ALPA loses sub-lease DRC
#21
I think what is likely is that at some point, the remaining 717 fleet will be too small to effectively operate. Once they're down to a handful of airframes, they will probably just park them.
#22
Yes, I also believe when there are 5 airframes remaining, they will park them.
However, that is not the question at hand or the statement that was made by shoelu.
On 1/1/15, there will be 30+ 717's left. SWAPA thinks they are going to get parked and the fAT guys sent home with pay until they are given a training date.
SWA management has stated exactly the opposite. They will not park any 717 and instead extend the codeshare until the last crew is over.
I was asking shoelu, who stated SWA mgmt said they would be parked, to provide a source for his statement.
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: CA
Posts: 1,207
#24
Thanks, shoelu.
Not what I (and others) were hoping for.
That filing is trivial. It is amended with a 'due to changing market conditions'.
With almost 100% certainty I can say:
SWA will miss 1/1/15
They will petition SWAPA for relief
In the interim, they will continue to operate the remaining 717's, counting on the grievance/court process to take the months they need to complete the transition.
They will blame the whole thing on Delta and ALPA.
Not what I (and others) were hoping for.
That filing is trivial. It is amended with a 'due to changing market conditions'.
With almost 100% certainty I can say:
SWA will miss 1/1/15
They will petition SWAPA for relief
In the interim, they will continue to operate the remaining 717's, counting on the grievance/court process to take the months they need to complete the transition.
They will blame the whole thing on Delta and ALPA.
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: CA
Posts: 1,207
Thanks, shoelu.
Not what I (and others) were hoping for.
That filing is trivial. It is amended with a 'due to changing market conditions'.
With almost 100% certainty I can say:
SWA will miss 1/1/15
They will petition SWAPA for relief
In the interim, they will continue to operate the remaining 717's, counting on the grievance/court process to take the months they need to complete the transition.
They will blame the whole thing on Delta and ALPA.
Not what I (and others) were hoping for.
That filing is trivial. It is amended with a 'due to changing market conditions'.
With almost 100% certainty I can say:
SWA will miss 1/1/15
They will petition SWAPA for relief
In the interim, they will continue to operate the remaining 717's, counting on the grievance/court process to take the months they need to complete the transition.
They will blame the whole thing on Delta and ALPA.
While I agree that there is a strong chance the 1/1/15 deadline will be missed, SWA has directly stated to the FAA that any remaining airframes will be parked. It doesn't get any clearer than that. They can't fly them on the SWA side and our scope clause does not allow them to be flown by AirTran, which by the way will cease to exist on that date.
I suppose they could ask SWAPA for relief as you have speculated, but SWAPA has been adamant that they will expect SWA to live up to the projections set forth and codified in SL-10. Who knows, maybe that will be the leverage to get what we need in our never ending section 6 negotiations and it could actually do us all some good, but I really hope it never gets stretched out that long.
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 458
I believe the Q and A section directly addresses this scenario.
From the SL 10 Q and A section:
Q. How will future 737 captain vacancies be filled?
A. Until January 1, 2015, all 737 Captain will be filled by current Southwest pilots. After that date, Captain vacancies at SWA will be determined by system seniority.
From the SL 10 Q and A section:
Q. How will future 737 captain vacancies be filled?
A. Until January 1, 2015, all 737 Captain will be filled by current Southwest pilots. After that date, Captain vacancies at SWA will be determined by system seniority.
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: CA
Posts: 1,207
That is a completely plausible scenario, but I am hoping the $150,000,000 spent on the HOU terminal that is scheduled to begin service in 2015 will not be serviced with airframes already involved in profitable domestic service, but will represent a growth opportunity at SWA. That is my hopeful speculation. Whether not that turns out to be true, remains to be seen.
#30
On Reserve
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: CL600 A320
Posts: 13
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post