Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
Arbitrator rules in favor of ALPA >

Arbitrator rules in favor of ALPA

Search

Notices

Arbitrator rules in favor of ALPA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-22-2013, 02:47 PM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: CA
Posts: 1,207
Default

Originally Posted by MaxPowers


While that may be true, going from Morris Air to SWA in 1993 (into a period of huge growth) has little in common with going from AAI to SWA twenty years later.
How do you know what's going to happen twenty years down the road. Maybe when someone asks an AirTran pilot twenty years from now they will have a very similar answer. It most definitely is within the realm of possibility, if you are realistic you will be able to see that potential outcome.
shoelu is offline  
Old 10-22-2013, 03:47 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 127
Default

Maxpower - the word on the street is just about all AirTran pilots that have come to the darkside (SWA side of the partition) avoid the -300 like the plague. These individuals will bid into something else with a -700 or -800. All of the pilots I have flown with have been professional and awesome, period. Ok, your turn.
OrionTanker is offline  
Old 10-22-2013, 11:07 PM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
4th Level's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: B737 Captain
Posts: 323
Default

Originally Posted by Elmer Fudd
What are you talking about? The SW pilots treated the Air Tran, Morris Air & ATA guys fairly. Oh no, wait.......
What are you talking about?

SWA bought the remnants of ATA - 7 months after they liquidated.

Morris Air? Ask any of them, they did quite well.

AT? Who knows.

And I'll remind you, it wasn't the pilots at SWA that had anything to do with any of the above. EVERYTHING was dictated by the management at SWA, so please stop making this personal.
4th Level is offline  
Old 10-25-2013, 03:59 AM
  #54  
GAME ON!!!!
 
Elmer Fudd's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 131
Default

Originally Posted by 4th Level
What are you talking about?

SWA bought the remnants of ATA - 7 months after they liquidated.

Morris Air? Ask any of them, they did quite well.

AT? Who knows.

And I'll remind you, it wasn't the pilots at SWA that had anything to do with any of the above. EVERYTHING was dictated by the management at SWA, so please stop making this personal.
4th -

I have no dog in this fight & have no intention of making this "personal".

My comments were a reflection of the following:

1) Ex-ATA Captain, now at a regional, on the JS. Long story about how SW came in & screwed them. He stayed until the end, & watched as all the assets (MDW gates & aircraft) were sucked up, & the pilots discarded.

2) Very senior SW DFW Captain & FO - lengthy discussion about how SW "puts people in their place" during mergers. The CA said basically "We showed the Morris guys how it is done & now are showing the AT guys the same thing". The FO agreed, (he looked too young to know about the Morris merger), & said the AT guys "were lucky to be at SW, & should appreciate what they get", no matter what happens to them.

3) Discussion with AT FO - he said that he was "happy" SW bought them, but that all the AT CAs would be adversely affected by the merger. IOW, they would all be FOs & that the ultimate winner in the deal was the SW pilots. He said the merger would translate into him losing a few hundred thousand dollars, since he was close to upgrade at the time of the merger, & was now SOL.

I don't know any SW guys & have no real opinion about what they do, or how they conduct their business. I was just relating an overall opinion based on the multiple conversations stated above. It's kind of obvious why I could reach the conclusion I did. If the info is incorrect, I would defer to someone with more accurate info, since I was not personally involved with any of these incidents.
Elmer Fudd is offline  
Old 10-27-2013, 08:40 AM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MaxPowers's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 127
Default

No decision from the Arbitrator yet, but both the ALPA emails and the crew room rumors are that the case presented on behalf of the AirTran pilots was very strong. I guess we'll see soon enough.
MaxPowers is offline  
Old 10-27-2013, 09:22 AM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Frank Rizzo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: 717 Capt.
Posts: 248
Default

Originally Posted by MaxPowers
No decision from the Arbitrator yet, but both the ALPA emails and the crew room rumors are that the case presented on behalf of the AirTran pilots was very strong. I guess we'll see soon enough.
My prediction...

*AT pilots get something out of this arbitration
*Management disputes the ruling because they're scumbags
*The arbitrators decision wil not "constitute SWAPAs position" because they're scumbags
*After delaying as long as possible, second arbitration takes place
*Second arbitration goes in favor of management/SWAPA because its rigged in their favor
*Animosity and resentment for SWAPA and management continues to grow because they're scumbags
Frank Rizzo is offline  
Old 10-27-2013, 01:53 PM
  #57  
gets time off
 
mulcher's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,234
Default

ultimate winner in the deal was the SW pilots. He said the merger would translate into him losing a few hundred thousand dollars, since he was close to upgrade at the time of the merger, & was now SOL.
. The only SWA pilots that got anything are the few hundred that upgrade. As far as him losing a few hundred thousand dollars. He may want to retake a remedial math class. Some of them are pretty clueless. There was plenty of harm done to RSW pilots. We just aren't whining about it every chance we get.
mulcher is offline  
Old 10-27-2013, 02:39 PM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
MatthewAMEL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 752
Default

IF the arbitrator were to award ATN anything, SWAPA must present it as their position. If they give it anything less than their full-throated support, it's a DFR lawsuit.

If the remedy costs SWA money, you can be sure they will dispute it. 2nd Arbitration occurs and the board is 1 ATN pilot, 1 SWAPA pilot, 2 SWA reps and the neutral arbitrator. In that case, the vote would be 2-2 with the arbitrator vote deciding.
MatthewAMEL is offline  
Old 10-27-2013, 03:34 PM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Frank Rizzo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: 717 Capt.
Posts: 248
Default

Originally Posted by MatthewAMEL
IF the arbitrator were to award ATN anything, SWAPA must present it as their position. If they give it anything less than their full-throated support, it's a DFR lawsuit.

If the remedy costs SWA money, you can be sure they will dispute it. 2nd Arbitration occurs and the board is 1 ATN pilot, 1 SWAPA pilot, 2 SWA reps and the neutral arbitrator. In that case, the vote would be 2-2 with the arbitrator vote deciding.
Everything you said is correct, except for the last sentence. I'm not that optimistic.
Frank Rizzo is offline  
Old 10-27-2013, 03:52 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Frank Rizzo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: 717 Capt.
Posts: 248
Default

Originally Posted by mulcher
. He may want to retake a remedial math class. Some of them are pretty clueless.
The same can be said about 90% of SW FOs.

If nothing changes, I'm about to take a $30-40K yearly pay cut for many, many years while yanking gear for some guy hired long after me.

Acrimonious doesn't even begin to describe my attitude.

GK and SWAPA can blow me.
Frank Rizzo is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TheManager
Major
9584
07-28-2015 12:15 PM
CRJAV8OR
Major
36
03-27-2012 11:06 AM
PEACH
Union Talk
8
03-30-2010 08:40 AM
R1200RT
Major
1
07-23-2009 11:07 AM
CE750
Major
102
03-29-2008 05:32 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices