Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
Southwest Pilots denied by NMB… >

Southwest Pilots denied by NMB…

Search

Notices

Southwest Pilots denied by NMB…

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-03-2023, 02:27 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 312
Default

I think it’s very important for us to show max participation in SWAPA’s newest poll when it opens. Make sure SWAPA knows (and can show the company) we’re ready to go the distance.
RckyMtHigh is offline  
Old 08-03-2023, 02:30 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,264
Default

Originally Posted by ZapBrannigan
what if SWAPA just terminated negotiations. Walked away. And said "call us when you're ready to seriously consider the rewrite we gave you a few years ago"?

It only hurts their efforts to recruit and retain enough pilots to staff the operation. They think they can solve their problems by matching everybody else's 737 pay and nothing else.

Well, I'd be willing to bet their lines at WIA, OBAP, etc would be mighty short if we denied them the ability to even do that.

im in no hurry. Let's walk out of the dealership and see if they don't call in a few days.
My guess is if we did something like that, it could form the basis of a bad faith bargaining claim against SWAPA. My perception is that most pilots misunderstand the RLA’s “reasonability” clause (both sides must “exert every reasonable to make and maintain agreements”) as applying mostly to what we are demanding. In reality, the reasonability clause is much more about how we negotiate.

Use Google Scholar or Casetext.com to search for the following case and read it: 976 F.2d 541 (1992), ASSOCIATION of FLIGHT ATTENDANTS, AFL-CIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HORIZON AIR INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

It offers some pretty good insight on reasonability and good faith bargaining under the RLA.
Lewbronski is offline  
Old 08-03-2023, 02:50 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2016
Posts: 111
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Strongest financials in the industry would certainly be one reason. Pilots generally can’t see beyond 6 Months ahead. It wasn’t that long ago when SWA was the place to be. In 2 years the rankings of where new hires want to go first will be quite different from today.
Balance sheets are for shareholders, not for employee payroll checks. I would argue SWA is in a position to furlough and retrain faster than any other airline because of one fleet type and minimal retirements.
Black Coffee is offline  
Old 08-03-2023, 03:57 PM
  #24  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2019
Posts: 38
Default

Originally Posted by ZapBrannigan
what if SWAPA just terminated negotiations. Walked away. And said "call us when you're ready to seriously consider the rewrite we gave you a few years ago"?

It only hurts their efforts to recruit and retain enough pilots to staff the operation. They think they can solve their problems by matching everybody else's 737 pay and nothing else.

Well, I'd be willing to bet their lines at WIA, OBAP, etc would be mighty short if we denied them the ability to even do that.

im in no hurry. Let's walk out of the dealership and see if they don't call in a few days.
I'm not sure terminating negotiations is productive. At least not in the eyes of mediation. I do however belive holding firm on our asks in mediation is vital. It seems to me obvious that management will pushback hard on our asks for whatever reason they concoct as reasonable. For this reason we must allow our NC to speak for us and continue to push for our asks. They can only accomplish this with our support as a group.

The game plan for managment is to tire us out. Turn us on our union leadership and question their methods. This will inevitably happen with some. The issue I see is those that fall to this mindset will spread this mentality throughout our group creating division among us. Once the division is created leverage will lean into the management corner. At that point pressure will build on our union to push a subpar TA that might or might not get voted in.

Right now our jobs as "union" members is to stay united. Let our leadership do what they need to do to give us the best TA. Once that TA is out to vote on, by all means scrutinize and debate it on its own merit. But until then all I am saying is we will have to be patient and wait. Don't turn on eachother. It only helps them not us.
Grishka is offline  
Old 08-03-2023, 04:13 PM
  #25  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: CA
Posts: 15
Default

Originally Posted by RckyMtHigh
We should picket at WIA, OBAP, 225… wherever SWA has a recruiting presence.
I'm not at SWA so i dont have a dog in the fight but if your union has the balls to do that you'd get max respect!!!!!
champ2kt is offline  
Old 08-03-2023, 04:15 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,264
Default

Originally Posted by Grishka
I'm not sure terminating negotiations is productive. At least not in the eyes of mediation. I do however belive holding firm on our asks demands in mediation is vital. It seems to me obvious that management will pushback hard on our asks for whatever reason they concoct as reasonable. For this reason we must allow our NC to speak for us and continue to push for our asks. They can only accomplish this with our support as a group.
Yes, holding firm to our demands (fixed it for you) is vital. There is zero reason at this point in negotiations/mediation to move to the position of the company. We have already compromised more than we have needed to. That's not my opinion. That's RLA case law:

It is well settled, however, that movement toward the position of the other side is not a requirement of good faith bargaining ... Mere insistence on demands that seem extremely harsh to the other side and that a neutral party may consider "hard" is not a violation of bargaining duties.(Independent Federation of Flight Attendants v. TWA, 682 F.Supp. 1003 (1988))
​​​​​​​The court said, "In finding a violation of the obligation to bargain in good faith based exclusively on contract proposals the Board is in effect doing that which it is prohibited from doing —sitting in judgment upon the substantive terms of a proposed collective bargaining agreement." Id. n. 7. It is "permissible for a party to engage in ‘bargaining,' utilizing its economic power to its advantage to retain as many rights as possible" subject only to necessity that there be a subjective "desire to reach ultimate agreement." (Independent Federation of Flight Attendants v. TWA, 682 F.Supp. 1003 (1988))
​​​​​​​Plaintiff misconceives the scope of the duty "to exert every reasonable effort" to reach an agreement, which does not require one side to accede to the other's proposals:
[M]ovement toward the position of the other side is not a requirement of good faith bargaining.... Mere insistence on demands that seem extremely harsh to the other side and that a neutral party may consider "hard" is not a violation of bargaining duties. An employer may insist on positions consistent with ... its asserted needs, even if the union may consider the proposals greedy.(US Airlines Pilots Association v. US Airways, Inc, and US Airways Group, Inc, 859 F.Supp.2d.283 (2012))
Lewbronski is offline  
Old 08-03-2023, 05:59 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 3,778
Default

Originally Posted by Grishka
I'm not sure terminating negotiations is productive. At least not in the eyes of mediation. I do however belive holding firm on our asks in mediation is vital. It seems to me obvious that management will pushback hard on our asks for whatever reason they concoct as reasonable. For this reason we must allow our NC to speak for us and continue to push for our asks. They can only accomplish this with our support as a group.

The game plan for managment is to tire us out. Turn us on our union leadership and question their methods. This will inevitably happen with some. The issue I see is those that fall to this mindset will spread this mentality throughout our group creating division among us. Once the division is created leverage will lean into the management corner. At that point pressure will build on our union to push a subpar TA that might or might not get voted in.

Right now our jobs as "union" members is to stay united. Let our leadership do what they need to do to give us the best TA. Once that TA is out to vote on, by all means scrutinize and debate it on its own merit. But until then all I am saying is we will have to be patient and wait. Don't turn on eachother. It only helps them not us.
I’m ready to take this to a walk. The company can pound sand.
Cyio is offline  
Old 08-03-2023, 07:53 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,776
Default

NMB told us to stay in mediation... So what? As far as I'm concerned, nothing's changed, and personally, I have zero interest in settling for anything short. If the rumors are true that we don't have many applications, then it's on the company to fix or else their expansion plans go right down the toilet for the lack of crew.

Be patient, stay resilient and no compromises on industry-leading contract in every possible aspect.. and don't just fixate. Just like our NC the company may try to sweeten the pot with rates and retro.... Sorry, not good enough. Industry-leading in every aspect.
RJSAviator76 is offline  
Old 08-03-2023, 09:59 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 137
Default

As most people seem to realize this is in no way unexpected. It was a bit of a long shot to get released this early, but couldn’t hurt to try considering our mediator and the current makeup of the board.

Like Lew said, all release precedent is based almost purely on time. We have to wait, potentially up to a year.

Our asks however, like Lew said, can increase, as inflation continues to increase cost of living.

Support your union, state your (increasing) requirements in the upcoming survey, and go back to business as usual.

There’s nothing confusing about this process, but it does take time. Patience will reward us.
bay982 is offline  
Old 08-04-2023, 12:20 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,803
Default

Originally Posted by RckyMtHigh
We should picket at WIA, OBAP, 225… wherever SWA has a recruiting presence.
This is a brilliant idea!

🔥👇
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bay982
Southwest
26
03-14-2023 10:42 PM
Codfather
Major
103
02-11-2019 04:40 PM
Purple Drank
Major
0
10-02-2014 04:07 PM
G-Dog
Regional
236
06-27-2009 02:19 PM
captain_drew
Major
0
04-14-2005 02:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices