline  
Old 11-19-2013, 01:01 PM
  #78  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by 27 driver
I don't know. The gubiment controls those slots and decides who gets them. If SWA gets them great. If someone else gets them great. I hardly think 4 or 5 gates is uncompetitive access though. YMMV.
Didn't say that HAVING them was uncompetitive. Getting them thru a (basically) no-bid process... is. No variable mileage there.
tsquare is offline  
Old 11-19-2013, 01:28 PM
  #79  
Reserve Sucks
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 189
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Didn't say that HAVING them was uncompetitive. Getting them thru a (basically) no-bid process... is. No variable mileage there.
Dude, every airline will present their best case. The govt. will decide who gets the gates. I highly doubt SWA gets preferential treatment with the Feds. I could be wrong but I doubt it.
27 driver is offline  
Old 11-19-2013, 07:55 PM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
InformationEcho's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Position: My comfy old Barcalounger
Posts: 115
Default

Originally Posted by 27 driver
I doubt SWA is scared of the legacies. Them good old Texas boys don't scare easily. They have cash, are making record profit, and can always file bankruptcy like all the real airlines did and skip out on their debt. It's a beautiful thing.
Between this and the trail of dead kittens, is it any wonder everyone hates Southwest?

In 20/20 hindsight they should have bulldozed the runways at Love like they did at Stapleton.
InformationEcho is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Brakes Set
Southwest
10
06-25-2012 10:03 PM
Sr. Barco
Southwest
44
10-12-2011 07:39 PM
brakechatter
Major
601
10-12-2010 11:54 AM
Metal121
Major
20
02-04-2008 08:31 PM
SWAjet
Major
44
01-19-2006 12:21 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices