Search

Notices

Transition Award 13-9

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-08-2013, 10:18 PM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
blakman7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 270
Default

Originally Posted by shoelu
Once again your complete lack of understanding of the SWA system shines through! The Southwest system can only survive as long as pilots are willing to pick up open time.

SWA is able to run lean on pilot staffing because so many pilots are willing to pick up open time (whether at premium or straight pay). Southwest has rightly concluded that it is far cheaper to keep staffing lean and offer premium pay when necessary to cover open time.

SWA only carries around 10% reserve coverage, and those reserves will fly close to as much if not more than many line holders. If no open time was picked up by the pilot group Southwest could not even come close to flying their schedule and massive cancelations would occur. So the "milking the company for all it's worth." analogy is so far off the mark it is laughable.

The company simply could not function without the help the pilot group offers through straight or premium pay open time pick ups. If SWAPA ever decided to discourage open time pick ups because of a furlough or other abnormal scenario, the system, in its current form would crash very quickly.
I thought you'd be the one to come to the rescue, you never let me down. Good informative post as usual but I think you're defending the wrong point buddy. It's not picking up trips that I'm talking about. I'm specifically speaking of the "milking the company" comment made by your colleague. Calling out for a trip and then picking up another for premium pay is a form of "milking the company" no matter which way you look at it. You seriously didn't get the point that I was making?
blakman7 is offline  
Old 09-08-2013, 10:40 PM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: CA
Posts: 1,207
Default

Originally Posted by blakman7
It's not picking up trips that I'm talking about. I'm specifically speaking of the "milking the company" comment made by your colleague. Calling out for a trip and then picking up another for premium pay is a form of "milking the company" no matter which way you look at it. You seriously didn't get the point that I was making?
If your talking about calling in sick for a scheduled trip on your board in order to pick up a trip at premium pay from open time, you're crazy! I won't try and dispute that it has never happened, because I'm sure it actually has. But, to insinuate that is a common or ordinary practice by any definition of those words is ludicrous! How dumb do you think the folks in management are? That may fly once in your tenure like the sick call on Christmas or the illness during the trip after your vacation, but it surely is not, nor will ever be a practice that is allowed to happen with impunity.
shoelu is offline  
Old 09-09-2013, 07:22 AM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MaxPowers's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 127
Default

Originally Posted by Smokey23
Thanks for proving my point, guys (BTW, adding Frank Rizzo to the list of vocal complainers who haven't come over to the SWA side yet). I post a rebuttal to your assertions about pay cuts, using real world numbers and none of you are willing to touch it. Nice.



You got a very quick upgrade at a small major-in-name-only airline that was coming off a nice period of growth. Now you've been merged into a very big airline at which your system seniority would not be able to hold a left seat without long fences.
The fact that a SWA guy is saying this to an AirTran guy is an irony that will be recognized by many.

Most of us would be able to hold Captain just fine, if our seniority wasn't taken from us at gunpoint.

The top two thirds of our Captains were hired 1994-2001. The most junior SWA Capt is a 2004 hire. Get your facts straight, Pal.
MaxPowers is offline  
Old 09-09-2013, 08:53 AM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 682
Default

Originally Posted by MaxPowers
The fact that a SWA guy is saying this to an AirTran guy is an irony that will be recognized by many.
Not entirely sure I get your drift here, but I suspect it is from the "AirTran is just like SWA circa 1990" argument. Other than fleet size, that is a highly debatable premise. An obvious difference, of course, is that SWA did not get purchased by another airline at that time. I'm sorry it happened to you guys. Believe me, if I had any power to undo this deal, I would. SWAPA pilots hate it just as much as ATN pilots do. Most of us are getting over it and trying to move forward.

Most of us would be able to hold Captain just fine, if our seniority wasn't taken from us at gunpoint.
Yes, I know. We've been through this a million times before. Bottom line was that neither SWAPA nor ATN-ALPA had much leverage in these negotiations. SWA held all the cards....accept that fact or take effective action in managing the future of your career (Hint: whining on an airline forum is not effective action in managing your career).

The top two thirds of our Captains were hired 1994-2001. The most junior SWA Capt is a 2004 hire. Get your facts straight, Pal.
Show me where they're skewed? Keep in mind my comments were addressed to WM, specifically. While I do not know his ATN DOH or upgrade date, my only point has been that when he chooses to cross over and become a SWA FO, he will not have to take a paycut. If he has such a colossal ego that he cannot handle being an FO again, then that is his problem to resolve....can't help him there. If he is one of those 1994-2001 ATN captains you reference, then he will not be a SWA FO for very long, and will enjoy a whopping pay RAISE come 2015. If he's a very junior ATN captain, he probably won't be able to hold captain at SWA for quite a while. That's where my earlier comment about YOUR MEC and MC's role is directed: If they had not grossly overplayed their hand and told SWA to pound sand after the first AIP, WM's captain seat would have had a MUCH greater chance of being saved. Now, it is what it is....
Smokey23 is offline  
Old 09-09-2013, 09:18 AM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MaxPowers's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 127
Default

Originally Posted by Smokey23

Show me where they're skewed? Keep in mind my comments were addressed to WM, specifically. While I do not know his ATN DOH or upgrade date, my only point has been that when he chooses to cross over and become a SWA FO, he will not have to take a paycut.
I'll let WM speak for himself, but let's just say that he knows what his paystubs look like from both airlines. Like WM, most of the AAI Captains who transitioned to SWA report earning less, with the exception of those who live in a SWA Pilot base and pick up extra flying at premium. . . . clearly, not a valid data point.


Originally Posted by Smokey23
If he is one of those 1994-2001 ATN captains you reference, then he will not be a SWA FO for very long, and will enjoy a whopping pay RAISE come 2015.
Smokey, maybe you haven't visited the seniority calculator at myseniority.com but I certainly have, and due to the front-loading of CA positions (MOU between SWAPA and SWA currently headed for Dispute Resolution) a mid-seniority AAI Captain, like myself (bidding around 60% on the CA list at AAI) will not be able to re-upgrade until 2018-19. At that point, btw, I'll be an 18 year employee. . . . "Re-upgrading" into a seat I held for 10 years. . . . . Schweet.

Originally Posted by Smokey23
. .. . That's where my earlier comment about YOUR MEC and MC's role is directed: If they had not grossly overplayed their hand and told SWA to pound sand after the first AIP, WM's captain seat would have had a MUCH greater chance of being saved. Now, it is what it is....
Well, that may be how you choose to look at it; another way might be:

"There was a Process Agreement that was agreed to by SWA, SWAPA and ALPA. SWA decided not to follow the PA, and instead told the AAI Pilots to agree to a lopsided agreement, or face the loss of their jobs".

You are right that arguing about this stuff won't change it, but every time you (or someone else) tries to convince us of your version, you can expect to hear our side of it right back.

Last edited by MaxPowers; 09-09-2013 at 09:29 AM.
MaxPowers is offline  
Old 09-09-2013, 10:23 AM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 682
Default

Originally Posted by MaxPowers
You are right that arguing about this stuff won't change it, but every time you (or someone else) tries to convince us of your version, you can expect to hear our side of it right back.
Fair enough, Max. See you on the line...if that's the option you choose for your future.
Smokey23 is offline  
Old 09-09-2013, 02:32 PM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Frank Rizzo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: 717 Capt.
Posts: 248
Default

If he is one of those 1994-2001 ATN captains you reference, then he will not be a SWA FO for very long, and will enjoy a whopping pay RAISE come 2015.
1994-2001 hire, that's me. Can you guarantee me a "whopping raise" like my whopping seniority loss is guaranteed?

Your CBA has a 100% chance of changing going forward, my seniority does not. If history is any guide, you guys will eventually give concessions, if not Gary will take them. Right now he's saying "flattish". Next time it might be different. BTW, when I do get to re-upgrade, after I take a significant pay cut, I'll be going from my $185/hr AT rate to what? Like $210/hr? Not exactly "whopping" in my opinion.
Frank Rizzo is offline  
Old 09-10-2013, 06:17 AM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MaxPowers's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 127
Default

Originally Posted by Frank Rizzo
1994-2001 hire, that's me. Can you guarantee me a "whopping raise" like my whopping seniority loss is guaranteed?

Your CBA has a 100% chance of changing going forward, my seniority does not. If history is any guide, you guys will eventually give concessions, if not Gary will take them. Right now he's saying "flattish". Next time it might be different. BTW, when I do get to re-upgrade, after I take a significant pay cut, I'll be going from my $185/hr AT rate to what? Like $210/hr? Not exactly "whopping" in my opinion.
Cheer up, at least you'll have OAK to look forward to.
MaxPowers is offline  
Old 09-10-2013, 08:34 AM
  #89  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Frank Rizzo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: 717 Capt.
Posts: 248
Default

Originally Posted by MaxPowers
Cheer up, at least you'll have OAK to look forward to.
That's cute. You should really enjoy being my FO.

I guess when you can't make a coherent argument, just be a }i€k.
Frank Rizzo is offline  
Old 09-10-2013, 10:34 AM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MaxPowers's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 127
Default

Originally Posted by Frank Rizzo
That's cute. You should really enjoy being my FO.

I guess when you can't make a coherent argument, just be a }i€k.
Uh, did I forget to put the "dripping with sarcasm" icon in my post?

I'm on the same side of the partition, killer . . . And if you and I are here long enough for you to be my CA . . . well, then we'd probably be the last two pilots on the property.

You're senior to me, so don't forget to turn out the lights on your way out.
MaxPowers is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lolwut
Major
1144
09-18-2013 10:22 PM
LCAL dude
United
17
10-02-2012 03:02 PM
Clue32
Military
8
09-19-2009 05:09 PM
Coffee Bitch
Cargo
115
05-23-2007 09:02 AM
Sir James
Major
100
05-12-2007 01:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices