Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
Relevance of 717 to SWA continues to diminish >

Relevance of 717 to SWA continues to diminish

Search

Notices

Relevance of 717 to SWA continues to diminish

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-05-2011, 08:13 AM
  #121  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by The Duke
Andy:

I check in every couple days to read the threads here on APC and just wanted to pass along that I have really enjoyed reading your posts over the last several days. Talk about grounded in reality, level-headed posts. You definitely sound like a person who has weathered 2 furloughs and, consequently, have a cynical outlook on labor/management relations in our industry.
Thanks. I realize that the probability of some of what I write is currently small percentagewise. However, the airlines have Plan B, C, and D sitting on the shelf. Depending on how things proceed, the probability of those scenarios rise or fall.

My dad was a lawyer for CAB and then ATA. I remember going on business vacations and playing with the children of high level execs at American, United, Continental, TWA, Eastern, Pan Am, and Northwest. The fathers would have their meetings and we'd play on the beaches in Barbados or the Canary Islands.
For the most part, the airlines work together. You just don't want to be the wounded animal ... I remember how Crandall took down Braniff by holding onto the tickets from Braniff passengers that were rebooked on American and then dropping ~a year's worth of them at one time. Braniff had a cash flow problem for quite a while; Crandall's action pushed Braniff over the edge. Of course that was likely payback for Braniff's CEO, Howard Putnam, tape recording a phone conversation with Crandall where Crandall discussed both carriers raising ticket prices.
This can be a very nasty business. If you or I can think of any of these scenarios, it's likely that an airline lawyer has already done a rough outline on executing such a plan.

Originally Posted by sailingfun
No he does not. He is trolling.
My apologies. I realize that what I have written recently can be offensive to AirTran pilots. It's not intended that way; it's more to discuss the possible ways that this can play out. What happens to you guys may or may not be fair. Unfortunately, the airline business, much like life, is not fair.
I remember well how some would openly discuss the pieces of United that they wanted to have their airline acquire back in 2003. It wasn't a pleasant time for me to read airline pilot boards.
This too shall pass.

Last edited by Andy; 09-05-2011 at 08:43 AM.
Andy is offline  
Old 09-05-2011, 08:27 AM
  #122  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,046
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
I thought your phone had "god" like qualities?
Why yes, it does. It can even find another one of its own, unlike the lost prototype iPhone. Thus avoiding the need to ransack a private citizen's home under the force of the "authorities."

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 09-05-2011 at 09:09 AM.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 09-05-2011, 08:58 AM
  #123  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ferd149's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: LAX ERA
Posts: 3,457
Default

...................................

Out of the mud Ferd, stay out of the mud
Ferd149 is offline  
Old 09-05-2011, 09:21 AM
  #124  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Why yes, it does. It can even find another one of its own, unlike the lost prototype iPhone. Thus avoiding the need to ransack a private citizen's home under the force of the "authorities."
But if he "had nothing to hide" he should have no problem waiving his rights. That is, unless the proper authorities determine/interpret that those rights, which are mere courtesies granted by government in the first place, can be circumvented.

Ah, the delusional grandeur of functional tyrrany laced with intellectual sophistry.

In any case, Andy's little theory isn't insulting to AT pilots, its a dig at DL pilots. Because in his theory, AT pilots will have a home either way, but he thinks it will be in a manner that results in 1000 DL pilots being furloughed so that 1000 AT pilots can slide on over to DL with a metal neutral aircraft/delivery swap so the almighty SW can run 1000 proper, culturally vetted and worthy pilots through new hire training at least being able to partially cleanse the stain of the unworthy from their ranks. OK on second thought it is a bit insulting to the AT pilots as well. Gotta give him credit for drinking the SW kool aid when he's not even there though.

The fulcrum of his theory is that AT pilots lack the scope and merger language to force the issue if SW does the "seperate certificate trick" with a direct assett transfer in an outright 100% buyout, but if an ALPA carrier ends up with some of the current AT metal one day, ALPA merger policy will dictate that in all cases that is defined as a fragmentation and they can slide on over with them in all cases. And besided, GK will wheel and deal to cleanse 1000 unworthy AT pilots from his beloved airline and DL management will agree because they will do anything to get the 717's.
gloopy is offline  
Old 09-05-2011, 09:48 AM
  #125  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Maybe someone can help me out. Anyone:


Didn't all four parties,

1.) SWA Management,
2.) SWAPA,
3.) AT pilots, &
4.) AT ex-management(??).),

agree that after a certain date or trigger agree to go to binding arbitration to merge the seniority lists, if no negotiated settlement was reached?

If so, why is it that some believe that SWA will sell off parts of Air Tran?
newKnow is offline  
Old 09-05-2011, 09:58 AM
  #126  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
In any case, Andy's little theory isn't insulting to AT pilots, its a dig at DL pilots.
Perhaps the Delta pilots should not encourage their AirTran brothers to commit seppuku in public? Just a thought.

My original thoughts were that Southwest could sell all of the 717s to Air Wisonsin, American Eagle, Atlantic Southeast, Colgan, Compass or any other regional ALPA carrier whose contracts allowed it. But Delta appears to have a desire to get the 717s.

Originally Posted by newKnow
If so, why is it that some believe that SWA will sell off parts of Air Tran?
Because all airline management is ruthless and evil. Southwest management is no different; they just play the folksy routine. Herb has it down to a science.
Andy is offline  
Old 09-05-2011, 10:09 AM
  #127  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
Perhaps the Delta pilots should not encourage their AirTran brothers to commit seppuku in public? Just a thought.

My original thoughts were that Southwest could sell all of the 717s to Air Wisonsin, American Eagle, Atlantic Southeast, Colgan, Compass or any other regional ALPA carrier whose contracts allowed it. But Delta appears to have a desire to get the 717s.



Because all airline management is ruthless and evil. Southwest management is no different; they just play the folksy routine. Herb has it down to a science.

Who is asking them to commit seppuku in public? It's more to not fall for a ridiculous seniority grab. AT pilots standing up for themselves is not seppuku.

Your original thought of them selling the 717s to a regional carrier who's contracts allowed it show a fundamental misunderstanding of what is allowed. Republic is the only "regional" that operates large type aircraft, but they already parked all the 717s they could have had. Any of those carriers you listed could get the aircraft, sure... but they wouldn't have any one to fly them for.

Delta "may" have a desire to get the 717s, but they would be acquired after the return of them to Boeing as Southwest replaces them 1:1 with new 737s. Southwest and SWAPA already have signed the process agreement. The ball is rolling.


Agreed on your last statement.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 09-05-2011, 10:32 AM
  #128  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Who is asking them to commit seppuku in public? It's more to not fall for a ridiculous seniority grab. AT pilots standing up for themselves is not seppuku.
Unfortunately, many are assuming that an integrated seniority list MUST occur. While the odds may be small, there are ways around merging the seniority lists and there are ways to spin down Texas Sub, LLC without those assets being 'transferred' to Southwest.
As an example, Goldman Sachs could use a shell corporation - let's call it ScrewUAirAssets, LLC. ScrewUAirAssets could buy most/all of AirTran's assets from Texas Sub, LLC. Upon completion of that transaction, ScrewUAirAssets could turn around and lease any assets back to Southwest that they want. All the way down to lav pumpers. All of a sudden, a bunch of former AirTran/Texas Sub, LLC employees are out of a job.

I realize that a lot of people want to dismiss this as pure fantasy. But then answer me this - why did Southwest announce new service to ATL from LAS and PHX today? Looks like another not-so-subtle shot across the bow. Southwest Airlines Expands Atlanta Service With Two New Nonstop Destinations -- DALLAS, Sept. 5, 2011 /PRNewswire/ --

If, for some reason, Southwest doesn't integrate the AirTran employees, you can simply shrug your shoulders and say, 'Who would have ever thought that would have happened' and go back to your airline job.
Andy is offline  
Old 09-05-2011, 11:10 AM
  #129  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
Maybe someone can help me out. Anyone:


Didn't all four parties,

1.) SWA Management,
2.) SWAPA,
3.) AT pilots, &
4.) AT ex-management(??).),

agree that after a certain date or trigger agree to go to binding arbitration to merge the seniority lists, if no negotiated settlement was reached?

If so, why is it that some believe that SWA will sell off parts of Air Tran?
Scare tactics. Nothing more. SWA management is apparently negotiating on behalf of SWAPA. The field is not level, but payback's a biyatch. This will go much much deeper and have bigger ramifications if it goes down badly. JMHO
tsquare is offline  
Old 09-05-2011, 11:13 AM
  #130  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
Unfortunately, many are assuming that an integrated seniority list MUST occur. While the odds may be small, there are ways around merging the seniority lists and there are ways to spin down Texas Sub, LLC without those assets being 'transferred' to Southwest.
As an example, Goldman Sachs could use a shell corporation - let's call it ScrewUAirAssets, LLC. ScrewUAirAssets could buy most/all of AirTran's assets from Texas Sub, LLC. Upon completion of that transaction, ScrewUAirAssets could turn around and lease any assets back to Southwest that they want. All the way down to lav pumpers. All of a sudden, a bunch of former AirTran/Texas Sub, LLC employees are out of a job.

I realize that a lot of people want to dismiss this as pure fantasy. But then answer me this - why did Southwest announce new service to ATL from LAS and PHX today? Looks like another not-so-subtle shot across the bow. Southwest Airlines Expands Atlanta Service With Two New Nonstop Destinations -- DALLAS, Sept. 5, 2011 /PRNewswire/ --

If, for some reason, Southwest doesn't integrate the AirTran employees, you can simply shrug your shoulders and say, 'Who would have ever thought that would have happened' and go back to your airline job.
Not if you have the slightest knowledge of the Ichans and Lorenzos of this industry and what they did.... or if you are just ignorant and not paying attention...
tsquare is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SWAjet
Major
30
07-22-2007 08:36 PM
Sr. Barco
Major
10
06-29-2006 06:08 AM
corl737
Major
7
01-22-2006 10:05 PM
SWAjet
Major
44
01-19-2006 12:21 AM
KiloAlpha
Major
16
11-23-2005 01:39 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices