Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
The question still remains >

The question still remains

Search

Notices

The question still remains

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-24-2011, 01:18 AM
  #151  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: CA
Posts: 1,207
Default

Originally Posted by buzzpat
If I'd wanted to fly for SWA, I'd be flying for SWA. Thanks anyway. We'll take you on here. Any day.
I guess you mean Alaska will take us on there. Is that correct?
shoelu is offline  
Old 10-24-2011, 04:43 AM
  #152  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 478
Default

"LUVers" congrats on spinning the subject away from the truth. Yes DAL has crappy scope, many code shares, lower rates, less vacation, crappier trips etc etc. At night we ALL sleep comfortably knowing we (DAL or NWA) did not make an unabashed seniority grab during the merger. We approach each other as equal and appreciated professional co-workers. Co-workers that are not on separate pay scales or that don't have the same right and ability to upgrade as everyone else.

Keep on bringing tangental arguments to the discussion. I find them quite entertaining and humorous.
Rather B Fishin is offline  
Old 10-24-2011, 06:07 AM
  #153  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Rather B Fishin
"LUVers" congrats on spinning the subject away from the truth. Yes DAL has crappy scope, many code shares, lower rates, less vacation, crappier trips etc etc. At night we ALL sleep comfortably knowing we (DAL or NWA) did not make an unabashed seniority grab during the merger. We approach each other as equal and appreciated professional co-workers. Co-workers that are not on separate pay scales or that don't have the same right and ability to upgrade as everyone else.

Keep on bringing tangental arguments to the discussion. I find them quite entertaining and humorous.

Well said sir!
tsquare is offline  
Old 10-24-2011, 06:16 AM
  #154  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by shoelu
You want to know who is afraid of arbitration, it is GK.

If you folks knew anything about our contract, you would know that it does not allow codeshare, period. Let that sink in for a moment. OUR SECTION 1 DOES NOT ALLOW ANY FORM OF DOMESTIC CODE SHARE! It does not allow anyone to fly our passengers that are not on the SWAPA master seniority list. That includes wholly owned subsidiaries. There is a waiver for 24 months if an acqusition takes place. We are more than 25% through that time frame already.

What happens to this grand experiment when that 24 months is up and we do not yet have a fully finalized and integrated group?

Now can you see a sense of urgency for management to get a negotiated deal? Oh wait a minute, I am sure you can't because you are still trying to wrap your head around the fact that some groups won't sell their scope. How is the Alaska arrangement working out by the way? Maybe your LA boys can hold on long enough for our LA base to open up then shoot an application our way.
So basically then, SWAPA is afraid of GK. Now THAT is interesting. You guys ARE (as someone else put it in an earlier discussion) playing checkers while GK plays chess. The fact that you got no contract improvement for going along with this (other than your seniority grab) bears this out. But down the road, this merger is going to cost your enterprise a good deal of coin. You have no more fuel hedges that give you any kind of advantage over the competition. The next step in this is either raise prices or start charging fees OR.. start looking for new revenue streams. That could be codeshare. Not saying it will be.. but it could. The fact of the matter is that SWA has not the cost advantages they used to have, your growth is coming to a screaming halt (as witnessed by this merger) so something has to give. Part of that will be your cozy relationship with management. Oscar gets it. He has even acknowledged that.

"These are the good old days" - Carly Simon
tsquare is offline  
Old 10-24-2011, 12:52 PM
  #155  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Rolf
Your only cool airplane was the powerpuff girls jet, and she is gone.
Oh whatever, like your 737 with the flight attendant painted on the side was a winner.

You know, the one with the flight attendant:



forgot to bid is offline  
Old 10-24-2011, 01:16 PM
  #156  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: CA
Posts: 1,207
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
So basically then, SWAPA is afraid of GK. Now THAT is interesting. You guys ARE (as someone else put it in an earlier discussion) playing checkers while GK plays chess. The fact that you got no contract improvement for going along with this (other than your seniority grab) bears this out. But down the road, this merger is going to cost your enterprise a good deal of coin. You have no more fuel hedges that give you any kind of advantage over the competition. The next step in this is either raise prices or start charging fees OR.. start looking for new revenue streams. That could be codeshare. Not saying it will be.. but it could. The fact of the matter is that SWA has not the cost advantages they used to have, your growth is coming to a screaming halt (as witnessed by this merger) so something has to give. Part of that will be your cozy relationship with management. Oscar gets it. He has even acknowledged that.

"These are the good old days" - Carly Simon
Where do you get this stuff? Where did I even come close to saying anything remotely close to we are afraid of GK? What I in fact said, and I quote: "You want to know who is afraid of arbitration, it is GK." If you missed the drift of my post I will be more specific. If this deal is not done within 24 months then SWA will be in direct violation of SWAPA section 1 scope. Section one violations do not get ignored. Section 1 violations get fast tracked for a very quick resolution.

As I said before SWAPA does not sell off our scope. GK needs a very quick deal to avoid violating our section 1. This is one of the many reasons he has been such a high pressure salesman of this deal. He needs this deal to go through in order to steer clear of a section 1 violation. Do you get it now or should I use smaller words?
shoelu is offline  
Old 10-24-2011, 03:19 PM
  #157  
Gets Weekends Off
 
1Seat 1Engine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 737 Right
Posts: 1,385
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
So basically then, SWAPA is afraid of GK. Now THAT is interesting. You guys ARE (as someone else put it in an earlier discussion) playing checkers while GK plays chess. The fact that you got no contract improvement for going along with this (other than your seniority grab) bears this out. But down the road, this merger is going to cost your enterprise a good deal of coin. You have no more fuel hedges that give you any kind of advantage over the competition. The next step in this is either raise prices or start charging fees OR.. start looking for new revenue streams. That could be codeshare. Not saying it will be.. but it could. The fact of the matter is that SWA has not the cost advantages they used to have, your growth is coming to a screaming halt (as witnessed by this merger) so something has to give. Part of that will be your cozy relationship with management. Oscar gets it. He has even acknowledged that.
Your crystal ball in this affair has been so far VERY myopic. Keep telling us "how it's gonna be" because you haven't been right about anything so far.
1Seat 1Engine is offline  
Old 10-24-2011, 03:34 PM
  #158  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

You guys are so fun...
tsquare is offline  
Old 10-24-2011, 04:57 PM
  #159  
Gets Weekends Off
 
buzzpat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Urban chicken rancher.
Posts: 6,070
Default

Originally Posted by 1Seat 1Engine
Your crystal ball in this affair has been so far VERY myopic. Keep telling us "how it's gonna be" because you haven't been right about anything so far.
Yours hasn't been all that hot either.
buzzpat is offline  
Old 10-24-2011, 06:23 PM
  #160  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by shoelu
Where do you get this stuff? Where did I even come close to saying anything remotely close to we are afraid of GK? What I in fact said, and I quote: "You want to know who is afraid of arbitration, it is GK." If you missed the drift of my post I will be more specific. If this deal is not done within 24 months then SWA will be in direct violation of SWAPA section 1 scope. Section one violations do not get ignored. Section 1 violations get fast tracked for a very quick resolution.

As I said before SWAPA does not sell off our scope. GK needs a very quick deal to avoid violating our section 1. This is one of the many reasons he has been such a high pressure salesman of this deal. He needs this deal to go through in order to steer clear of a section 1 violation. Do you get it now or should I use smaller words?
So you had a lot of leverage that you didn't use... Why didn't you get any contract improvements other than the forced seniority grab? It makes no sense.
tsquare is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RVSM Certified
Flight Schools and Training
22
02-27-2009 12:04 PM
USMCFLYR
Military
16
08-28-2008 09:15 PM
USMCFLYR
Hangar Talk
3
08-23-2008 08:37 PM
cargo hopeful
Cargo
21
03-05-2006 06:12 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices