AirTran MEC Rejects SLI proposal
#281
Keep Calm Chive ON
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
#282
... Some of the seniority boosts at SWA were overstated in the AIP. In no case did anyone have a real increase in seniority of over 9%. I know some of the stuff sent out said 12% when you checked the math, it included SWA new hires who would have increased our seniority regardless.
Additionally you couldn't "use" that seniority since all AT Capts (including those upgraded AFTER the announcement) were protected. In my case there were AT capts who would have been junior to me.
Add in equipment locks for the 717 and a 10 year fence for ATL and that seniority means even less.
In 10 years, when the fences came down, half of the seniority increases would have been eroded by the age differences between groups.
I know it's considered unprofessional to bring up the pay scales, but at some point, money has value. How much money vs how much seniority? On average the SWA contract would bring 2million more than the AT contract. Who knows what the future holds and what could happen tomorrow, but at some point, money has value. ...
Additionally you couldn't "use" that seniority since all AT Capts (including those upgraded AFTER the announcement) were protected. In my case there were AT capts who would have been junior to me.
Add in equipment locks for the 717 and a 10 year fence for ATL and that seniority means even less.
In 10 years, when the fences came down, half of the seniority increases would have been eroded by the age differences between groups.
I know it's considered unprofessional to bring up the pay scales, but at some point, money has value. How much money vs how much seniority? On average the SWA contract would bring 2million more than the AT contract. Who knows what the future holds and what could happen tomorrow, but at some point, money has value. ...
1. For Airtran pilots, I am pretty sure it is accurate to say that 0% of the pilots would have had any seniority boost; almost all would have lost a great deal of seniority, most on the order of 30-something percent.
2. I think we upgraded 8 guys to Captain after the announcement -- fair point, but hardly worth mentioning, I think.
3. This is a big point -- the 10 year fence in ATL. Sounds great, but when you consider that all Airtran pilots would be initially based in ATL and that SWA intends to shrink the ATL base down to 850 pilots, that means that half of the Airtran guys would be based wherever their reduced seniority would hold outside ATL.
4. Pay vs. QOL. Always a challenging topic to go into, but many Airtran pilots would be taking the pay raise in exchange for being on reserve at bases possibly far away from their homes. And, as you accurately mentioned, who knows what happens (with pay rates) tomorrow? To put it another way, how much more money would someone have to pay you to give up seniority and QOL?
Both sides have disparate positions. Both sides think they are being reasonable and that the other side is being unreasonable. In the end, something will have to give. It would be awfully nice if this thing gets resolved in mediation ... I remain hopeful.
#284
I think it's too late. There is currently nothing to mediate as the AIP no longer exists. After the MEC voted it down the company pulled the offer. I don't think we could start from scratch in the allotted time. Besides, all the money left the table. The only thing to discuss is "the list". I believe that it was the list and not the money that the MEC had a problem with. Unfortunately, it's out of the hands of us line pilots and most likely an arbitrator will assign our positions. Good luck to us all.
#285
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 853
Airtran pilots just simply couldn't justify taking such a huge seniority loss in exchange for swapa's CBA, (which as history dictates, could look very different in 10 years). All they want now is to move to the next step of the process agreement which was agreed on by ALPA, SWAPA, and SWA. Unfortunetly, GK's announcement today made it seem as though he will not let it take it's course. For example; he said things like "if we decide to continue the integration", and " we may expore other options other than arbitration". SWAcapt, which direction do you see this heading?
#286
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: CA
Posts: 1,207
The choice to not put the vote out to the membership was not meant as a slap in the face. I don't believe that GK would take it that way. He's an extremely successful leader, not a 14 year old boy. The decision was made in accordance with the agreements signed by both parties.
Regarding the alleged amounts of money lost due to AirTran pilots not signing this agreement; SWA planned in the AIP to begin crossing AirTran pilots over at the leisurely rate of 30 per month in April 2012. The Arbiters are required to give their decision in Jan/Feb 2012. SOC isn't planned until second quarter 2012. SWA control the time line for the synergies, not AirTran pilots.
Having already planned for April 2012 in the AIP, any delay after SOC or the ISL will be a matter of choice for SWA.
Regarding the alleged amounts of money lost due to AirTran pilots not signing this agreement; SWA planned in the AIP to begin crossing AirTran pilots over at the leisurely rate of 30 per month in April 2012. The Arbiters are required to give their decision in Jan/Feb 2012. SOC isn't planned until second quarter 2012. SWA control the time line for the synergies, not AirTran pilots.
Having already planned for April 2012 in the AIP, any delay after SOC or the ISL will be a matter of choice for SWA.
"I am writing you today to let you know my thoughts on the ALPA MEC decision not to put the proposed agreement out to a vote"..."I was disappointed that the ALPA MEC chose to reject the offer. In my opinion,
the preferred way to a fair and equitable solution is through negotiation, not arbitration. All Pilots should have their say in their future. Since a negotiated agreement has not been reached, despite our best efforts, we will continue to consider all other options, in addition to arbitration. Our decision will be based on what is best for our People, our business, and our Culture. As the first of our next steps, we have withdrawn our economic offer of support for the SLI package. Due to the worsened economic environment this summer, coupled with the fact that the SLI can no longer be expedited, we cannot afford the previous offer"..."We made clear that if an expedited agreement could not be reached, we would revaluate our plan in light of worsening economic conditions"..."Simply put, reevaluating the integration plan is mandatory in this economic climate"..."AirTran has been bought and is now owned by Southwest"..."The Company certainly made a generous economic offer to facilitate the seniority list"..."That said, we now find ourselves with a stalled economic recovery, a cloudy outlook for air travel, and 40 percent higher (and record) energy costs. Those realities cannot be ignored."
#289
There might even be new standards for seniority integration such as...... being drawn and quartered, the use of gallows, etc.
I'll get some popcorn!
The Troll (AKA Oscar)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Breton
Hangar Talk
0
06-24-2005 02:57 PM