Search

Notices

Why not Embraer?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-31-2024, 05:56 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Posts: 105
Default

DEN-HI via ABQ, ELP with a crew change in LGB.
TexasFlight is offline  
Old 07-31-2024, 09:07 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2023
Posts: 127
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
United lurker… how is SWA planning on doing DEN-HI without augmenting? I’ve flown it multiple times on the 757 and the slowest flight plan I ever had was .83 to stay under the flight time limit.

bruh- Max 7 cert is taking so long because it is getting 777x wingtips so it can go up to FL600 and cruise at .96. Class 9 rest facility with massaging chairs and spa facility

The anti-ice certification problem is because it’s sooooo much colder up there you can leave it on without melting the engines
FyrePilot is online now  
Old 07-31-2024, 02:29 PM
  #33  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 84
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
United lurker… how is SWA planning on doing DEN-HI without augmenting? I’ve flown it multiple times on the 757 and the slowest flight plan I ever had was .83 to stay under the flight time limit.
Didn't CO used to use a row of coach for the 'rest' seat pre merger for the 75 flying to Europe? I wonder if SWA is trying something similar. What does the SWA contact say about rest seats and augmenting? I wonder if today's FAA would sign off on something like that, too.
tmtbiker is offline  
Old 07-31-2024, 03:21 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,803
Default

Originally Posted by tmtbiker
Didn't CO used to use a row of coach for the 'rest' seat pre merger for the 75 flying to Europe? I wonder if SWA is trying something similar. What does the SWA contact say about rest seats and augmenting? I wonder if today's FAA would sign off on something like that, too.
I’m feeling fatigued just reading this.
WHACKMASTER is online now  
Old 07-31-2024, 06:36 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 3,776
Default

Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
I’m feeling fatigued just reading this.
Ditto. Count me out.
Cyio is offline  
Old 07-31-2024, 07:16 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CA1900's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 843
Default

Originally Posted by tmtbiker
Didn't CO used to use a row of coach for the 'rest' seat pre merger for the 75 flying to Europe? I wonder if SWA is trying something similar.
If I'm reading the rules correctly, I don't think that would be compliant with Part 117. 117.3 defines three types of rest facility:

Rest facility means a bunk or seat accommodation installed in an aircraft that provides a flightcrew member with a sleep opportunity.

(1) Class 1 rest facility means a bunk or other surface that allows for a flat sleeping position and is located separate from both the flight deck and passenger cabin in an area that is temperature-controlled, allows the flightcrew member to control light, and provides isolation from noise and disturbance.

(2) Class 2 rest facility means a seat in an aircraft cabin that allows for a flat or near flat sleeping position; is separated from passengers by a minimum of a curtain to provide darkness and some sound mitigation; and is reasonably free from disturbance by passengers or flightcrew members.

(3) Class 3 rest facility means a seat in an aircraft cabin or flight deck that reclines at least 40 degrees and provides leg and foot support.
Even the upcoming extended-legroom section isn't going to meet the definition of even a Class 3 unless we have a special row of extra-recline seats with footrests on each airplane, which seems unlikely. Unless they want to lay a camping roll across a row of seats and don't mind my feet hanging in the aisle.
CA1900 is offline  
Old 07-31-2024, 07:23 PM
  #37  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 84
Default

Originally Posted by CA1900
If I'm reading the rules correctly, I don't think that would be compliant with Part 117. 117.3 defines three types of rest facility:



Even the upcoming extended-legroom section isn't going to meet the definition of even a Class 3 unless we have a special row of extra-recline seats with footrests on each airplane, which seems unlikely. Unless they want to lay a camping roll across a row of seats and don't mind my feet hanging in the aisle.
All good points. Obviously CO book was well prior to 117.

Also curious how SWA would get an airplane that heavy out of DEN, especially in the summer. My MAXs going on 3-4hr hops are barely squeaking by with bleeds off at midnight, when the temps are relatively low. We're fighting brake energy limits every night. Daytime departures are stopping for gas in CLE on the way to the east coast....
tmtbiker is offline  
Old 07-31-2024, 08:06 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,668
Default

Originally Posted by tmtbiker
All good points. Obviously CO book was well prior to 117.

Also curious how SWA would get an airplane that heavy out of DEN, especially in the summer. My MAXs going on 3-4hr hops are barely squeaking by with bleeds off at midnight, when the temps are relatively low. We're fighting brake energy limits every night. Daytime departures are stopping for gas in CLE on the way to the east coast....
You would be amazed what you can do with a 16k foot runway.
e6bpilot is offline  
Old 07-31-2024, 08:49 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,920
Default

Originally Posted by tmtbiker
All good points. Obviously CO book was well prior to 117.

Also curious how SWA would get an airplane that heavy out of DEN, especially in the summer. My MAXs going on 3-4hr hops are barely squeaking by with bleeds off at midnight, when the temps are relatively low. We're fighting brake energy limits every night. Daytime departures are stopping for gas in CLE on the way to the east coast....
Been bases in DEN for 8.5 years and had to do my first bleeds off in a stuffed MAX this week…mid-day, 95° and 4 hr leg. Still had plenty of room on performance data. You can do a lot with 3 miles of pavement.
flyguy81 is offline  
Old 08-01-2024, 09:29 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Position: N/A
Posts: 607
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
United lurker… how is SWA planning on doing DEN-HI without augmenting? I’ve flown it multiple times on the 757 and the slowest flight plan I ever had was .83 to stay under the flight time limit.
I’m guessing SWA doesn’t have a contractual 8 hour limit without augmentation like United does. So they can use the entire 9 hours allowed under 117? Coming back to DEN is shorter so they can do that in under 8 on a redeye? Just a guess.
Duckdude is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trent890
Envoy Airlines
4
05-06-2023 06:57 PM
Excargodog
Regional
25
07-25-2018 07:02 AM
bimjim
Foreign
3
03-06-2012 04:12 AM
bimjim
Hiring News
3
03-04-2012 01:34 PM
Lennon
JetBlue
0
07-01-2005 07:27 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices