Search

Notices

Low flight over OKC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-21-2024, 07:38 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 154
Default

I'm thinking 2 engine flameout and they got 'em re-lit. Great airmanship.
Noconcessions is offline  
Old 06-21-2024, 07:50 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 3,227
Default

Originally Posted by Noconcessions
I'm thinking 2 engine flameout and they got 'em re-lit. Great airmanship.

lol I was think more of, the captain woke up from his nap seconds before impacting the ground and with his quick thinking, pull up and saved the day!
Halon1211 is offline  
Old 06-21-2024, 08:12 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 3,227
Default

Originally Posted by SaintNick
What is going on over there? Seems like every week a new safety issue pops up.
https://abc7ny.com/post/faa-investig...homa/14983957/
a flight attendant was in the jumpseat and actually captured a photo during this low altitude alert while the pilots where trying to find the runway.


Halon1211 is offline  
Old 06-22-2024, 12:13 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 986
Default

Originally Posted by Cyio
I have not once seen a pilot here not back it up even when clear and a million.

same. Zero times in 6 years on the line I’ve ever seen someone totally wing it.
Zard is offline  
Old 06-22-2024, 02:52 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 513
Default

Originally Posted by Zard
same. Zero times in 6 years on the line I’ve ever seen someone totally wing it.
if you don't cross check your position with your eye balls that is pretty much the same thing. If you backed up the visual with magenta but never look at the ND it has no value. They almost landed at the wrong airport even though they "didn't wing it".
Nordhavn is offline  
Old 06-22-2024, 03:36 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,588
Default

Originally Posted by MatthewAMEL
One of the 'talked about' procedures that has been promised or theatened for years, depending on your view, is flying to the FAF on ANY approach prior to landing. A/C should be configured and on-speed at FAF. Eliminates pretty much all guesswork, ensures both pilots have the 'shared mental model' and gives you a fixed point in space to aim for in all circumstances. Perhaps this is the incident that pushes that procedure into practice.
Configured and on speed at the final approach fix? How much fuel is that per year? Why the need as it had nothing to do with this incident. They were 9 miles out! I once flew with a FO going into Dakar. Hired with 2000 hours of RJ time and no PIC. Set up nicely for a visual approach on downwind flaps 5, 180 knots in a 757. At that time the requirement was to intercept final above 500 feet. Tower clears us to land. We fly 3 miles past the airport when I mention it's behind us. Tower comes back up and says Delta, I clear you to land. FO says not comfortable with tight patterns. Passing the outer marker tower says, "Delta where are you going".
We turned base at 8 miles!
sailingfun is offline  
Old 06-22-2024, 03:46 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GogglesPisano's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: On the hotel shuttle
Posts: 5,905
Default

Over the FAF at the published altitude pointed at the runway should be industry standard at this point (notwithstanding the fact that ATC sometimes vectors you slghtly inside thinking they are doing you a "favor.")

Landing checklist complete by 1,000.

On speed by 500.

Boring is professional.

Exciting is amateur.
GogglesPisano is offline  
Old 06-22-2024, 04:01 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 326
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley
Flying 180 to the marker, followed by final configuration, slow to target speed, and checklist complete by 1,000 feet is not only a safe and stable approach, it should be effortless by this stage of the game.
Or we could fly it by the book.🤷🏻‍♂️ Doing our own thing with a macho attitude may be contributing to the problem.

“Do not accept an ATC approach speed assignment in excess of 170 kt closer than 5 miles from the end of the runway. This is to prevent ATC from assigning excessive speed clearances that compromise the stabilized approach. If the speed restriction is given “to the marker,” use 170 kt to the outer marker/FAS. If the speed restriction is given to a mileage fix,
use 170 kt to a 5-mile final.”

Last edited by Liberty; 06-22-2024 at 04:29 AM.
Liberty is offline  
Old 06-22-2024, 06:46 AM
  #49  
Can’t find crew pickup
 
Joined APC: Jun 2021
Posts: 2,231
Default

Originally Posted by Liberty
Or we could fly it by the book.🤷🏻‍♂️ Doing our own thing with a macho attitude may be contributing to the problem.

“Do not accept an ATC approach speed assignment in excess of 170 kt closer than 5 miles from the end of the runway. This is to prevent ATC from assigning excessive speed clearances that compromise the stabilized approach. If the speed restriction is given “to the marker,” use 170 kt to the outer marker/FAS. If the speed restriction is given to a mileage fix,
use 170 kt to a 5-mile final.”
“most” ILS approaches are a 5 mile final
Whoopsmybad is offline  
Old 06-22-2024, 07:16 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 326
Default

Originally Posted by whoopsmybad
“most” ils approaches are a 5 mile final

🤦‍♂️


………….
Liberty is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Champeen07
Part 91 and Low Time
1
08-23-2012 10:21 AM
Rotor2prop
Major
13
07-11-2012 10:55 AM
RockBottom
Major
0
07-12-2005 11:15 AM
Freighter Captain
Major
2
06-10-2005 11:32 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices