Search

Notices

Another incident ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-02-2024, 11:11 AM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 988
Default

Originally Posted by e6bpilot
Love that this thread has gone to complete wild guesses and good old SWA bashing by pilots from airlines that have all committed much worse sins in their cockpits. I know this isn't en vogue, but if we wait we may get a written report with facts and recommendations in it that will help everybody.
I remember my first time on the internet.
Zard is offline  
Old 07-02-2024, 11:11 AM
  #62  
At your mom's house
 
hoover's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: cpt 737
Posts: 2,797
Default

Originally Posted by e6bpilot
Love that this thread has gone to complete wild guesses and good old SWA bashing by pilots from airlines that have all committed much worse sins in their cockpits. I know this isn't en vogue, but if we wait we may get a written report with facts and recommendations in it that will help everybody.
I agree but I doubt we'll get anything from the company. It's pretty quiet from them when someone messes up. I'd argue the company could be seen as negligent for not addressing these incidents promptly with the crews.
hoover is offline  
Old 07-02-2024, 11:32 AM
  #63  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2022
Posts: 68
Default

Originally Posted by e6bpilot
Love that this thread has gone to complete wild guesses and good old SWA bashing by pilots from airlines that have all committed much worse sins in their cockpits. I know this isn't en vogue, but if we wait we may get a written report with facts and recommendations in it that will help everybody.
Southwest pilots might get a bit more sympathy if they didn’t help perpetuate the myth about their persona. When ATC asks you a question about a potential pilot deviation they already know the answer. Can I get a “direct somewhere “ amen?
Midsomer is offline  
Old 07-02-2024, 11:36 AM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 1,159
Default

Originally Posted by e6bpilot
Love that this thread has gone to complete wild guesses and good old SWA bashing by pilots from airlines that have all committed much worse sins in their cockpits. I know this isn't en vogue, but if we wait we may get a written report with facts and recommendations in it that will help everybody.
Don’t disagree completely, but if you listen to the ATC audio, the CA clearly states he believed he took AFTER the closure period. He did not, however get clearance to actually take off. Not sure where the speculation is there.
waldo135 is offline  
Old 07-02-2024, 11:47 AM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2StgTurbine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,339
Default

Originally Posted by waldo135
Don’t disagree completely, but if you listen to the ATC audio, the CA clearly states he believed he took AFTER the closure period.
I'm curious about the timeline of these radio calls. I find it hard to believe that they knew about the NOTAM yet failed to actually check their clocks before takeoff. I wonder if they saw the vehicles on the runway and that clued them into the mistake. Maybe by the time center questioned them they had a chance to look at the NOTAMs and come up with a quick defense.
2StgTurbine is offline  
Old 07-02-2024, 11:50 AM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 1,159
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
I'm curious about the timeline of these radio calls. I find it hard to believe that they knew about the NOTAM yet failed to actually check their clocks before takeoff. I wonder if they saw the vehicles on the runway and that clued them into the mistake. Maybe by the time center questioned them they had a chance to look at the NOTAMs and come up with a quick defense.
Have you listened to the tape. Don’t remember the exact words, but the CA states they took off after 0545. Since that’s when the tower opened, he admitted he took off without a clearance to do so…or he lied about when he took off.
waldo135 is offline  
Old 07-02-2024, 11:54 AM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2StgTurbine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,339
Default

Originally Posted by waldo135
Have you listened to the tape. Don’t remember the exact words, but the CA states they took off after 0545.
That doesn't make any sense. Brickyard took after them and the tower was still closed. So that means Southwest departed before 0545. Also, the ops vehicle on the runway called tower after the takeoff and tower responded that they were not open yet.
2StgTurbine is offline  
Old 07-02-2024, 12:40 PM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,650
Default

Originally Posted by hoover
I agree but I doubt we'll get anything from the company. It's pretty quiet from them when someone messes up. I'd argue the company could be seen as negligent for not addressing these incidents promptly with the crews.
It's been anything but quiet as of late. They have been pretty forthcoming with details of recent screwups. This is a change from the days past where they went completely dark.
e6bpilot is offline  
Old 07-02-2024, 02:21 PM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DeltaboundRedux's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2020
Position: Enoch Powell Enthusiast
Posts: 2,283
Default

S happens. No one was hurt. Pilots will be spoken to. SWA pilots are the best 737 operators in the business.

When stuff gets real, I’d trust an experienced SWA 737 crew over literally anyone else on the planet.

Anecdotally, I know more than a few ATC personnel. The baseline assumption is no one GAF as long as there isn’t a loss of separation (this is not legal advice).

“Humankind cannot bear too much reality”. Or scrutiny. There is no perfect flight.

Amplifying tiny errors like this on a public forum doesn’t help anyone in our profession.
DeltaboundRedux is offline  
Old 07-02-2024, 03:07 PM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captjns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,995
Default

Good example how the process works from ASAP review through the SMS recomcmendation(s). The ERC makes recommendations for a policy, process and procedure, for example, that dispatch will list applicablet NOTAMs on the signature page of the paperwork. A result of the SMS report would direct the Training Department to design a course segment, during initial and recurrent, which emphasizes procedures operating to and from non-towered airports.

The old saying goes.... procedures and regulations are written in blood.
captjns is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Propwash72
Career Questions
4
10-06-2019 03:42 AM
pem0055
Career Questions
6
03-14-2017 08:32 PM
uboatdriver
Career Questions
3
07-03-2013 03:41 PM
Flameout
Major
64
09-17-2008 02:40 PM
2cylinderdriver
Regional
28
09-17-2006 04:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices