Low flight over OKC
06-21-2024, 06:02 AM
#12
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,992
Oh well, ASAP should work, and you guys now know what the scenario will be for LOFT next year.
06-21-2024, 06:03 AM
#13
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,992
06-21-2024, 06:12 AM
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 507
If they were trying to line up on OKC RWY 13, it might have been CFIT because there is no RWY 13 at KRCE. Or maybe they were just circling to land at night on one of the south rwys at the municipal field.
Oh well, ASAP should work, and you guys now know what the scenario will be for LOFT next year.
Oh well, ASAP should work, and you guys now know what the scenario will be for LOFT next year.
06-21-2024, 07:42 AM
#16
It's 5 o'clock somewhere
Joined APC: Oct 2020
Posts: 2,131
Looks to me like they lined up with I40 or OK4 thinking it was runway 13 on a visual backed up with the RNAV. Anyone who's spent much time out there knows what I mean. If you're tired and it's late at night it's plausible to make that mistake.
06-21-2024, 08:32 AM
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 507
why even back up the visual approach with the RNAV if you don't look at the ND one solitary time (either pilot)? VTK and lateral deviations would have been full scale deflected. Must have been autopilot off and PM out to lunch window lickin.
06-21-2024, 08:36 AM
#19
It's 5 o'clock somewhere
Joined APC: Oct 2020
Posts: 2,131
06-21-2024, 09:03 AM
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,029
Zero spun in the altitude selector and in VS or LVL CHG? Either way not a good look. Looks like they were set up for 13 then recovered and decided on 17R.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
