Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
AirTran MEC Rejects SLI proposal >

AirTran MEC Rejects SLI proposal

Search

Notices

AirTran MEC Rejects SLI proposal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-22-2011, 03:01 PM
  #301  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 1
Default

Enter Content
suppe100 is offline  
Old 08-22-2011, 03:03 PM
  #302  
Gets Weekends Off
 
1Seat 1Engine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 737 Right
Posts: 1,385
Default

Originally Posted by Marvin
3. This is a big point -- the 10 year fence in ATL. Sounds great, but when you consider that all Airtran pilots would be initially based in ATL and that SWA intends to shrink the ATL base down to 850 pilots, that means that half of the Airtran guys would be based wherever their reduced seniority would hold outside ATL.
I can't remember the number but I was under the impression that a large percentage, more than 60%, of AT pilots are commuters. For example I know a couple of AT guys here in PHX who really have no desire to commute to ATL anymore anyway and sitting reserve here would be an improvement over holding a line there. Is it safe to say that for many AT dudes, leaving ATL would increase their QOL since SWA has so many more domiciles that may be convenient for them?

Also, the ATL fence could create additional Capt upgrades for former AT FO's senior enough to hold ATL.

Consider also that SWA Capts could be displaced as a result of ATL being downsized.

Originally Posted by Marvin
4. Pay vs. QOL. Always a challenging topic to go into, but many Airtran pilots would be taking the pay raise in exchange for being on reserve at bases possibly far away from their homes. And, as you accurately mentioned, who knows what happens (with pay rates) tomorrow? To put it another way, how much more money would someone have to pay you to give up seniority and QOL?

Both sides have disparate positions. Both sides think they are being reasonable and that the other side is being unreasonable. In the end, something will have to give. It would be awfully nice if this thing gets resolved in mediation ... I remain hopeful.
I realize that pay and benefits isn't everything, but it would be nice if we could at least acknowledge that it's worth something.

I'm hoping that the mediators bring some impartial reality into this discussion. These affairs are an interesting study in group-think.

One thing I would expect is for SWA management to continue to be active in the process. It's not at all their style to sit back and let labor issues sort themselves out. For better or worse, the company will be involved.

Last edited by 1Seat 1Engine; 08-22-2011 at 07:43 PM.
1Seat 1Engine is offline  
Old 08-22-2011, 03:03 PM
  #303  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by suppe100
Enter Content
Here, I'll help:

80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 08-22-2011, 03:46 PM
  #304  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MatthewAMEL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 751
Default

1Seat - I agree that lots of AT folks that currently commute would welcome the chance to commute to someplace closer (or not at all in PHX). The flip side is lots of guys who don't currently commute will be forced to because the ATL base was being reduced and their proposed seniority was taking such a hit they would be forced to chase RSV lines around the system for the next 10 years.

Your comment about creating CA slots for AT FO's is off because the failed ISL didn't allow ANY AT FO's to upgrade (on either side of the fence) until the last SWA FO had the opportunity to upgrade.

Pay and benefits have tremendous value. It was the opinion of the MEC that seniority had more value than the pay and benefits, in this case.

It's just the 1st step in a 3 step process.
MatthewAMEL is offline  
Old 08-22-2011, 06:50 PM
  #305  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Eric Stratton's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,002
Default

Anyone talking about a dynamic list in the SLI discussions?
Eric Stratton is offline  
Old 08-22-2011, 07:13 PM
  #306  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

What was the financial sweetner in that package anyways? Pay increases? Were they not going to come anyways for FL pilots?

I still think the financial sweetner should've been on the SWA pilot side to accept a less staple like ISL.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 08-22-2011, 07:17 PM
  #307  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by shoelu
He may not be a 14 year old boy, and he is definitely a successful leader, but he is clearly not pleased with the recent turn of events. Here are a few quotes from his most recent communication to SWA and AT pilots:

"I am writing you today to let you know my thoughts on the ALPA MEC decision not to put the proposed agreement out to a vote"..."I was disappointed that the ALPA MEC chose to reject the offer. In my opinion,
the preferred way to a fair and equitable solution is through negotiation, not arbitration. All Pilots should have their say in their future. Since a negotiated agreement has not been reached, despite our best efforts, we will continue to consider all other options, in addition to arbitration. Our decision will be based on what is best for our People, our business, and our Culture. As the first of our next steps, we have withdrawn our economic offer of support for the SLI package. Due to the worsened economic environment this summer, coupled with the fact that the SLI can no longer be expedited, we cannot afford the previous offer"..."We made clear that if an expedited agreement could not be reached, we would revaluate our plan in light of worsening economic conditions"..."Simply put, reevaluating the integration plan is mandatory in this economic climate"..."AirTran has been bought and is now owned by Southwest"..."The Company certainly made a generous economic offer to facilitate the seniority list"..."That said, we now find ourselves with a stalled economic recovery, a cloudy outlook for air travel, and 40 percent higher (and record) energy costs. Those realities cannot be ignored."
Sounds like a legacy airline CEO.

Originally Posted by OscartheGrouch
I would like to see TS, Carl, and you FTB! You are the new lawyer right (congrats). I believe the arbitration panel is supposed to have 3 members.

There might even be new standards for seniority integration such as...... being drawn and quartered, the use of gallows, etc.

I'll get some popcorn!

The Troll (AKA Oscar)
Not me, not the lawyer. I'm too busy with Angry Birds to study to be a lawyer.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 08-22-2011, 07:20 PM
  #308  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Here, I'll help:

The girl to guy ratio is definitely in her favor and she likes that.

I've been in her shoes, once I went to the beach and the girl to guy ratio was just as much in my favor:

forgot to bid is offline  
Old 08-22-2011, 07:41 PM
  #309  
Gets Weekends Off
 
1Seat 1Engine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 737 Right
Posts: 1,385
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
What was the financial sweetner in that package anyways? Pay increases? Were they not going to come anyways for FL pilots?

I still think the financial sweetner should've been on the SWA pilot side to accept a less staple like ISL.
Financial sweetener was 737 pay for 717's, enabled by the company to happen earlier.

That deal is gone. Now all we have is the promise of an "opener" for 717's. As there is certainly going to be an equipment lock on that airplane for a long time, my guess is motivation will be low for us to bring that pay rate up. (This is not MY recommendation, just my observation).

Also up to a 2 year longevity boost in pay for senior FO's. Sliding scale applied to the most senior dudes, some got 1 month, and some got 24 months of extra pay.
1Seat 1Engine is offline  
Old 08-22-2011, 07:47 PM
  #310  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by 1Seat 1Engine
Financial sweetener was 737 pay for 717's, enabled by the company to happen earlier.

That deal is gone. Now all we have is the promise of an "opener" for 717's. As there is certainly going to be an equipment lock on that airplane for a long time, my guess is motivation will be low for us to bring that pay rate up. (This is not MY recommendation, just my observation).

Also up to a 2 year longevity boost in pay for senior FO's. Sliding scale applied to the most senior dudes, some got 1 month, and some got 24 months of extra pay.
Interesting on the sliding longevity and 717 pay.

What about a joint contract now? Is one even necessary and if so, before or after the ISL is announced? And is it voted in separately?
forgot to bid is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bill Lumberg
Major
79
03-06-2011 07:31 AM
StormChaser
Major
378
08-10-2009 12:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
01-07-2006 03:24 PM
Freighter Captain
Atlas/Polar
0
09-24-2005 08:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices