AirTran MEC Rejects SLI proposal
#302
3. This is a big point -- the 10 year fence in ATL. Sounds great, but when you consider that all Airtran pilots would be initially based in ATL and that SWA intends to shrink the ATL base down to 850 pilots, that means that half of the Airtran guys would be based wherever their reduced seniority would hold outside ATL.
Also, the ATL fence could create additional Capt upgrades for former AT FO's senior enough to hold ATL.
Consider also that SWA Capts could be displaced as a result of ATL being downsized.
4. Pay vs. QOL. Always a challenging topic to go into, but many Airtran pilots would be taking the pay raise in exchange for being on reserve at bases possibly far away from their homes. And, as you accurately mentioned, who knows what happens (with pay rates) tomorrow? To put it another way, how much more money would someone have to pay you to give up seniority and QOL?
Both sides have disparate positions. Both sides think they are being reasonable and that the other side is being unreasonable. In the end, something will have to give. It would be awfully nice if this thing gets resolved in mediation ... I remain hopeful.
Both sides have disparate positions. Both sides think they are being reasonable and that the other side is being unreasonable. In the end, something will have to give. It would be awfully nice if this thing gets resolved in mediation ... I remain hopeful.
I'm hoping that the mediators bring some impartial reality into this discussion. These affairs are an interesting study in group-think.
One thing I would expect is for SWA management to continue to be active in the process. It's not at all their style to sit back and let labor issues sort themselves out. For better or worse, the company will be involved.
Last edited by 1Seat 1Engine; 08-22-2011 at 07:43 PM.
#304
1Seat - I agree that lots of AT folks that currently commute would welcome the chance to commute to someplace closer (or not at all in PHX). The flip side is lots of guys who don't currently commute will be forced to because the ATL base was being reduced and their proposed seniority was taking such a hit they would be forced to chase RSV lines around the system for the next 10 years.
Your comment about creating CA slots for AT FO's is off because the failed ISL didn't allow ANY AT FO's to upgrade (on either side of the fence) until the last SWA FO had the opportunity to upgrade.
Pay and benefits have tremendous value. It was the opinion of the MEC that seniority had more value than the pay and benefits, in this case.
It's just the 1st step in a 3 step process.
Your comment about creating CA slots for AT FO's is off because the failed ISL didn't allow ANY AT FO's to upgrade (on either side of the fence) until the last SWA FO had the opportunity to upgrade.
Pay and benefits have tremendous value. It was the opinion of the MEC that seniority had more value than the pay and benefits, in this case.
It's just the 1st step in a 3 step process.
#306
What was the financial sweetner in that package anyways? Pay increases? Were they not going to come anyways for FL pilots?
I still think the financial sweetner should've been on the SWA pilot side to accept a less staple like ISL.
I still think the financial sweetner should've been on the SWA pilot side to accept a less staple like ISL.
#307
He may not be a 14 year old boy, and he is definitely a successful leader, but he is clearly not pleased with the recent turn of events. Here are a few quotes from his most recent communication to SWA and AT pilots:
"I am writing you today to let you know my thoughts on the ALPA MEC decision not to put the proposed agreement out to a vote"..."I was disappointed that the ALPA MEC chose to reject the offer. In my opinion,
the preferred way to a fair and equitable solution is through negotiation, not arbitration. All Pilots should have their say in their future. Since a negotiated agreement has not been reached, despite our best efforts, we will continue to consider all other options, in addition to arbitration. Our decision will be based on what is best for our People, our business, and our Culture. As the first of our next steps, we have withdrawn our economic offer of support for the SLI package. Due to the worsened economic environment this summer, coupled with the fact that the SLI can no longer be expedited, we cannot afford the previous offer"..."We made clear that if an expedited agreement could not be reached, we would revaluate our plan in light of worsening economic conditions"..."Simply put, reevaluating the integration plan is mandatory in this economic climate"..."AirTran has been bought and is now owned by Southwest"..."The Company certainly made a generous economic offer to facilitate the seniority list"..."That said, we now find ourselves with a stalled economic recovery, a cloudy outlook for air travel, and 40 percent higher (and record) energy costs. Those realities cannot be ignored."
"I am writing you today to let you know my thoughts on the ALPA MEC decision not to put the proposed agreement out to a vote"..."I was disappointed that the ALPA MEC chose to reject the offer. In my opinion,
the preferred way to a fair and equitable solution is through negotiation, not arbitration. All Pilots should have their say in their future. Since a negotiated agreement has not been reached, despite our best efforts, we will continue to consider all other options, in addition to arbitration. Our decision will be based on what is best for our People, our business, and our Culture. As the first of our next steps, we have withdrawn our economic offer of support for the SLI package. Due to the worsened economic environment this summer, coupled with the fact that the SLI can no longer be expedited, we cannot afford the previous offer"..."We made clear that if an expedited agreement could not be reached, we would revaluate our plan in light of worsening economic conditions"..."Simply put, reevaluating the integration plan is mandatory in this economic climate"..."AirTran has been bought and is now owned by Southwest"..."The Company certainly made a generous economic offer to facilitate the seniority list"..."That said, we now find ourselves with a stalled economic recovery, a cloudy outlook for air travel, and 40 percent higher (and record) energy costs. Those realities cannot be ignored."
I would like to see TS, Carl, and you FTB! You are the new lawyer right (congrats). I believe the arbitration panel is supposed to have 3 members.
There might even be new standards for seniority integration such as...... being drawn and quartered, the use of gallows, etc.
I'll get some popcorn!
The Troll (AKA Oscar)
There might even be new standards for seniority integration such as...... being drawn and quartered, the use of gallows, etc.
I'll get some popcorn!
The Troll (AKA Oscar)
#308
#309
That deal is gone. Now all we have is the promise of an "opener" for 717's. As there is certainly going to be an equipment lock on that airplane for a long time, my guess is motivation will be low for us to bring that pay rate up. (This is not MY recommendation, just my observation).
Also up to a 2 year longevity boost in pay for senior FO's. Sliding scale applied to the most senior dudes, some got 1 month, and some got 24 months of extra pay.
#310
Financial sweetener was 737 pay for 717's, enabled by the company to happen earlier.
That deal is gone. Now all we have is the promise of an "opener" for 717's. As there is certainly going to be an equipment lock on that airplane for a long time, my guess is motivation will be low for us to bring that pay rate up. (This is not MY recommendation, just my observation).
Also up to a 2 year longevity boost in pay for senior FO's. Sliding scale applied to the most senior dudes, some got 1 month, and some got 24 months of extra pay.
That deal is gone. Now all we have is the promise of an "opener" for 717's. As there is certainly going to be an equipment lock on that airplane for a long time, my guess is motivation will be low for us to bring that pay rate up. (This is not MY recommendation, just my observation).
Also up to a 2 year longevity boost in pay for senior FO's. Sliding scale applied to the most senior dudes, some got 1 month, and some got 24 months of extra pay.
What about a joint contract now? Is one even necessary and if so, before or after the ISL is announced? And is it voted in separately?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Breton
Hangar Talk
0
06-24-2005 02:57 PM