Search

Notices

SWA to open ATL Base

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-05-2013, 11:11 AM
  #101  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,803
Default

Originally Posted by 1Seat 1Engine
But I'm sure when they talk to PCL and WM, the grand inquisitors, they're telling the "real" truth.

Who cares? I got spreadsheets, you got spreadsheets, everybody got spreadsheets. Whoopdiefreakindoo.

Yeah, they probably are. Why would one of our own pilots not talk candidly about their feelings on the SLI with us? They've got nothing to hide, as opposed to spouting off their opinions to the wrong person at SWA and risk being "labeled" with the subsequent ramifications that all that entails.

His point about the spreadsheets is that the reps at the smaller bases (MCO & MKE....where it was actually feasible to do so) covered their ass by calling every pilot they represented and asked them personally how they wanted them to handle the first AIP, whether to put it out for vote or send it right back.
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Old 01-05-2013, 11:15 AM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,803
Default

WRT your comment about the MKE guys being "different", keep in mind that many of them in that base are ex-ATA. To say that they're a little less than enamored with all things SWA would be a severe understatement.
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Old 01-05-2013, 11:57 AM
  #103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
1Seat 1Engine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 737 Right
Posts: 1,385
Default

Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
Yeah, they probably are. Why would one of our own pilots not talk candidly about their feelings on the SLI with us?
Really?

Do you really believe everything you say?
1Seat 1Engine is offline  
Old 01-05-2013, 02:46 PM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,803
Default

Originally Posted by 1Seat 1Engine
Really?

Do you really believe everything you say?
LMFAO. You can't be seriously asking me that, but if you are then the answer is "yes".
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Old 01-05-2013, 04:07 PM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
yoke jerker's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 175
Default

as opposed to spouting off their own opinions to the wrong person at SWA and risk being "labeled" with the subsequent ramifications that entails
..

what would his label be? "counter revolutionary"...... "revisionist"
"anti bolshevik"......geez...where are the southwest torture chambers?..oh yeah the sim during the checkride..


just make him put a dollar into a jar in ground school every time he says "at airtran we used to do it this way"

btw ..im a SWA frequent flyer....be nice.
yoke jerker is offline  
Old 01-05-2013, 04:18 PM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,803
Default

Originally Posted by yoke jerker
..

what would his label be? "counter revolutionary"...... "revisionist"
"anti bolshevik"......geez...where are the southwest torture chambers?..oh yeah the sim during the checkride..


just make him put a dollar into a jar in ground school every time he says "at airtran we used to do it this way"

btw ..im a SWA frequent flyer....be nice.
First of all are you a SWA pilot? For anyone to deny that part of their CULTure is not tolerating bad-mouthing of the company is like saying that they don't have a history of taxiing fast and unstabilized approaches which lead to runway and taxiway excursions.
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Old 01-05-2013, 06:53 PM
  #107  
Gets Weekends Off
 
yoke jerker's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 175
Default

no one denied that employees who spread negative sentiment are cancers to any organization much less an airline...cancers have to be cut out or "radiated" or treated with "chemicals" to be eliminated and if you dont get the whole tumor, it can start growing and spreading again...

no denial here......personally, way too much complaining going on as i see it......you signed up for it when you "wanted to be an airline pilot"

but i am a frequent SWA customer and also a shareholder.......no i dont work there but have many friends who do....wish i did though...(i am a 737NG captain)
yoke jerker is offline  
Old 01-06-2013, 08:02 AM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Posts: 166
Default

As far as 1S1E's "day of reckoning" warnings go I want to point out that many SWA pilots openly bash Gary Kelly along with SWA Management as well as SWAPA on our union forum with just as much vigor as WM and others do here behind the cloak of a screen name. *I've never heard of anyone getting "special treatment" for an internet rant calling SWA management or SWAPA a bunch of cheats/crooks/liars/morons/etc.
V169 is offline  
Old 01-06-2013, 09:13 AM
  #109  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: 737 F.O.
Posts: 180
Default

Originally Posted by PCL_128
The MKE pilots overwhelmingly told their representatives to vote against the first deal. Probably more overwhelmingly than the Atlanta pilots, in fact.
You mean these Atlanta pilots that made this statement in their BREACH OF THE DUTY OF FAIR REPRESENTATION lawsuit against ALPA in 2012? "About three quarters of Atlanta-based pilots voted, by October 11, 2011, to recall three Atlanta MEC representatives who had voted to disapprove the earlier seniority integration package." Is that the same 3/4 majority of pilots that overwhelmingly told their reps to vote against the first deal before they decided to vote them out of office for doing so?

http://ia700806.us.archive.org/25/it...181455.1.0.pdf
CRJAV8OR is offline  
Old 01-06-2013, 02:50 PM
  #110  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,803
Default

Originally Posted by CRJAV8OR
You mean these Atlanta pilots that made this statement in their BREACH OF THE DUTY OF FAIR REPRESENTATION lawsuit against ALPA in 2012? "About three quarters of Atlanta-based pilots voted, by October 11, 2011, to recall three Atlanta MEC representatives who had voted to disapprove the earlier seniority integration package." Is that the same 3/4 majority of pilots that overwhelmingly told their reps to vote against the first deal before they decided to vote them out of office for doing so?

http://ia700806.us.archive.org/25/it...181455.1.0.pdf
Not quite so simplified. The situation was more like this. The pilots that let their voices be heard, whether it be by email, text, voice, what have you, overwhelmingly told the reps to send it back. It kind of makes perfect sense. These were the guys that were most ****ed about how bad the first offer was so logically they're the ones that wanted to voice their opinions the most.

The reps simply listened to the pilots that actually bothered to let their voices be heard. The majority of those were telling them to shove the POS back across the table. They followed the bylaws and didn't do anything wrong. The lawsuit is completely frivolous. The pilots involved in it collectively should have spoken up more.
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
757Driver
United
44
03-06-2011 10:07 AM
Runaway trim
Regional
83
10-18-2008 05:26 PM
Atwoo155
Cargo
14
08-31-2008 10:10 AM
Flitestar
Regional
14
06-09-2008 05:07 PM
buffalopilot
Regional
18
05-03-2007 09:06 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices