Search

Notices

Another incident ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-02-2024, 06:52 AM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
madmax757's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: seated - facing forward
Posts: 1,068
Default

Originally Posted by joepilot50
You're not going to get an argument from me about it.

Your radio works? Make the darn calls.

If this crew made the conscious decision to not make radio calls over CTAF, then yeah they are in a bag of hurt.

I was simply stating CTAF calls are not required. Boneheaded not to, but not required. And as rick points out, if something happens your decision not to will come under a microscope.

Lets hope this is a case of wrong frequency or some other distraction.

I flew with an FO recently that does a lot of flying in California in his piper. He was about to depart Mammoth 🦣 when an F16 did a low high speed pass with no announcement on CTAF or Unicom as my friend was about to take the runway. A few minutes later the F16 comes in the freq and apologized that he was on incorrect freq.
madmax757 is offline  
Old 07-02-2024, 06:56 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 594
Default

Originally Posted by CX500T
I went through military flight school (Twice, actually) and there is a lot of stuff that might be hammered/taught if doing part 61 PPL/COM at a small uncontrolled field, that they just don't get that much if any exposure to.
Originally Posted by rickair7777
Even if both were pointy nose types, one of them had been in the airlines for ten-ish years or more. Even if not very familiar with uncontrolled fields, he should have known enough to brush up on it first.
This all day long. If it were UA maybe you'd have the perfect storm of two, almost brand new "bubbas"🤮 Even then, highly unlikely. But SW? At least one knew way better. My bet would have to be incorrect freq.
60av8tor is offline  
Old 07-02-2024, 06:56 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,466
Default

Originally Posted by joepilot50
Simply calling out the said statement of, " required CTAF calls"

You don't have to make them, but you certainly will probably have to defend that decision if anything happens.
Re: "you don't have to make them"....what's the Ops Spec say? Ours says you will make the calls. Everyone was trying to contact them on CTAF, tower, the vehicle, and another aircraft.

The FAA can also take a dim view to "you don't have to" and they can come after you under 'careless and reckless' if they choose.
Sliceback is offline  
Old 07-02-2024, 07:29 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2022
Posts: 130
Default

Originally Posted by Sliceback
Re: "you don't have to make them"....what's the Ops Spec say? Ours says you will make the calls. Everyone was trying to contact them on CTAF, tower, the vehicle, and another aircraft.

The FAA can also take a dim view to "you don't have to" and they can come after you under 'careless and reckless' if they choose.
If you followed the comment chain, I was strictly speaking FAR wise.

As I have said multiple times, I am not speaking to SWA procedure because I am not a SWA pilot so I am not speaking in terms of ops specs or what SWA requires because I don't have access to that.

And like that comment you replied to stated already, you're gonna have to defend that decision if anything happens cause yeah the FAA can still come after you for careless and reckless.

joepilot50 is offline  
Old 07-02-2024, 08:17 AM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MatthewAMEL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 751
Default

Originally Posted by Sliceback
Re: "you don't have to make them"....what's the Ops Spec say? Ours says you will make the calls. Everyone was trying to contact them on CTAF, tower, the vehicle, and another aircraft.

The FAA can also take a dim view to "you don't have to" and they can come after you under 'careless and reckless' if they choose.
We are required to make all the expected calls in non-towered/closed towered airports. Inbound, on the ground, and during departure. It's in multiple places in our manuals and those of us that are based out west spend a lot of time making those calls at the smaller airports we service.
MatthewAMEL is offline  
Old 07-02-2024, 08:44 AM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Timmay's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: FOD
Posts: 536
Default

Originally Posted by joepilot50
If you followed the comment chain, I was strictly speaking FAR wise.

As I have said multiple times, I am not speaking to SWA procedure because I am not a SWA pilot so I am not speaking in terms of ops specs or what SWA requires because I don't have access to that.

And like that comment you replied to stated already, you're gonna have to defend that decision if anything happens cause yeah the FAA can still come after you for careless and reckless.
So what was the point of making the comment in the first place, then? It's not regulatory that an aircraft use a landing light for landing at night, only that it has one functioning. Maybe I should go find a post about night landings and drop that little nugget of useless wisdom and help contribute.
Timmay is offline  
Old 07-02-2024, 09:18 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2022
Posts: 130
Default

Originally Posted by Timmay
So what was the point of making the comment in the first place, then? It's not regulatory that an aircraft use a landing light for landing at night, only that it has one functioning. Maybe I should go find a post about night landings and drop that little nugget of useless wisdom and help contribute.
Because someone stated required CTAF calls and they didn't appear to be referencing SWA procedure in stating so. If someone who worked at SWA replied they are required to make calls over CTAF, boom done and this topic would be over.

This topic is literally the perfect example of the game telephone. Context and things get lost as each reply occurs so here we are arriving people thinking I was talking about SWA Ops Specs. When the original comment I made specifically mentioned strictly speaking FAR's and I wasn't speaking for SWA procedures because I don't have their books.
joepilot50 is offline  
Old 07-02-2024, 10:13 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2StgTurbine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,333
Default

In my experience, most people I fly with at uncontrolled fields undervalue CTAF calls. They seem to forget that general aviation could be using a "large" class D/C airport late at night or early in the morning. Plenty think one call 10 miles out or one call before push is all that is needed. At least one captain actually thought we had the right of way because we were on an ILS.
2StgTurbine is offline  
Old 07-02-2024, 10:37 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,648
Default

Love that this thread has gone to complete wild guesses and good old SWA bashing by pilots from airlines that have all committed much worse sins in their cockpits. I know this isn't en vogue, but if we wait we may get a written report with facts and recommendations in it that will help everybody.
e6bpilot is offline  
Old 07-02-2024, 10:47 AM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: Looking left
Posts: 3,378
Default

Originally Posted by joepilot50
You're not going to get an argument from me whether one should make calls over CTAF. You absolutely should if your plane has a radio.

Just separating out the requirement to make calls over CTAF vs the recommendation to do so.

And again since I don't have Southwest's books in front me, I am not going to say whether SWA requires crews to do so. I will let a SWA pilot speak to that.
SWA does require
DWC CAP10 USAF is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Propwash72
Career Questions
4
10-06-2019 03:42 AM
pem0055
Career Questions
6
03-14-2017 08:32 PM
uboatdriver
Career Questions
3
07-03-2013 03:41 PM
Flameout
Major
64
09-17-2008 02:40 PM
2cylinderdriver
Regional
28
09-17-2006 04:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices