Search

Notices

Low flight over OKC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-22-2024, 07:37 AM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,648
Default

Nobody at SWA is winging it. My guess is that two pilots got pulled outside by something that they thought was the runway. OKC is a bit of a dark airport and coming from that direction it isn't the easiest to see, especially RW 13. Clearly something went wrong, they should have never been in that position, but thankfully they were saved by the systems in place to prevent such a disaster. I suspect we will hear more about it in the weeks to come, but I doubt that any of us have the full picture or even half the picture of what actually occurred.
I am not defending what happened. It was clearly not good. I am just saying that this isn't the first time two well meaning conscientious pilots got suckered into making a bad choice late at night on the last leg of a long day. Hopefully it will be the last for a while.
e6bpilot is offline  
Old 06-22-2024, 08:07 AM
  #52  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,016
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley
On the other hand, when tower tells you to maintain 180 until the marker and you fully configure instead, you'll get paid more when they tell you to go around.
Typically the guy behind you will get the go-around.

If you want to make money, fly fast and crawl up the butt of the plane ahead of you. If tower calls the go, you gotta go...
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 06-22-2024, 08:13 AM
  #53  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,016
Default

Originally Posted by e6bpilot
Nobody at SWA is winging it. My guess is that two pilots got pulled outside by something that they thought was the runway. OKC is a bit of a dark airport and coming from that direction it isn't the easiest to see, especially RW 13. Clearly something went wrong, they should have never been in that position, but thankfully they were saved by the systems in place to prevent such a disaster. I suspect we will hear more about it in the weeks to come, but I doubt that any of us have the full picture or even half the picture of what actually occurred.
I am not defending what happened. It was clearly not good. I am just saying that this isn't the first time two well meaning conscientious pilots got suckered into making a bad choice late at night on the last leg of a long day. Hopefully it will be the last for a while.
This would be my assumption too, I'm sure they were flying professionally and the holes just lined up on a late night. The other airport didn't have a SE runway, but it's N/S parallels would look the same as OKC so maybe they had visually locked onto the wrong airport and were distracted by trying to descend toward and visually acquire a SE runway which didn't exist.

It's a thing, the long instrument runways are lit up like christmas trees while the short GA runway has maybe edge lights and a VASI.

From talking to friends, the days of the cowboy at SWA are 99.99% over, probaby no more than any other airline.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 06-22-2024, 09:09 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 326
Default

Originally Posted by Whoopsmybad
“most” ILS approaches are a 5 mile final
Don’t let a period stop you from becoming an expert. Keep reading beyond the first sentence. Especially the last two sentences.


“Do not accept an ATC approach speed assignment in excess of 170 kt closer than 5 miles from the end of the runway. This is to prevent ATC from assigning excessive speed clearances that compromise the stabilized approach. If the speed restriction is given “to the marker,” use 170 kt to the outer marker/FAS. If the speed restriction is given to a mileage fix,
use 170 kt to a 5-mile final.”
Liberty is offline  
Old 06-22-2024, 10:59 AM
  #55  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2020
Posts: 84
Default

My personal checklist.

Don't accept landing clearances on downwind, dog legs, where I may lose the runway or overshoot trying to intercept. Never at night, unless I'm assured of some kind of verified backup, especially airports outside of my base. I always ask for the longest runway available and double check things when using RNAV/GPS for backup. They can turn into distractions if not loaded correctly or the VNAV doesn't like something.

I don't get anxious looking for the airport/runway so that we can be cleared for the approach. I don't care, let the controller do their job and vector me to a safe point where I may better see it.
Rseat is offline  
Old 06-22-2024, 11:10 AM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 326
Default

Originally Posted by Rseat
My personal checklist.

Don't accept landing clearances on downwind, dog legs, where I may lose the runway or overshoot trying to intercept. Never at night, unless I'm assured of some kind of verified backup, especially airports outside of my base. I always ask for the longest runway available and double check things when using RNAV/GPS for backup. They can turn into distractions if not loaded correctly or the VNAV doesn't like something.

I don't get anxious looking for the airport/runway so that we can be cleared for the approach. I don't care, let the controller do their job and vector me to a safe point where I may better see it.
“#### tower, SWA1001, left base for runway 35”

”SWA 1001, #### tower, wind 350/10, runway 35 clear to land “

“#### tower, SWA 1001, I do not accept”

😂😂😂

Liberty is offline  
Old 06-22-2024, 11:14 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MatthewAMEL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 751
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Configured and on speed at the final approach fix? How much fuel is that per year? Why the need as it had nothing to do with this incident. They were 9 miles out! I once flew with a FO going into Dakar. Hired with 2000 hours of RJ time and no PIC. Set up nicely for a visual approach on downwind flaps 5, 180 knots in a 757. At that time the requirement was to intercept final above 500 feet. Tower clears us to land. We fly 3 miles past the airport when I mention it's behind us. Tower comes back up and says Delta, I clear you to land. FO says not comfortable with tight patterns. Passing the outer marker tower says, "Delta where are you going".
We turned base at 8 miles!
Not sure where you fly, but that is actually in our books here at SWA in IMC. I would expect a similar guidence to be released soon regarding approaches in VMC.
MatthewAMEL is offline  
Old 06-22-2024, 11:17 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Posts: 2,373
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Configured and on speed at the final approach fix? How much fuel is that per year? Why the need as it had nothing to do with this incident. They were 9 miles out! I once flew with a FO going into Dakar. Hired with 2000 hours of RJ time and no PIC. Set up nicely for a visual approach on downwind flaps 5, 180 knots in a 757. At that time the requirement was to intercept final above 500 feet. Tower clears us to land. We fly 3 miles past the airport when I mention it's behind us. Tower comes back up and says Delta, I clear you to land. FO says not comfortable with tight patterns. Passing the outer marker tower says, "Delta where are you going".
We turned base at 8 miles!
Sounds like they flew to their comfort level to have a safe and stable approach in an unfamiliar environment. Good aeronautical decision making.
PilotBases is offline  
Old 06-22-2024, 11:20 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 326
Default

Originally Posted by MatthewAMEL
Not sure where you fly, but that is actually in our books here at SWA in IMC. I would expect a similar guidence to be released soon regarding approaches in VMC.
What is in our books for IMC?
Liberty is offline  
Old 06-22-2024, 01:45 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Mozam's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Position: Left
Posts: 1,254
Default

Originally Posted by MatthewAMEL
I would expect a similar guidence to be released soon regarding approaches in VMC.


I doubt it. They are more concerned about Deadheading pilots to sit behind the wing and not up near the front . Do not take up premium seating.
Mozam is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Champeen07
Part 91 and Low Time
1
08-23-2012 10:21 AM
Rotor2prop
Major
13
07-11-2012 10:55 AM
RockBottom
Major
0
07-12-2005 11:15 AM
Freighter Captain
Major
2
06-10-2005 11:32 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices