Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
AirTran MEC Rejects SLI proposal >

AirTran MEC Rejects SLI proposal

Search

Notices

AirTran MEC Rejects SLI proposal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-22-2011, 11:28 AM
  #281  
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
SoCalGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
Default

Originally Posted by SWAPilotwife2
What's crap is your ability to use the shift key to start a sentence with a capital.
Originally Posted by scambo1
It's 5 oclock somewhere.
And the kitchen is empty

Couldn't resist.
SoCalGuy is offline  
Old 08-22-2011, 11:46 AM
  #282  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Marvin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: B-737 Right
Posts: 243
Default

Originally Posted by 1Seat 1Engine
... Some of the seniority boosts at SWA were overstated in the AIP. In no case did anyone have a real increase in seniority of over 9%. I know some of the stuff sent out said 12% when you checked the math, it included SWA new hires who would have increased our seniority regardless.

Additionally you couldn't "use" that seniority since all AT Capts (including those upgraded AFTER the announcement) were protected. In my case there were AT capts who would have been junior to me.

Add in equipment locks for the 717 and a 10 year fence for ATL and that seniority means even less.

In 10 years, when the fences came down, half of the seniority increases would have been eroded by the age differences between groups.

I know it's considered unprofessional to bring up the pay scales, but at some point, money has value. How much money vs how much seniority? On average the SWA contract would bring 2million more than the AT contract. Who knows what the future holds and what could happen tomorrow, but at some point, money has value. ...
The following statements are made without emotion -- I just thought the statements above needed comment:

1. For Airtran pilots, I am pretty sure it is accurate to say that 0% of the pilots would have had any seniority boost; almost all would have lost a great deal of seniority, most on the order of 30-something percent.

2. I think we upgraded 8 guys to Captain after the announcement -- fair point, but hardly worth mentioning, I think.

3. This is a big point -- the 10 year fence in ATL. Sounds great, but when you consider that all Airtran pilots would be initially based in ATL and that SWA intends to shrink the ATL base down to 850 pilots, that means that half of the Airtran guys would be based wherever their reduced seniority would hold outside ATL.

4. Pay vs. QOL. Always a challenging topic to go into, but many Airtran pilots would be taking the pay raise in exchange for being on reserve at bases possibly far away from their homes. And, as you accurately mentioned, who knows what happens (with pay rates) tomorrow? To put it another way, how much more money would someone have to pay you to give up seniority and QOL?

Both sides have disparate positions. Both sides think they are being reasonable and that the other side is being unreasonable. In the end, something will have to give. It would be awfully nice if this thing gets resolved in mediation ... I remain hopeful.
Marvin is offline  
Old 08-22-2011, 12:03 PM
  #283  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Why don't you guys pick 1 DAL pilot to arbitrate the merger?

I nominate... Tsquare or Carl.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 08-22-2011, 12:31 PM
  #284  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SWAcapt's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Position: B737, Capt.
Posts: 384
Default

Originally Posted by Marvin
To put it another way, how much more money would someone have to pay you to give up seniority and QOL?
Marvin, I'll take a shot at that. I think that on the date of announcement, the AT Capt pay scale was fairly close to our FO pay scale. So let's say about 50% better. About 10 years ago, I gave up a good schedule (Tu-W-Th) living in base in Dallas to sit reserve in Orlando on the weekends for a 50% pay increase. If you were able to offer me a 50% pay increase to move to another base and be on reserve, I'd do again.

Originally Posted by Marvin
Both sides have disparate positions. Both sides think they are being reasonable and that the other side is being unreasonable. In the end, something will have to give.
We were not that far apart considering we had an AIP. I do agree that each side views the other as unreasonable.


Originally Posted by Marvin
It would be awfully nice if this thing gets resolved in mediation ... I remain hopeful.
I think it's too late. There is currently nothing to mediate as the AIP no longer exists. After the MEC voted it down the company pulled the offer. I don't think we could start from scratch in the allotted time. Besides, all the money left the table. The only thing to discuss is "the list". I believe that it was the list and not the money that the MEC had a problem with. Unfortunately, it's out of the hands of us line pilots and most likely an arbitrator will assign our positions. Good luck to us all.
SWAcapt is offline  
Old 08-22-2011, 12:51 PM
  #285  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 853
Default

Airtran pilots just simply couldn't justify taking such a huge seniority loss in exchange for swapa's CBA, (which as history dictates, could look very different in 10 years). All they want now is to move to the next step of the process agreement which was agreed on by ALPA, SWAPA, and SWA. Unfortunetly, GK's announcement today made it seem as though he will not let it take it's course. For example; he said things like "if we decide to continue the integration", and " we may expore other options other than arbitration". SWAcapt, which direction do you see this heading?
fullflank is offline  
Old 08-22-2011, 12:53 PM
  #286  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: CA
Posts: 1,207
Default

Originally Posted by RCD73
The choice to not put the vote out to the membership was not meant as a slap in the face. I don't believe that GK would take it that way. He's an extremely successful leader, not a 14 year old boy. The decision was made in accordance with the agreements signed by both parties.

Regarding the alleged amounts of money lost due to AirTran pilots not signing this agreement; SWA planned in the AIP to begin crossing AirTran pilots over at the leisurely rate of 30 per month in April 2012. The Arbiters are required to give their decision in Jan/Feb 2012. SOC isn't planned until second quarter 2012. SWA control the time line for the synergies, not AirTran pilots.

Having already planned for April 2012 in the AIP, any delay after SOC or the ISL will be a matter of choice for SWA.
He may not be a 14 year old boy, and he is definitely a successful leader, but he is clearly not pleased with the recent turn of events. Here are a few quotes from his most recent communication to SWA and AT pilots:

"I am writing you today to let you know my thoughts on the ALPA MEC decision not to put the proposed agreement out to a vote"..."I was disappointed that the ALPA MEC chose to reject the offer. In my opinion,
the preferred way to a fair and equitable solution is through negotiation, not arbitration. All Pilots should have their say in their future. Since a negotiated agreement has not been reached, despite our best efforts, we will continue to consider all other options, in addition to arbitration. Our decision will be based on what is best for our People, our business, and our Culture. As the first of our next steps, we have withdrawn our economic offer of support for the SLI package. Due to the worsened economic environment this summer, coupled with the fact that the SLI can no longer be expedited, we cannot afford the previous offer"..."We made clear that if an expedited agreement could not be reached, we would revaluate our plan in light of worsening economic conditions"..."Simply put, reevaluating the integration plan is mandatory in this economic climate"..."AirTran has been bought and is now owned by Southwest"..."The Company certainly made a generous economic offer to facilitate the seniority list"..."That said, we now find ourselves with a stalled economic recovery, a cloudy outlook for air travel, and 40 percent higher (and record) energy costs. Those realities cannot be ignored."
shoelu is offline  
Old 08-22-2011, 12:59 PM
  #287  
Don't want to participate
 
LuvJockey's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: 737 Left Seat
Posts: 1,016
Default

Wow. In "southwest-ese" that's about as bad as it gets.
LuvJockey is offline  
Old 08-22-2011, 01:00 PM
  #288  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Rolf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Posts: 659
Default

He also said that Airtran jobs are safe. When this is over, I will have a sign-up sheet in the lounges to join a 12-step program of some kind.
Rolf is offline  
Old 08-22-2011, 01:32 PM
  #289  
Gets Weekends Off
 
OscartheGrouch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: B737/Capt
Posts: 998
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Why don't you guys pick 1 DAL pilot to arbitrate the merger?

I nominate... Tsquare or Carl.
I would like to see TS, Carl, and you FTB! You are the new lawyer right (congrats). I believe the arbitration panel is supposed to have 3 members.

There might even be new standards for seniority integration such as...... being drawn and quartered, the use of gallows, etc.

I'll get some popcorn!

The Troll (AKA Oscar)
OscartheGrouch is offline  
Old 08-22-2011, 01:37 PM
  #290  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Why don't you guys pick 1 DAL pilot to arbitrate the merger?

I nominate... Tsquare or Carl.
You wouldn't want me..
tsquare is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bill Lumberg
Major
79
03-06-2011 07:31 AM
StormChaser
Major
378
08-10-2009 12:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
01-07-2006 03:24 PM
Freighter Captain
Atlas/Polar
0
09-24-2005 08:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices