Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
AirTran MEC Rejects SLI proposal >

AirTran MEC Rejects SLI proposal

Search

Notices

AirTran MEC Rejects SLI proposal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-20-2011, 05:20 AM
  #151  
Works Every Weekend
 
Check Essential's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 737 ATL
Posts: 3,506
Default

Turning your seniority over to a 3rd party is a scary prospect.
Fear of what an arbitrator might do is a powerful motive to compromise.

I expect SWAPA will modify their position in the negotiations prior to arbitration.

Last edited by Check Essential; 08-20-2011 at 05:36 AM.
Check Essential is offline  
Old 08-20-2011, 05:44 AM
  #152  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,480
Default

Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
SWAPA voted 19-0 to send it out to a vote. Our MEC voted 7-1 to not even bother to send it out to a vote. For all of you looking at this from the outside of these pilot groups, what does that tell you about just how "fair and equitable" this SLI agreement was?
It speaks volumes.

Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
You have no idea of their arrogance. Now I'm not schittin' you, but there are pilots over there that firmly believe that we should all be getting preferential interview. That's the damned mentality that we're dealing with. "Reasonable" is not a part of thier vocabulary.
I'm aware. I have been hearing them pontificate at the layover bars for months. The only thing they're not doing is comparing the size of their big watches.

Originally Posted by sailingfun
That is exactly how the list was merged at Air California when they were purchased by American. Half the list was DOH and half was a ratio. So it can had has been done.
And it should be in this case. Its the only truely fair way. Incidently, its the same method I would have recommended had AS merged with AAI.

Originally Posted by Delta1067
The arrogance and entitlements coming out of the swa pilots really is pathetic. This guy was a new hire on the bottom of the list and he truly believed that every single Air Tran pilot should be stapled. His entire selling point was how much better the culture at swa will be for the Air Tran pilot. Somebody who clearly didn't get it.
He gets it. He gets that he wants to steal their upgrades and hurdle over 650 (or 1500) pilots who are equally skilled and have paid MORE professional dues than he has.

They really are amazingly arrogant as a group.
Fishfreighter is offline  
Old 08-20-2011, 06:05 AM
  #153  
Line Holder
 
ironspud's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 747 Cap
Posts: 96
Default

Originally Posted by OrionTanker
What is disappointing for the AirTran pilots, is they were not allowed to vote. Just the MEC guys. How would the vote go if the whole pilot group voted ??? Obviuosly, we will never know. But it probably would have the same ratio as the Southwest guys. For the most part, pilots want the best for everyone including themselves. It takes the 5% to ruin it for everyone else.
Exactly. AirTran pilots should have been allowed to vote just like the SWA pilots were allowed to vote. It's so "not fair".
ironspud is offline  
Old 08-20-2011, 08:16 AM
  #154  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PCL_128's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Recovering Airline Pilot
Posts: 460
Default

Originally Posted by ironspud
Exactly. AirTran pilots should have been allowed to vote just like the SWA pilots were allowed to vote. It's so "not fair".
Been allowed? You act as though the vote was taken from us against our will. In fact, the pilot group demanded that the MEC kill it without sending it out for a vote, because we didn't want the time wasted on something that was clearly unacceptable. We're glad that the union can focus on getting a real deal for these next two months instead of wasting time on a vote doomed for failure.
PCL_128 is offline  
Old 08-20-2011, 08:17 AM
  #155  
Gets Weekends Off
 
C17MooseDriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: In the bunk
Posts: 394
Default

I promise you that the same guys who say on this forum that advocate DOH or relative seniority if it were their company acquiring another company would be barking a different tune if they're butts were on the line.

Check out what the frontier guys were saying about how unfair SWAPAs proposal was for them, then tried to turn it around and use it on their Republic counterparts.

This thread has gone from SLI discussions to bashing the SWA pilot group like every other SWA threads.
C17MooseDriver is offline  
Old 08-20-2011, 09:06 AM
  #156  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by C17MooseDriver
I promise you that the same guys who say on this forum that advocate DOH or relative seniority if it were their company acquiring another company would be barking a different tune if they're butts were on the line.

Check out what the frontier guys were saying about how unfair SWAPAs proposal was for them, then tried to turn it around and use it on their Republic counterparts.

This thread has gone from SLI discussions to bashing the SWA pilot group like every other SWA threads.
I was part of the DAL/NWA merger, & relative seniority was used. It is the most fair method out there. The results aren't favorable for everyone, but you will remain the same % of seniority. When 2 pilot groups merge, you will end up junior to some from the opposite side & senior to some from the opposite side. It's often a bitter pill to swallow, but it's a merger. Expect nothing less.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 08-20-2011, 09:06 AM
  #157  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,221
Default

Originally Posted by Delta1067
The arrogance and entitlements coming out of the swa pilots really is pathetic. Had one in the jumpseat the other day and the Captain and I got a pretty good laugh out of it. This guy was a new hire on the bottom of the list and he truly believed that every single Air Tran pilot should be stapled. His entire selling point was how much better the culture at swa will be for the Air Tran pilot. Somebody who clearly didn't get it.
Was it on an ATL-BWI or BWI-ATL flight by chance?
coryk is offline  
Old 08-20-2011, 10:13 AM
  #158  
Gets Weekends Off
 
1Seat 1Engine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 737 Right
Posts: 1,385
Default

Originally Posted by BlaineFaban
Respect is earned , not given. Your boy started it with his triteness, but I notice you fail to lecture him. Whatever.
Blaine, you're a SWA hater and a Mil hater from way back.

Someone asked a question, I answered it. You decided to attack me for answering a question.

A quick search of your old posts shows you really didn't read anything I said, you just attacked a SWA/MIL guy and now you feel good about it.
1Seat 1Engine is offline  
Old 08-20-2011, 10:17 AM
  #159  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,599
Default

I think this thread is much ado about nothing. There is a transition agreement in place between SWA, SWAPA and the Airtran MEC. It details exactly how this will be handled. I believe it requires arbitration if no agreement is reached by 30 Sep. Sounds like that will be the result. There will not be any selloff ect.. of Airtran assets.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 08-20-2011, 10:17 AM
  #160  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 99
Default

Originally Posted by coryk
Was it on an ATL-BWI or BWI-ATL flight by chance?
I don't think it would be ATL-BWI-ATl .. SWA does not fly that route YET !

I keep seeing you guys refer to this as a merger well it is not a merger. SWA bought AT lock stock and barrel. SWA owns a subsidary called GHC ( from the room at the hotel where the first meetings were held). Air Tran had been put in that holding company, the 140 ac have already been signed over to SWA as a transfer of assets. Those 140 AC will be changed to SWA livery in early 2012. Wether there are FL pilots flying those birds at that time depends on what happens with the SLI.
GizmoNC is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bill Lumberg
Major
79
03-06-2011 07:31 AM
StormChaser
Major
378
08-10-2009 12:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
01-07-2006 03:24 PM
Freighter Captain
Atlas/Polar
0
09-24-2005 08:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices