Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
Southwest/AirTran deal easy landing >

Southwest/AirTran deal easy landing

Search

Notices

Southwest/AirTran deal easy landing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-04-2011, 06:39 PM
  #141  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MatthewAMEL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 752
Default

Not gonna happen in a post McCaskill-Bond world.

Saying otherwise is Troll (Internet) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
MatthewAMEL is offline  
Old 06-04-2011, 07:04 PM
  #142  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by MatthewAMEL
Not gonna happen in a post McCaskill-Bond world.

Saying otherwise is Troll (Internet) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Uh, calling someone a troll because they repeated what I too have heard (from great sources on the SWA side) is absolutely unnecessary.

Last edited by forgot to bid; 06-04-2011 at 08:31 PM.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 06-04-2011, 07:20 PM
  #143  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: CA
Posts: 1,207
Default

Originally Posted by AirTran
GK has already informed SWAPA that the CBA does not prohibit codeshare with a wholy owned, it only prohibits codeshare with an outside airline. The codeshare begins in September.

The process agreement compells GK to file for single carrier status and combine under a SOC. There can be no liquidation of Guadaloupe prior to that. This agreement was signed by all four parties.

So there is no "leverage" on either side to accept a one-sided ISL. It will be arbitrated and we will all learn to live with it while the company doubles in size over the next 10 years.
Have you actually read this document (Side Letter 8-Transition Agreement)? Here are some pertinent excerpts:

Following the Merger Closing, Southwest and AirTran Airways would each
continue to operate as separate air carriers unless and until Southwest combines Southwest and AirTran Airways into a single air carrier.

As a consequence of Southwest’s acquisition of the stock of AirTran Holdings, Inc., Southwest and SWAPA wish to establish a mechanism for operating Southwest and AirTran as separate carriers until and unless Southwest combines AirTran and Southwest into a single carrier.

Coverage Date or Dates. The date or dates when the terms and conditions of employment of AirTran Pilots will be governed by the SWAPA CBA....The Coverage Date or Dates shall not be prior to Complete Operational Merger, or as otherwise agreed upon by Southwest and the SWAPA BOD or its designee.
shoelu is offline  
Old 06-04-2011, 08:37 PM
  #144  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MatthewAMEL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 752
Default

FTB,

It is trolling. Along the same lines if I posted that I heard just the other day from some Pinnacle guys that Delta is giving them all the domestic flying and just keeping the International routes.

We all know that's BS, you know it's BS because you know there are signed documents (CBA, LOAs), that would prevent such an action.

Similar situation here. Besides the federal law, there is a 4-party Process Agreement that states the lists will be integrated. There is a signed letter from Gary Kelly stating McCaskill-Bond will be complied with.
MatthewAMEL is offline  
Old 06-04-2011, 09:00 PM
  #145  
On Reserve
 
Elvis90's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: MSP7ERB
Posts: 1,886
Default

Originally Posted by MatthewAMEL
FTB,

It is trolling. Along the same lines if I posted that I heard just the other day from some Pinnacle guys that Delta is giving them all the domestic flying and just keeping the International routes.

We all know that's BS, you know it's BS because you know there are signed documents (CBA, LOAs), that would prevent such an action.

Similar situation here. Besides the federal law, there is a 4-party Process Agreement that states the lists will be integrated. There is a signed letter from Gary Kelly stating McCaskill-Bond will be complied with.
Wow, must have struck a nerve. I'd never heard of the term "trolling" before until you mentioned it. The Delta captain I flew with last week heard it from an AirTran captain in his jumpseat. If it is not true that's good news...if it were true my response would be that it's absolutely, morally wrong. That's all I have to say.
Elvis90 is offline  
Old 06-04-2011, 09:40 PM
  #146  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MatthewAMEL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 752
Default

Of course it strikes a nerve. But, hopefully, one of the constructive results of this board, and others like it, is to dispel the really ridiculous rumors that float around out there.

I don't doubt there are AirTran guys out there saying stuff like this. I'm sure there are SWA guys saying the same thing. But you have to consider the source. AT has lots of ex-TWA guys who have been burned by the merger process. We also have a lot of ex-ATA guys who don't have happy memories of their last experience with SWA.
MatthewAMEL is offline  
Old 06-05-2011, 04:26 AM
  #147  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Elvis90
Perhaps I'm naive and have a hard time believing this, but...I heard a rumor this week that SWA intended to keep the companies separate, sell the B717's, and get rid of Airtran crews as aircraft are divested, while simultaneously hiring on the SWA side. Any comments? Confirm or deny? It might be that data concerning this rumor was posted earlier and I simply missed it.
Originally Posted by MatthewAMEL
FTB,

It is trolling. Along the same lines if I posted that I heard just the other day from some Pinnacle guys that Delta is giving them all the domestic flying and just keeping the International routes.

We all know that's BS, you know it's BS because you know there are signed documents (CBA, LOAs), that would prevent such an action.

Similar situation here. Besides the federal law, there is a 4-party Process Agreement that states the lists will be integrated. There is a signed letter from Gary Kelly stating McCaskill-Bond will be complied with.
Is GK bound to comply with it since McCaskill-Bond is law? At least when it comes to SLI?

I promise you Elvis isn't trolling, that stuff is out there and some of it is very well thought out and as far as I can tell, McCaskill-Bond wouldn't stop it. Maybe it would but maybe it wouldn't. Shutting off the debate prematurely would be like us shutting down a Skywest to buy Delta conversation - those things are fun to beat down but informative.

The 717s being sold is something that has hit news sites and is talked about A LOT at SWA. And DAL's headquarters. But it won't happen... in 2011. 2011 ends in a 6 months. That's the word I've heard.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 06-05-2011, 05:06 AM
  #148  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MatthewAMEL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 752
Default

FTB,

I hear what you are saying. 'trolling' may of been a bit harsh.

I'll answer the question another way. Every indication is SWA understands the 717 has been a big piece of AT's competitive advantage against Delta. I still believe that GK is a competent executive. Selling the 717's to DL smacks of that special kind of airline management madness that SWA has never demonstrated.
MatthewAMEL is offline  
Old 06-05-2011, 06:50 AM
  #149  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,803
Default

If SWA tried to sell the 717s and get rid of the proportionate number of AT pilots (which is absurd, but let's just say), they'd better keep it on the down low as long as possible and do it in one shot. I think the "culture" would suffer just a little bit if you know what I'm sayin'.
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Old 06-05-2011, 07:16 AM
  #150  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Is GK bound to comply with it since McCaskill-Bond is law? At least when it comes to SLI?

I promise you Elvis isn't trolling, that stuff is out there and some of it is very well thought out and as far as I can tell, McCaskill-Bond wouldn't stop it. Maybe it would but maybe it wouldn't. Shutting off the debate prematurely would be like us shutting down a Skywest to buy Delta conversation - those things are fun to beat down but informative.

The 717s being sold is something that has hit news sites and is talked about A LOT at SWA. And DAL's headquarters. But it won't happen... in 2011. 2011 ends in a 6 months. That's the word I've heard.
2011 ends in 6 months??? Where do you get such news? You must have a mole somewhere.
tsquare is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
IFLY22
Aviation Law
10
10-26-2011 01:43 PM
Mattio
Aviation Law
3
11-08-2010 08:37 PM
FlyerJosh
Major
14
04-15-2006 05:36 PM
Gordon C
JetBlue
5
10-06-2005 03:28 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices