Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
Activist Investor pushing changes at SWA >

Activist Investor pushing changes at SWA

Search

Notices

Activist Investor pushing changes at SWA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-27-2024, 07:43 AM
  #181  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 30
Default

Originally Posted by MH223
Genuinely worried as a new hire who has been furloughed before.
How new?

filler
ShrtSnorter is offline  
Old 06-27-2024, 07:50 AM
  #182  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Feb 2024
Posts: 12
Default

Originally Posted by ShrtSnorter
How new?

filler
like a class or two above the last class...that new.
MH223 is offline  
Old 06-27-2024, 07:50 AM
  #183  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,720
Default

Originally Posted by MH223
Genuinely worried as a new hire who has been furloughed before.
Furloughing in this economy would be possibly the stupidest move anyone could do. Not only would it incur lots of additional costs, but it would ruin pilot hiring for the next decade for that company. They might threaten furlough or even "not threaten" furlough in order to extract a concession or two, but you don't burn down the house that you own 10 percent of.
Their aim is to get this airline operating like a business, not to hollow it out from the inside. I think as pilots, we will probably see the least amount of changes of any of the big workgroups. If anyone should be worried about their jobs, it would be non union HQ drones who are flex working. I have a feeling a lot of them are going to wake up one day and be locked out of their company email accounts.
e6bpilot is offline  
Old 06-27-2024, 08:30 AM
  #184  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2023
Posts: 534
Default

Originally Posted by e6bpilot
Furloughing in this economy would be possibly the stupidest move anyone could do. Not only would it incur lots of additional costs, but it would ruin pilot hiring for the next decade for that company. They might threaten furlough or even "not threaten" furlough in order to extract a concession or two, but you don't burn down the house that you own 10 percent of.
Their aim is to get this airline operating like a business, not to hollow it out from the inside. I think as pilots, we will probably see the least amount of changes of any of the big workgroups. If anyone should be worried about their jobs, it would be non union HQ drones who are flex working. I have a feeling a lot of them are going to wake up one day and be locked out of their company email accounts.
You do know Elliot is considered a Vulture Capitalist on Wall Street? Now all of sudden they want to come in run a airline. I don't think so.

Paul Singer (businessman) - Wikipedia
5tools is offline  
Old 06-27-2024, 10:17 AM
  #185  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,406
Default

Originally Posted by 5tools
You do know Elliot is considered a Vulture Capitalist on Wall Street? Now all of sudden they want to come in run a airline. I don't think so.

Paul Singer (businessman) - Wikipedia
Such behavior has to be tempered when it comes to airlines. Too much disruption and uncertainty impacts safety, and the regulators get a vote.

Especially with what amounts to Too Big to Fail national economic infrastructure (Big 4 and maybe even AS and B6).

Fine tuning could occur. Scorched earth re-organization I doubt very much.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 06-27-2024, 10:28 AM
  #186  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: Gear slinger
Posts: 2,980
Default

Originally Posted by e6bpilot
Furloughing in this economy would be possibly the stupidest move anyone could do. Not only would it incur lots of additional costs, but it would ruin pilot hiring for the next decade for that company. They might threaten furlough or even "not threaten" furlough in order to extract a concession or two, but you don't burn down the house that you own 10 percent of.
Their aim is to get this airline operating like a business, not to hollow it out from the inside. I think as pilots, we will probably see the least amount of changes of any of the big workgroups. If anyone should be worried about their jobs, it would be non union HQ drones who are flex working. I have a feeling a lot of them are going to wake up one day and be locked out of their company email accounts.
The goal is getting SWA to uperate like a modern airline. For the pilot group, that means PBS and all the staffing efficiency that creates. Unless they expand flying significantly with new destinations and red eyes, that's a 10-20% in reduction in required headcount. I would not be so enthusiastic about Elliot managements plans if I was a SWA pilot. Current management may be mediocre but at least they're relatively consistent.
Otterbox is offline  
Old 06-27-2024, 10:36 AM
  #187  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,406
Default

Originally Posted by Otterbox
Unless they expand flying significantly with new destinations and red eyes, that's a 10-20% in reduction in required headcount.
Not necessarily that much reduction. I assume the existing CBA doesn't grant the company carte blanche to implement PBS. So they would need to negotiate the rules and parameters... if you're going to lose X time off from say trip touching, you can simply get it back in trade, more vacation, etc.

There's no obvious reason that SWAPA would need to grant concessions in the current economic climate (boeing is a wildcard I guess).

AS is a little over-staffed due to PBS landing at exactly the same moment as the latest MAX debacle. No furloughs imminent over there.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 06-27-2024, 11:04 AM
  #188  
At your mom's house
 
hoover's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: cpt 737
Posts: 2,832
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Not necessarily that much reduction. I assume the existing CBA doesn't grant the company carte blanche to implement PBS. So they would need to negotiate the rules and parameters... if you're going to lose X time off from say trip touching, you can simply get it back in trade, more vacation, etc.

There's no obvious reason that SWAPA would need to grant concessions in the current economic climate (boeing is a wildcard I guess).

AS is a little over-staffed due to PBS landing at exactly the same moment as the latest MAX debacle. No furloughs imminent over there.
SW doesnt do PBS because they already work the pilots 30% more than other airlines. They wouldnt get much of a benefit
hoover is offline  
Old 06-27-2024, 11:45 AM
  #189  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Mozam's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Position: Left
Posts: 1,275
Default

Originally Posted by Otterbox
The goal is getting SWA to uperate like a modern airline. For the pilot group, that means PBS and all the staffing efficiency that creates. Unless they expand flying significantly with new destinations and red eyes, that's a 10-20% in reduction in required headcount. I would not be so enthusiastic about Elliot managements plans if I was a SWA pilot. Current management may be mediocre but at least they're relatively consistent.

I do not think anyone at SWA is enthusiastic about Elliot. What makes you think anyone is ?
Mozam is offline  
Old 06-27-2024, 12:13 PM
  #190  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Avroman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: FIRE ALPA
Posts: 3,100
Default

Originally Posted by hoover
SW doesnt do PBS because they already work the pilots 30% more than other airlines. They wouldnt get much of a benefit
PBS will really screw us in vacation and training months, not so much in monthly schedules unless they change how our pairings are constructed. Between tomorrow and 7/14 I have 3 full days at home coming. PBS can't work me more than that, though bad pairings would pay me less. That said, they better have thier bankruptcy filing ready if they expect to get PBS, that turd isn't getting voted in here willingly.
Avroman is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lewbronski
Southwest
150
03-17-2023 08:46 PM
Brakes Set
Southwest
10
06-25-2012 11:03 PM
MatthewAMEL
Southwest
120
11-28-2011 11:26 AM
Sr. Barco
Southwest
44
10-12-2011 08:39 PM
Metal121
Major
20
02-04-2008 09:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices