Search

Notices

Enough is Enough Update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-14-2024, 03:31 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,776
Default

Originally Posted by PNWFlyer
Spirit has entered the chat.
Are you trying to compare us to Spirit? 🤣
RJSAviator76 is offline  
Old 08-14-2024, 05:43 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,029
Default

Originally Posted by Lewbronski
You're an example of exactly what I'm talking about. Classic.

Because neither you nor SWAPA understand the RLA, we made massive strategic mistakes that put us in the position we ended up in.

Tell me: how long did SWAPA wait to file for mediation after opening negotiations? Currently, what is the average time in mediation of cases before the NMB and what does that have to do with anything? How did the amount of time SWAPA waited to file for mediation impact our leverage this past cycle?

That one enormous mistake alone was likely irrecoverable. And it's because SWAPA and this pilot group do not, and have never, understood the RLA.
Given that we didn't do what you suggest here (which I agree with), do you seriously think that continuing to hold out for more, given everything that has happened since we signed, would have been beneficial? I don't think it would have. I think if we had played things differently from the beginning we might have found ourselves in a different position (such as you describe), but I do think we got the most we could have given when we filed for mediation. We'd likely still be in negotiations or have TA2 that is a rearrangement of the deck chairs from TA1 like the FAs got.
4V14T0R is offline  
Old 08-14-2024, 07:52 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 737CA
Posts: 196
Default

lack of understanding of the RLA.​​​​​​
As some others have said, time to move on. I can remember when some airlines had parity plus one(under the RLA), guaranteed pensions(under the RLA), no furloughs(under the RLA). Contract's can only be administered when the companies finances are as such to make it happen. Companies will ALWAYS try to manipulate it to their advantage. Even with "iron clad language". It's a simple as that. Time and time again that has been proven. Their is a big genenration of pilots that were in diapers or not even born when contracts were gutted. Wiped out. ALL negotiated under the RLA. Iron clad language to boot. SWAPA's contract is not perfect. But if you think its sub par, that's your opinion. Most though, saw enough improvements to vote yes.

Last edited by REF 5; 08-14-2024 at 08:13 AM. Reason: spelling
REF 5 is online now  
Old 08-14-2024, 02:28 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,668
Default

Originally Posted by REF 5
As some others have said, time to move on. I can remember when some airlines had parity plus one(under the RLA), guaranteed pensions(under the RLA), no furloughs(under the RLA). Contract's can only be administered when the companies finances are as such to make it happen. Companies will ALWAYS try to manipulate it to their advantage. Even with "iron clad language". It's a simple as that. Time and time again that has been proven. Their is a big genenration of pilots that were in diapers or not even born when contracts were gutted. Wiped out. ALL negotiated under the RLA. Iron clad language to boot. SWAPA's contract is not perfect. But if you think its sub par, that's your opinion. Most though, saw enough improvements to vote yes.
Agree with this. I am a pragmatist and this contract wasn't perfect, but was good. I am proud of how far we have come. Now if we could just get SWAPA to be a little more militant in defending it.
e6bpilot is offline  
Old 08-14-2024, 02:40 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,143
Default

Originally Posted by RJSAviator76
Are you trying to compare us to Spirit? 🤣
well, single fleet type, questionable paint choices, no galley……
PNWFlyer is offline  
Old 08-14-2024, 03:28 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 204
Default

Originally Posted by Lewbronski
The sick leave issue for pilots out for an extended period, among many other issues, could have been solved by applying leverage to our contract negotiations. However, again this cycle, we failed to secure solid, specific contract language to address the predicament we now find ourselves in. If you believe SWAPA and 93% of the pilot group, it was at least partly attributable to the belief that we did not have enough leverage to achieve a truly industry-leading contract. That thought was undergirded by an almost complete, and I would say negligent, lack of understanding of the RLA. That, in turn, resulted in a nearly complete failure to leverage the best negotiating environment for pilots since the 1960's or earlier.



As it stands now, the company is not even taking advantage of a loop hole in our sick leave use policy. They are simply applying the policy, as written in the contract, handed to them by 93% of the pilot group who voted "YES!!!"



It's not like management just started acting this way recently. But like an infant playing peek-a-boo, SWAPA and the pilot group seem surprised every time the company pops its head back up doing the same old sort of thing again.

It has been going on at least as long as I have been here - for about two decades. It's pretty comical. We seem to have had the learning lobe of our brains lobotomized when they offered us the kool-aid and Nikes at new hire training.

But it's not funny for the pilots who will be effected by the sick leave use language we agreed to. Now pilots out on an extended sick leave will be sacrificing some or a lot of their vacation accrual, costing them future income and saving the company cash.

And I know we all can't wait to start riding those middle seats on nearly every DH when we go to assigned seating. But that probably won't be all that hilarious either after the fifth or sixth time.

Oh well, there's always 2032.
We have past practice on our side and we will win in arbitration regardless of contract language.

Contract is not perfect. In your scenario, we'd probably still be negotiating today. I'm glad we locked in the gains we have given the FAA, Elliot, and Boeing headwinds we are facing.

Last edited by KPer; 08-14-2024 at 03:40 PM.
KPer is offline  
Old 08-14-2024, 03:40 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 204
Default

Originally Posted by Lewbronski
You're an example of exactly what I'm talking about. Classic.

Because neither you nor SWAPA understand the RLA, we made massive strategic mistakes that put us in the position we ended up in.

Tell me: how long did SWAPA wait to file for mediation after opening negotiations? Currently, what is the average time in mediation of cases before the NMB and what does that have to do with anything? How did the amount of time SWAPA waited to file for mediation impact our leverage this past cycle?

That one enormous mistake alone was likely irrecoverable. And it's because SWAPA and this pilot group do not, and have never, understood the RLA.
I agree about filing for mediation earlier, but that's irrelevant now. Would you rather have the contract we have now, or still be in negotiations in this environment? Come on, be honest.
KPer is offline  
Old 08-14-2024, 03:57 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 204
Default

Originally Posted by 123AB
Thanks for the pick-me-up from everyone above. I guess I let myself get worn down from some back to back trips and a few CAs constantly bantering about furloughs. Just wrapped up a trip tonight and have the next 6 days off. Going to get away for a bit and rejuvenate and get my positive attitude back on track.
The CAs you've been flying with are a$$clowns. We are not perfect here, but you'll be fine. They are just bitter about the choices they have made while they collect $400K/year. Many of them could barely make minimum wage outside of a cockpit.
KPer is offline  
Old 08-14-2024, 04:18 PM
  #39  
weekends off? Nope...
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 2,021
Default

Originally Posted by KPer
The CAs you've been flying with are a$$clowns. We are not perfect here, but you'll be fine. They are just bitter about the choices they have made while they collect $400K/year. Many of them could barely make minimum wage outside of a cockpit.
Seriously. Remind those guys the bottom of the list is pure D225...think the company is going to undermine its own pipeline to save a few bucks for a few months? Just tell the next guy "Yeah that makes sense, as long as you don't think about it"
Smooth at FL450 is offline  
Old 08-14-2024, 05:43 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,668
Default

I am just amazed at how tone deaf some of our captains are when dealing with new FOs. Maybe it's because I am not that removed from it and I had some pretty bad experiences early on (cough cough PHX and HOU weekend reserve cough cough), but I would never in a million 3 day trips mention the F word to a new hire unless they brought it up first and then only to tell them how unlikely it is. I get it, the lost decade was rough and, mostly by a stroke of pure luck, we have some senior captains who didn't have to suffer too much and therefore are completely ignorant about the industry. Come on, though. It only takes a millisecond for the brain mouth filter to work properly. Use it.

I am guessing the same heroes quit buying at the bar because "it's a FO contract".
e6bpilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EWRflyr
United
9
01-28-2012 11:34 AM
jetguy
Hangar Talk
3
09-23-2010 10:56 AM
CA Jimenez
United
8
09-06-2010 05:42 AM
Voski
Pilot Health
2
12-08-2009 02:24 PM
chrtrplt
Cargo
16
09-24-2006 12:17 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices