Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
DL TA career earnings >$4.4M more than SWA >

DL TA career earnings >$4.4M more than SWA

Search

Notices

DL TA career earnings >$4.4M more than SWA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-01-2023, 02:14 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,920
Default

Originally Posted by RJSAviator76
Personally, I don't think much of Delta this time around, especially how they donated their retro back to the company and Wall Street. They had it all and they choked. They'll hide behind pay banding and soft money, which is great. But this was the generational opportunity and from what I've read, they've squandered it.
Rates should’ve been higher….but they got a lot of QOL items and scope issues ironed out. For not having a single concession it’s not completely awful. All my DL friends are hoping now that the bar is set that UAL will best the rates followed by AA and the me-too’s will get the rates more where they should be.
flyguy81 is offline  
Old 03-01-2023, 02:45 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,143
Default

Originally Posted by flyguy81
Rates should’ve been higher….but they got a lot of QOL items and scope issues ironed out. For not having a single concession it’s not completely awful. All my DL friends are hoping now that the bar is set that UAL will best the rates followed by AA and the me-too’s will get the rates more where they should be.

why on earth would UA or AA give higher rates knowing Delta will match them. They are just going to match Delta’s rates, because that is all they have to do.
PNWFlyer is offline  
Old 03-01-2023, 03:06 PM
  #43  
At your mom's house
 
hoover's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: cpt 737
Posts: 2,798
Default

Originally Posted by PNWFlyer
why on earth would UA or AA give higher rates knowing Delta will match them. They are just going to match Delta’s rates, because that is all they have to do.
That would be awesome if both if them did exact rates. I never liked all the me too language in the new CBAs. Ir allows the company to not need to offer market rates. The AS average deal was even worse.
hoover is offline  
Old 03-01-2023, 09:06 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,920
Default

Originally Posted by PNWFlyer
why on earth would UA or AA give higher rates knowing Delta will match them. They are just going to match Delta’s rates, because that is all they have to do.
Because mgt are narcissists and want to be the best. Kirby at UAL has already said he wants a deal done soon that will make UAL the premier airline for people to work at. People look at QOL and pay…if you want to hire 150+/mo you’re gonna need a big carrot….being the best paid is a big carrot.

UAL got a 5% bump due to their Covid LOA. Think they’ll agree to a 10% raise to match DL or go for more? AA will likely just match whatever is the higher of the two.

Would be much easier if negotiated rates were the same (I was hoping for better rates so I want the me too’s to kick in to raise them just so CK, GK and BJ have to eat a **** salad)
flyguy81 is offline  
Old 03-01-2023, 10:35 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,264
Default

Here's a screen shot from a beta site that can model and compare career compensation at various airlines with various career progressions. This screen shot is a model of one of the progressions already discussed here. Note that the time in each fleet/seat position shown in the legend is time spent at that position, not time since hired. The final position shown is held though the 30-year point.

Comparison Screen Shot JPG.jpg
Lewbronski is offline  
Old 03-02-2023, 06:54 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,920
Default

Originally Posted by Lewbronski
Here's a screen shot from a beta site that can model and compare career compensation at various airlines with various career progressions. This screen shot is a model of one of the progressions already discussed here. Note that the time in each fleet/seat position shown in the legend is time spent at that position, not time since hired. The final position shown is held though the 30-year point.

Attachment 7486
Say we match DL 737-900 rates, 757 rates, or 777 rates….

what’s the comparison then?
flyguy81 is offline  
Old 03-02-2023, 07:35 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Giordano Bruno's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2019
Posts: 205
Default

Originally Posted by RJSAviator76
Career earnings should interest us all and that's how we should approach our own negotiations.
Yet you trash the Delta contract thread bashing everything they've done to give you a tailwind. Classic small ******* syndrome.
Giordano Bruno is offline  
Old 03-02-2023, 09:17 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,737
Default

Originally Posted by tlamjaj
You must not be a new hire. The majority of current ones are choosing airlines based on QOL and bases, not career earnings. But even then, some are getting screwed getting assigned to a widebody fleet that doesn’t have a domicile in their home base, and having to commute for years to 12 days off on reserve.
virtually nobody is “getting screwed” by widebody assignments. They go senior in class, and anyone wishing to change can do so by breaking a seatlock in a year.
OOfff is offline  
Old 03-02-2023, 09:56 AM
  #49  
At your mom's house
 
hoover's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: cpt 737
Posts: 2,798
Default

Originally Posted by Giordano Bruno
Yet you trash the Delta contract thread bashing everything they've done to give you a tailwind. Classic small ******* syndrome.
I think what he is saying is you guys could've gotten more. You had a great SAV vote and had momentum.
hoover is offline  
Old 03-02-2023, 10:25 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,264
Default

Originally Posted by hoover
I think what he is saying is you guys could've gotten more. You had a great SAV vote and had momentum.
Yes, they absolutely could have done much better. One big problem is, if you read their forum from the time when the TA was released, they fell for one of the mediator’s go-to tactics: the mediator threatened to put the negotiations “on ice” for an extended period of time.

They clearly don’t understand that the mediator only has so much power to control the schedule of negotiations. The mediator cannot put a dispute on ice forever. I’ve written extensively about the detailed reasons why that’s the case in the past. Search the forum if you’d like to understand precisely why that’s the case.

Among other things, apparently their union, like our’s, doesn’t put quotes like the following on blast so that every single member has an appreciation for how the mediator operates:

Accordingly, although it is possible to construe the Chairman's remark as meaning that he is giving up on mediation, we do not think it appropriate for a court to examine a Board
member's statements, made in the course of mediation, so critically. Successful mediators
often liberally use blarney (hoomalimali in Hawaiian) as one of their mediation tools. The Chairman's statement may well have been a ploy. By inquiring as to the true meaning of such a statement we could well undermine its entire purpose by forcing the Board to admit it was a tactic to spur negotiations
or,

​​​​​​​The NMB is free to "experiment with any mediation device that can fairly be said to be
designed to settle a dispute without a strike and does not independently offend other
laws."
IOW, the mediator can lie to your face - they can really do anything they want to twist your arm or ******* with your mind into agreeing - as long as it doesn’t involve literally committing a crime like putting a gun to the NC chair’s head or similar.

So, Delta fell for the mediator’s lies.

Successful SAV or not, we’re in danger of the same unless SWAPA steps up their educational efforts.
Lewbronski is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StillFlying
FedEx
103
10-22-2019 01:51 PM
krudawg
United
12
01-24-2018 06:41 PM
candlerman
Southwest
12
02-23-2012 05:35 PM
StormChaser
Major
378
08-10-2009 12:25 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices