SWA-Airtran merger good for RAH - frontier
05-09-2011, 06:31 AM
#31
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 190
SWA has never furloughed a single pilot in over thirty years. I guess everyone should just be happy with the career ending SLI results. It probably makes no difference if RAH is CH 7 in the next few years.
05-09-2011, 06:49 AM
#32
Looking for a laugh
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,099
05-09-2011, 07:26 AM
#33
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2008
Position: Uncoveraged...
Posts: 277
In a recent DAL base meeting, somebody asked the network guy about SWA comming to ATL. I knew they weren't afraid of SWA anymore, but I was a bit shocked at how big his smile became when he answered: "We lOVE the fact that SWA is comming to ATL."
Most of the key points have been mentioned. SWA has higher costs than does Airtran (higher unit costs, not just labor,) and must cover the costs by raising yields. SWA typically operates a more even flow out of cities as opposed to Airtran's banked structure in ATL (which happens to be parked right on top of DAL's banks,) so they believe there will be some effeciency gains there. The SWA product doesn't have bussiness/first class, so DAL might get some (higher yielding) traffic from that. And as others have mentioned, the inudstry as a whole is healthier with fewer competitors.
I think he summed it up well in saying. "the industry is only as smart as its dumbest competitor. Southwest is not dumb." Like others have said, they don't Flood in capacity for the sake of market share and at the expense of profits.
Most of the key points have been mentioned. SWA has higher costs than does Airtran (higher unit costs, not just labor,) and must cover the costs by raising yields. SWA typically operates a more even flow out of cities as opposed to Airtran's banked structure in ATL (which happens to be parked right on top of DAL's banks,) so they believe there will be some effeciency gains there. The SWA product doesn't have bussiness/first class, so DAL might get some (higher yielding) traffic from that. And as others have mentioned, the inudstry as a whole is healthier with fewer competitors.
I think he summed it up well in saying. "the industry is only as smart as its dumbest competitor. Southwest is not dumb." Like others have said, they don't Flood in capacity for the sake of market share and at the expense of profits.
05-09-2011, 09:37 AM
#34
On Reserve
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: MSP7ERB
Posts: 1,886
In a recent DAL base meeting, somebody asked the network guy about SWA comming to ATL. I knew they weren't afraid of SWA anymore, but I was a bit shocked at how big his smile became when he answered: "We lOVE the fact that SWA is comming to ATL."
Most of the key points have been mentioned. SWA has higher costs than does Airtran (higher unit costs, not just labor,) and must cover the costs by raising yields. SWA typically operates a more even flow out of cities as opposed to Airtran's banked structure in ATL (which happens to be parked right on top of DAL's banks,) so they believe there will be some effeciency gains there. The SWA product doesn't have bussiness/first class, so DAL might get some (higher yielding) traffic from that. And as others have mentioned, the inudstry as a whole is healthier with fewer competitors.
I think he summed it up well in saying. "the industry is only as smart as its dumbest competitor. Southwest is not dumb." Like others have said, they don't Flood in capacity for the sake of market share and at the expense of profits.
Most of the key points have been mentioned. SWA has higher costs than does Airtran (higher unit costs, not just labor,) and must cover the costs by raising yields. SWA typically operates a more even flow out of cities as opposed to Airtran's banked structure in ATL (which happens to be parked right on top of DAL's banks,) so they believe there will be some effeciency gains there. The SWA product doesn't have bussiness/first class, so DAL might get some (higher yielding) traffic from that. And as others have mentioned, the inudstry as a whole is healthier with fewer competitors.
I think he summed it up well in saying. "the industry is only as smart as its dumbest competitor. Southwest is not dumb." Like others have said, they don't Flood in capacity for the sake of market share and at the expense of profits.
Two Airline Upgrades, Oil Price Drop Signal Some Hope for the Sector - Stocks To Watch Today - Barrons.com
05-09-2011, 09:41 AM
#35
On Reserve
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: MSP7ERB
Posts: 1,886
Jedi Master Yoda says about Delta, "When 87 years YOU have, look as good as I YOU will not!"
05-09-2011, 11:20 AM
#36
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
05-09-2011, 12:46 PM
#37
gets time off
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,250
I think he is talking about ATA. I believe we still have flights in and out of SLC. They are almost always full. The ones I fly their anyway. The only thing I care about is what I get on the 5th and 20th of every month. I dont care where I go or what I do it in as long as that check clears.
05-09-2011, 02:40 PM
#38
No longer cares
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Yup... it has never happened.. and never will. Talk to JP McLaughlin about that kind of quote, and you will realize how arrogant and short sighted it truly is. (He was the first guy furloughed at DAL in the 90s)
05-09-2011, 02:46 PM
#39
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
I think he is talking about ATA. I believe we still have flights in and out of SLC. They are almost always full. The ones I fly their anyway. The only thing I care about is what I get on the 5th and 20th of every month. I dont care where I go or what I do it in as long as that check clears.
I do agree on the paycheck thing, but my dates are the 31st & 15th.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Breton
Hangar Talk
0
06-24-2005 03:57 PM
