Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
AT and SWA SLI: How to make it work. >

AT and SWA SLI: How to make it work.

Search

Notices

AT and SWA SLI: How to make it work.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-25-2011, 11:22 AM
  #111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ClipperJet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 284
Default

Originally Posted by W0X0F
Oh then by all means break out the staplers and champaigne. But then see how many of those lifetime FOs put in their applications at DAL or UCAL while they watch those pay rates fly by the ones they are going get for the forseeable future.
Oh, I'm not advocating a staple, just showing how the "pay doesn't matter, seniority does" and "they won't factor in pay" arguments fall short.

If ex-AirTran FOs will leave SWA in droves for more money, which airlines pay more than SWA? Where will they be going?
ClipperJet is offline  
Old 08-25-2011, 11:30 AM
  #112  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,046
Default

Originally Posted by LuvJockey
Does ALPA national have a policy about what happens when aircraft from one ALPA carrier are sold to another ALPA carrier regarding integration of aircrews?
Isn't that "self help" and just as illegal as an illegal work stoppage?
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 08-25-2011, 11:31 AM
  #113  
Line Holder
 
W0X0F's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 31
Default

Originally Posted by ClipperJet
Oh, I'm not advocating a staple, just showing how the "pay doesn't matter, seniority does" and "they won't factor in pay" arguments fall short.

If ex-AirTran FOs will leave SWA in droves for more money, which airlines pay more than SWA? Where will they be going?

You honestly think that SWA rates are going to be top of the heap when DAL and UCAL finish their next contracts? Really? The bottom guys at DAL right now are 7ER FOs. YOu think those rates are going to be below SWA's 737 FO rates? SWA are going right back to where they have always been in the pecking order. But the argument is moot right now. Come back in 2 years and we'll talk. I'll even help you with your app.
W0X0F is offline  
Old 08-25-2011, 11:33 AM
  #114  
Works Every Weekend
 
Check Essential's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 737 ATL
Posts: 3,506
Default

Originally Posted by ClipperJet
Exactly...AirTran pilots were willing sacrifice all their seniority to start at the bottom of the SWA list for..wait for it...MONEY! That makes the pay raises at SWA very relevant.
Money is always a factor. Certainly won't be the only one though.
Arbitrators always reject a simplistic comparison of last year's W-2s in creating the combined list. Here's what the Delta seniority ruling said about taking past or present circumstances and projecting them into the future:

On the one hand, dealing with the future prospects of anything in the airline
industry is nothing short of reading tea leaves or, to cite a far more daunting venture, predicting fuel prices. On the other hand, those sorts of assessments are the stuff of which “career expectations” are made. Therefore, it is appropriate that one examine possibilities and potentials to whatever extent is reasonable, in the course of constructing a merged seniority list that is fair and equitable.
...
An integrated list that responds solely to statistical absolutes (for example), with no broader view of the short and long-term impact on career expectations, might be considered nominally fair but realistically inequitable. Too, a process that ignores reality and bypasses facts, that pursues, instead, an illusory notion of “something for everyone,” could hardly be fair.
In constructing this list, we have inquired as to where the respective groups
have been and we have made reasoned judgments as to where they were going. We have attempted, at all times, to recognize reasonable expectations of both parties while, in all instances, rejecting proposals that, however facially logical, resulted in untenable windfalls.
The resulting list neither realizes nor maintains each and every career
expectations, nor could it do so. No recitation of career expectations ever includes a merger, and no merger can leave all hopes and plans unaffected.


Check Essential is offline  
Old 08-25-2011, 12:35 PM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
nwaf16dude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 737A
Posts: 1,890
Default

Originally Posted by W0X0F
You honestly think that SWA rates are going to be top of the heap when DAL and UCAL finish their next contracts? Really? The bottom guys at DAL right now are 7ER FOs. YOu think those rates are going to be below SWA's 737 FO rates? SWA are going right back to where they have always been in the pecking order. But the argument is moot right now. Come back in 2 years and we'll talk. I'll even help you with your app.
I don't think having new hires in the ER FO seat says anything good about our contract. It mostly tells you that being an ER FO on reserve really sucks. If we get a decent raise and improve the reserve rules significantly, the bottom guys at Delta will not be 7ER FOs anymore.
nwaf16dude is offline  
Old 08-25-2011, 12:49 PM
  #116  
Line Holder
 
W0X0F's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 31
Default

Originally Posted by nwaf16dude
I don't think having new hires in the ER FO seat says anything good about our contract. It mostly tells you that being an ER FO on reserve really sucks. If we get a decent raise and improve the reserve rules significantly, the bottom guys at Delta will not be 7ER FOs anymore.
Unless they get bumped and until we hire, they still will be. But the point is that those rates are an aberration and that even the lowly M88FOs (no offense intended) are gonna be making more than SWA FOs after the next contract. THAT was my point.
W0X0F is offline  
Old 08-25-2011, 01:19 PM
  #117  
gets time off
 
mulcher's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,240
Default

I sure hope you are right. It will help us get more then 3%.
mulcher is offline  
Old 08-25-2011, 01:51 PM
  #118  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Position: 737 ca
Posts: 6
Default

wow have i been naive. i was under the initial impression when sw bought us, that swapa and airtran pilots would have some ligitimate differences in seniority integration, try to work them out, and if not , have an arbitrator decide it for us. we would go through this process with respect for our fellow aviators flying the other color airplanes. instead, and very sadly so, It seems that swapa leadership has been acting as if we are an enemy. I hope they realize we will all be one pilot group at some point. wouldn't it be nice if they could keep this in mind before rallying the troops against us. Also, GK seems to be standing behind them as if whatever they offer should be welcomed without question. One Luv hah
The only reason our intigration team voted yes, was because swapa has decided not to look at precedent of other airline mergers by stuffing this rediculous list down our throat (i would lose 4years 3months, and 30% relative seniority)and the big dog in the room made (option b threats). the yes vote was a fear vote. our mec did the right thing. hopefully it is the smart thing. bottom line is we all have familly's and want security for them. putting fear into your future fellow crewmembers is not the right thing to do. They say they dont want their culture ruined. well as far as i can tell SW pilots were not always SW pilots. they did a pretty good job conforming. i'm sure we can too. unless ofcourse we are treated like second class citizens before given the privelege.
sorry for rant. would just like to be treated with respect while the agreed upon integration process follows its intended path. I'm sure it will all work out in the end. weather SWAPA leadership wants to admit it or not, we do bring alot to the table, and as GK has stated, this merger/aquisition will bring much needed growth to SW.
j3beech18 is offline  
Old 08-25-2011, 02:45 PM
  #119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
1Seat 1Engine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 737 Right
Posts: 1,385
Default

The company respected you enough offer $200+/hr on a 119 seat airplane.

You turned it down. Now it's doubtful that offer will return.

You really think this is about respect?
1Seat 1Engine is offline  
Old 08-25-2011, 02:56 PM
  #120  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: DC9 CA
Posts: 99
Default

Originally Posted by 1Seat 1Engine
The company respected you enough offer $200+/hr on a 119 seat airplane.

You turned it down. Now it's doubtful that offer will return.

You really think this is about respect?
So, as we can see, money is all these guys really care about.

BTW, what is the rate for the 500? How about the 800?
JohnDeere is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices