Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
Activist Investor pushing changes at SWA >

Activist Investor pushing changes at SWA

Search

Notices

Activist Investor pushing changes at SWA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-14-2024, 09:30 AM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,650
Default

Originally Posted by jumppilot
Honest question.

Why doesn’t Southwest start charging for bags? Or put some upgraded economy rows they can charge for? Can they charge for a seat assignment? Other airlines have made billions on these fees over the last 15 years.

Might be a catch-22 though. The more they start looking like other airlines, the more people will start shopping other airlines.
I think you answered your own question. They were trying to differentiate themselves by democratizing travel and basically charging a little more but giving everybody the same benefits without the bogus nickel and dime charges. I think that worked well until pretty recently. SWA had a nice middle between legacy airlines and ULCCs. Basic economy fares had the double effect of killing ULCC business (also redeploying domestic capacity to leisure markets) and lowering fares so much that SWA couldn't compete on a price basis.
SWA management is stuck in a rut and is super slow to adapt. The pre board and extra seat scams are perfect examples. They hit social media and now are widely used. Instead of crushing it in the crib, SWA doesn't take a position and ends up ****ing off their loyal customers. They should have rolled out a new product 2 years ago but instead have been doing who knows what while taking fat bonuses and hiring more layers of non revenue producing management.
While I think these vultures are not going to be good for the company or its employees, our management needed a shakeup. By sitting on their hands and letting the company suffer, they made us weak and basically invited these guys into their house. Now we all get to reap what they sowed.
e6bpilot is offline  
Old 06-14-2024, 10:09 AM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Posts: 341
Default

Originally Posted by e6bpilot
I think you answered your own question. They were trying to differentiate themselves by democratizing travel and basically charging a little more but giving everybody the same benefits without the bogus nickel and dime charges. I think that worked well until pretty recently. SWA had a nice middle between legacy airlines and ULCCs. Basic economy fares had the double effect of killing ULCC business (also redeploying domestic capacity to leisure markets) and lowering fares so much that SWA couldn't compete on a price basis.
SWA management is stuck in a rut and is super slow to adapt. The pre board and extra seat scams are perfect examples. They hit social media and now are widely used. Instead of crushing it in the crib, SWA doesn't take a position and ends up ****ing off their loyal customers. They should have rolled out a new product 2 years ago but instead have been doing who knows what while taking fat bonuses and hiring more layers of non revenue producing management.
While I think these vultures are not going to be good for the company or its employees, our management needed a shakeup. By sitting on their hands and letting the company suffer, they made us weak and basically invited these guys into their house. Now we all get to reap what they sowed.
^^^^^this^^^^^
docav8tor is offline  
Old 06-14-2024, 10:11 AM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2020
Posts: 1,891
Default

Originally Posted by jumppilot
Honest question.

Why doesn’t Southwest start charging for bags? Or put some upgraded economy rows they can charge for? Can they charge for a seat assignment? Other airlines have made billions on these fees over the last 15 years.

Might be a catch-22 though. The more they start looking like other airlines, the more people will start shopping other airlines.
Also, not charging for checked bags encourages people to check them (especially less frequent travellers) and in turn allows them to board/deboard with only one FA chastising you about finding a seat quickly and not about stowing your carryons.....

Funny secret is that many, many pax on Delta don't pay for bags either. All you need is the Ccard and/or status and your bags fly free. The fee is to catch the lowballer fare seeking, infrequent traveller and then make up the revenue in add ons.
nene is offline  
Old 06-14-2024, 11:21 AM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2016
Posts: 109
Default

Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
Please elaborate. Genuinely curious.
Elaborate on what? His network strategies have lost this company billions of dollars. Im going to bet the meltdown was closer to 2 billion than the 1.2 stated, cant put a price on the customers we permantly lost. How much money have we lost in Hawaii? I doubt its a money maker. Anyone have any Hawaii flying numbers? Under what senario does any of our leadership get fired?

From Hawaii last year:

Hawaiian’s load factor, a measure of airplane occupancy, was 22 percentage points higher than Southwest’s; passenger revenue per available seat mile, another financial performance measure, was 29.3 cents for Hawaiian versus 10.6 cents for Southwest; and Hawaiian’s average fares of $51 were nearly twice those of Southwest, he said. “Clearly the market dynamics have led to a short-term deterioration of our financial performance in the neighbor islands,” Overbeek said in an interview. But he reiterated an overarching point: even with Southwest dropping fares to compete, “People are choosing us.”

From another article last year:

“Well, they call it the coconut wireless,” said Andrew Watterson, Southwest’s chief operating officer. “Basically, word of mouth is very strong in Hawaii. If you disrespect somebody, if you ill-serve somebody, they'll tell their friends, they'll tell their relatives or tell their cousins, and everybody will know. So, you must establish a brand and a reputation for delivering well.”

The article goes on from Hololulu that Hawaiian at times has cheaper fares than WN. We gutted our main land network and reliability we used to have for this. So to quote Andrew, are we delivering well?
Black Coffee is offline  
Old 06-14-2024, 12:33 PM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PineappleXpres's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2022
Posts: 1,160
Default

Originally Posted by Black Coffee
Elaborate on what? His network strategies have lost this company billions of dollars. Im going to bet the meltdown was closer to 2 billion than the 1.2 stated, cant put a price on the customers we permantly lost. How much money have we lost in Hawaii? I doubt its a money maker. Anyone have any Hawaii flying numbers? Under what senario does any of our leadership get fired?

From Hawaii last year:

Hawaiian’s load factor, a measure of airplane occupancy, was 22 percentage points higher than Southwest’s; passenger revenue per available seat mile, another financial performance measure, was 29.3 cents for Hawaiian versus 10.6 cents for Southwest; and Hawaiian’s average fares of $51 were nearly twice those of Southwest, he said. “Clearly the market dynamics have led to a short-term deterioration of our financial performance in the neighbor islands,” Overbeek said in an interview. But he reiterated an overarching point: even with Southwest dropping fares to compete, “People are choosing us.”

From another article last year:

“Well, they call it the coconut wireless,” said Andrew Watterson, Southwest’s chief operating officer. “Basically, word of mouth is very strong in Hawaii. If you disrespect somebody, if you ill-serve somebody, they'll tell their friends, they'll tell their relatives or tell their cousins, and everybody will know. So, you must establish a brand and a reputation for delivering well.”

The article goes on from Hololulu that Hawaiian at times has cheaper fares than WN. We gutted our main land network and reliability we used to have for this. So to quote Andrew, are we delivering well?
No and all those losses to break in and get market share potentially backfired with the Alaska thing.
PineappleXpres is offline  
Old 06-14-2024, 01:22 PM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,650
Default

Originally Posted by PineappleXpres
No and all those losses to break in and get market share potentially backfired with the Alaska thing.
Couple of experts here, clearly.

Hawaii is a multi layered deal. Even if the flights themselves break even, that whole node of the network is a magnet for the biggest money maker of them all, which is a branded credit card and the associated points.

At this point, they would have cut and run if it was a loser or at least pulled back significantly. The load factors are going to be awful when you fly 175 seat airplanes inter-island. Inter-island loses money so that the rest of it can make money. It was the key that caused the red carpet to get rolled out. Once redeyes come online, (allegedly early 25) I suspect that there will be a lot less aircraft overnighting there.

As for HA and AS, yeah, that's going to clearly change the game. I am interested to see how it all shakes out.
e6bpilot is offline  
Old 06-14-2024, 01:29 PM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PineappleXpres's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2022
Posts: 1,160
Default

Originally Posted by e6bpilot
Couple of experts here, clearly.

Hawaii is a multi layered deal. Even if the flights themselves break even, that whole node of the network is a magnet for the biggest money maker of them all, which is a branded credit card and the associated points.

At this point, they would have cut and run if it was a loser or at least pulled back significantly. The load factors are going to be awful when you fly 175 seat airplanes inter-island. Inter-island loses money so that the rest of it can make money. It was the key that caused the red carpet to get rolled out. Once redeyes come online, (allegedly early 25) I suspect that there will be a lot less aircraft overnighting there.

As for HA and AS, yeah, that's going to clearly change the game. I am interested to see how it all shakes out.
Why didn’t the big 3 come in and do inter island? Why didn’t AAG position Horizon out here? There is a money losing reason. SWA doesn’t need inter island to have a Hawaii credit card foot print. SWA came out to put HAL out and create a monopoly. So yes I’m sure they will reconsider dumping capacity in a saturated money losing market. HAL is the states largest employer and SWA wants street cred even though they are acting like the colonizer.
PineappleXpres is offline  
Old 06-14-2024, 01:43 PM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,650
Default

Originally Posted by PineappleXpres
Why didn’t the big 3 come in and do inter island? Why didn’t AAG position Horizon out here? There is a money losing reason. SWA doesn’t need inter island to have a Hawaii credit card foot print. SWA came out to put HAL out and create a monopoly. So yes I’m sure they will reconsider dumping capacity in a saturated money losing market. HAL is the states largest employer and SWA wants street cred even though they are acting like the colonizer.
Sure, Jan. Sounds like you have done your homework.

Do you mean like the monopoly HAL enjoyed for years after putting Aloha out of business? Watterson, the guy responsible for putting this whole deal together, has said many times in public that inter-island was key to getting local and state government buy-in that got SWA the current footprint it enjoys. Competition is the key to a rational market. Once the interisland market got another player so that HAL was forced to quit fleecing the locals and the Asian tourism market imploded and never really came back, HAL was doomed to failure. It wouldn't have mattered who stepped in. It just happened to be Southwest. I am glad that Hawaiian found a good partner in Alaska and I hope that goes very well for both pilot groups.

I just fly the plane so I don't GAF. I suggest you do the same.
e6bpilot is offline  
Old 06-14-2024, 01:53 PM
  #89  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PineappleXpres's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2022
Posts: 1,160
Default

Originally Posted by e6bpilot
Sure, Jan. Sounds like you have done your homework.

Do you mean like the monopoly HAL enjoyed for years after putting Aloha out of business? Watterson, the guy responsible for putting this whole deal together, has said many times in public that inter-island was key to getting local and state government buy-in that got SWA the current footprint it enjoys.

I just fly the plane so I don't GAF.
HAL and Aloha were given immunity to collaborate on coordinating prices to avoid driving each other out of business. That should offer a peak on how delicate inter island competition is. If it is intended to be a money losing proposition for a company aircraft constrained and uninterested in growing elsewhere then, cool. Been flying inter island most my carrier. Aloha, Hawaiian, and at least two others. I’m no expert, but what SWA management is saying about the Hawaii operation publicly and internally doesn’t add up.

We are both on these boards d:cking around, so I GAF the about the same as you.
PineappleXpres is offline  
Old 06-14-2024, 02:21 PM
  #90  
At your mom's house
 
hoover's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: cpt 737
Posts: 2,797
Default

Sw needs to put a couple dozen 700s over there and use those instead of the max 8.
hoover is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lewbronski
Southwest
150
03-17-2023 07:46 PM
Brakes Set
Southwest
10
06-25-2012 10:03 PM
MatthewAMEL
Southwest
120
11-28-2011 10:26 AM
Sr. Barco
Southwest
44
10-12-2011 07:39 PM
Metal121
Major
20
02-04-2008 08:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices