Activist Investor pushing changes at SWA
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Posts: 340
#13
Line Holder
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Dec 2020
Posts: 41
No matter what happens with the operational changes there will be significant cost cutting.
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,770
#15
But they have forced the sale of some companies, although that's much easier said than done with airlines, especially big ones.
So I think they view SWA as a fix-er up-er project.
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2023
Posts: 514
I think its interesting we have people here complaining that Gary turned the company over to Wall Street, and now folks want a activist investor like Elliot to come in here and dictate change. Elliot was involved in TWA, MCI and WorldCom restructurings and look how those turned out. I'd be careful what you wish for.
Last edited by 5tools; 06-10-2024 at 08:43 AM.
#17
Elliot has a history of tuning companies up, not breaking them into pieces for a fire sale.
But they have forced the sale of some companies, although that's much easier said than done with airlines, especially big ones.
So I think they view SWA as a fix-er up-er project.
But they have forced the sale of some companies, although that's much easier said than done with airlines, especially big ones.
So I think they view SWA as a fix-er up-er project.
Some who yurn for the "good ole days" might bite on that.
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 737CA
Posts: 181
Interesting that AW is the only senior executive that has worked at another airline. All the rest are in house according to Elliot. They only compare SWA to the big three. Almost all metrics are put up against them. Sounds like they want them lean into that direction.
They seem to believe though that the network, dominate market share, great balance sheet, loyality programs, etc can turn this around. My opinion is we all know whats behind door#1. We have no idea whats going to behind door#2.
Top 10 institutional investors own 65% of the company. That's a big nut to crack that have loyality to GK and the board. As of now we are talking about green bars/exto in the fall. Next CEO may just furlough to cut costs. I think one of the problems will be finding a CEO. Not many executives come to airlines. Especially the smart ones. It's usually retread's. Does Elliot wants a turn around guy(Richard Anderson) or someone to take it long term? Either way, if you think BJ's salary is large, wait till they find his replacement.
They seem to believe though that the network, dominate market share, great balance sheet, loyality programs, etc can turn this around. My opinion is we all know whats behind door#1. We have no idea whats going to behind door#2.
Top 10 institutional investors own 65% of the company. That's a big nut to crack that have loyality to GK and the board. As of now we are talking about green bars/exto in the fall. Next CEO may just furlough to cut costs. I think one of the problems will be finding a CEO. Not many executives come to airlines. Especially the smart ones. It's usually retread's. Does Elliot wants a turn around guy(Richard Anderson) or someone to take it long term? Either way, if you think BJ's salary is large, wait till they find his replacement.
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 310
Look at Spirit's and Frontier's performance. The ULCC model is barely hanging on. I would expect an activist investor to want a turn in the other direction toward a legacy model.
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 737CA
Posts: 181
I think its interesting we have people here complaining that Gary turned the company over to Wall Street, and now folks want a activist investor like Elliot to come in here and dictate change. Elliot was involved in TWA, MCI and WorldCom restructurings and look how those turned out. I be careful what you wish for.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post