Search

Notices

MAX7

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-30-2024, 09:03 AM
  #71  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jun 2023
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 22
Default

Originally Posted by Otterbox
Up to a two year delay in certification. Theres no political at the moment will to offer Boeing a safety exemption for the Max and they know it.
Boeing hasnt prioritized a fix because they thought they had two years to get it done. My guess is they have a fix ready for the -7 (and all varients for that matter) within a year from now.
JimmyDean is offline  
Old 01-30-2024, 09:05 AM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2StgTurbine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,339
Default

Originally Posted by Privateer89
Government control is never the answer.
Ahh, so you think we live in a fantasy land a 100% free market is possible. Even if that ideology is correct, it would require so many fundamental changes to society that it will never happen. Our version of a free market has failed. Boeing screwed up with MCAS, caused over 300 people to die, grounded the fleet for years, and cost investors and stakeholders billions of dollars. You would think that would be enough of a shock to the system to cause major changes within Boeing. Yet just a few years later, Boeing is more concerned about getting out of the financial hole the Max grounding caused and is focusing its energy on increasing production rates rather than ensuring quality. So yeah, right now an FAA inspector overlooking the assembly of every 737 would probably be a good thing.

There needs to be some major leadership change on Boeing at every level before they can be trusted again. We can't rely on the free market to force that change. Wall Street knows there are no other competitors in the world. If a company wants to switch its orders from Boeing to Airbus, it will take a decade. That's not a realist competitor. So there are no free market forces capable of improving the situation. If you actually want a more competitive aviation market, then you should be happy the FAA is getting involved. They are the only ones that can actually punish Boeing. That will make Boeing a less capable manufacturer. They will lose market share and allow room for other manufacturers to expand and maybe grow to a point where they can offer a realistic third option.
2StgTurbine is offline  
Old 01-30-2024, 11:08 AM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2023
Posts: 250
Default

SWA prepared to wait..

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/s...173317726.html
Traffic Alert is offline  
Old 01-30-2024, 11:35 AM
  #74  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2023
Position: First Officer/Military Pilot
Posts: 50
Default

Originally Posted by Traffic Alert
Well they can't just tell the world they're looking at other options when they're trying to get bigger discounts...
RealEstatePilot is offline  
Old 01-30-2024, 12:03 PM
  #75  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 78
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
Ahh, so you think we live in a fantasy land a 100% free market is possible. Even if that ideology is correct, it would require so many fundamental changes to society that it will never happen. Our version of a free market has failed. Boeing screwed up with MCAS, caused over 300 people to die, grounded the fleet for years, and cost investors and stakeholders billions of dollars. You would think that would be enough of a shock to the system to cause major changes within Boeing. Yet just a few years later, Boeing is more concerned about getting out of the financial hole the Max grounding caused and is focusing its energy on increasing production rates rather than ensuring quality. So yeah, right now an FAA inspector overlooking the assembly of every 737 would probably be a good thing.

There needs to be some major leadership change on Boeing at every level before they can be trusted again. We can't rely on the free market to force that change. Wall Street knows there are no other competitors in the world. If a company wants to switch its orders from Boeing to Airbus, it will take a decade. That's not a realist competitor. So there are no free market forces capable of improving the situation. If you actually want a more competitive aviation market, then you should be happy the FAA is getting involved. They are the only ones that can actually punish Boeing. That will make Boeing a less capable manufacturer. They will lose market share and allow room for other manufacturers to expand and maybe grow to a point where they can offer a realistic third option.
It’s easy to be mad at Boeing. They’re a faceless company that makes inanimate machines, which occasionally malfunction, causing people to die. The truth is that most airline crashes/incidents/mishaps are caused by human error. Should we regulate all pilots and airlines to make sure this never happens again? A flight crew consisting of a Captain, FO, and Fed for each flight. This government employee will make sure we never make any mistakes. I think it’s obvious that this would lead to so many more problems than solutions.

I agree with you about the challenges of the free market in this environment. Boeing and Airbus are practically branches of the American and French government, which is why we are in this problem. It would be nice if we had the competition of the business jet market. They are leaps and bounds ahead of us here at the airlines.
Privateer89 is offline  
Old 01-30-2024, 12:07 PM
  #76  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,783
Default

Originally Posted by Traffic Alert
Oh 🤬 me. That’s ridiculous.
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Old 01-30-2024, 12:22 PM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2023
Posts: 250
Default

Originally Posted by RealEstatePilot
Well they can't just tell the world they're looking at other options when they're trying to get bigger discounts...
I'd make an offer for HA if I were them. At least get WB here in the meantime.
Traffic Alert is offline  
Old 01-30-2024, 01:04 PM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,783
Default

Originally Posted by traffic alert
i'd make an offer for ha if i were them. At least get wb here in the meantime.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

……….
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Old 01-30-2024, 01:05 PM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Posts: 341
Default

Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
Oh 🤬 me. That’s ridiculous.
Just keep kicking the can further down the road.
docav8tor is offline  
Old 01-30-2024, 04:35 PM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2020
Posts: 324
Default

Originally Posted by Mozam
Get some 787s and fly them on the heavy load routes. Does not necessarily need to be all Hawaii. Yes, I do realize that the 787 will be very hard to fly it like a 200
United has 150 787s on order and we can’t even get our next one until September. They are putting out about 4 a month right now worldwide. I think a new customer could expect to get a plane in 2032, which is probably the next delivery spot for a new customer. Maybe someone is selling used 787s?
FriendlyPilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SwaynesWorld
United
27
07-22-2022 09:02 AM
yellowNEO
Southwest
90
06-23-2022 01:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices