Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
1,221 Reasons Not to work for Southwest >

1,221 Reasons Not to work for Southwest

Search

Notices

1,221 Reasons Not to work for Southwest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-18-2023, 11:52 PM
  #281  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 291
Default

Originally Posted by e6bpilot
Right, because that's what Tucker said!

Someone, anyone give me one concrete example of how DEI is negatively effecting you in your job. Not so and so said this or that or I heard this or a check airman said that. A verifiable concrete example of diversity trumping ability.

Anyone who has been in the military in the last 30 years knows these programs come and go in different flavors, but in the end, they are designed for the 2 percent that can't wrap their brains around the fact that someone who doesn't look like them may be invited to do their job. For the other 98 percent of us, we just keep doing what we were doing and everything is fine.

The outrage news media loves this stuff. They are getting killer ratings with it because it is so upsetting.
Let’s say you were falsely accused of being racist towards a coworker of another race. Would you rather be a white guy, or a black guy in that particular situation? Would it matter at all?
usernamehere is offline  
Old 03-19-2023, 07:16 AM
  #282  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,783
Default

Originally Posted by e6bpilot
Right, because that's what Tucker said!

Someone, anyone give me one concrete example of how DEI is negatively effecting you in your job. Not so and so said this or that or I heard this or a check airman said that. A verifiable concrete example of diversity trumping ability.

Anyone who has been in the military in the last 30 years knows these programs come and go in different flavors, but in the end, they are designed for the 2 percent that can't wrap their brains around the fact that someone who doesn't look like them may be invited to do their job. For the other 98 percent of us, we just keep doing what we were doing and everything is fine.

The outrage news media loves this stuff. They are getting killer ratings with it because it is so upsetting.
I don’t watch Tucker nor do I need to watch MSM to formulate opinions about the world I observe around me.
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Old 03-19-2023, 08:04 AM
  #283  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2021
Posts: 367
Default

Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
I don’t watch Tucker nor do I need to watch MSM to formulate opinions about the world I observe around me.
I always find it funny when people immediately like to label others who have a different opinion from them or don’t think like they do. When you have a different opinion, don’t think like a sheep, can think for yourself, present facts instead of what’s ‘approved’ per the narrative that’s being peddled, you’re immediately labeled a ‘Tucker fan,’ a ‘fox watcher,’ etc. NO, don’t watch fox either. Not even close.

I don’t understand why fox is the default label for some regarding others they don’t like or disagree with.
Cleared4appch is offline  
Old 03-19-2023, 08:25 AM
  #284  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,764
Default

Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
I don’t watch Tucker nor do I need to watch MSM to formulate opinions about the world I observe around me.
It's amazing how many people on both sides of political spectrum in this country are incapable of their own independent thought... Good on you.
RJSAviator76 is offline  
Old 03-19-2023, 09:44 AM
  #285  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Mar 2023
Posts: 1
Default

Originally Posted by e6bpilot
Right, because that's what Tucker said!

Someone, anyone give me one concrete example of how DEI is negatively effecting you in your job. Not so and so said this or that or I heard this or a check airman said that. A verifiable concrete example of diversity trumping ability.

Anyone who has been in the military in the last 30 years knows these programs come and go in different flavors, but in the end, they are designed for the 2 percent that can't wrap their brains around the fact that someone who doesn't look like them may be invited to do their job. For the other 98 percent of us, we just keep doing what we were doing and everything is fine.

The outrage news media loves this stuff. They are getting killer ratings with it because it is so upsetting.
"Because that's what Tucker said" is something someone says when they know they already have a losing argument. One is pre labeling any opposition as irrational in order to discredit the merits of any opposing remarks. No different from labeling someone a koolaid drinker or auto "no" voter.

What came first... the DEI or the DEI outrage? Answer this and then tell me which is divisive.

Concrete examples... DEI causes outrage(as admitted), which when virtue signaled from a company who has a VP of DEI through frequent company comms: 1. divides our company and union through anger directed towards each other as result of company policy; 2. creates distractions on a flight deck if discussed as it is very controversial; 3. creates distrust towards a company that seems to value DEI over a competent operation; 4. puts emphasis on an agenda before experience, as the moment flying experience yields to anything else, it is no longer the chief concern.

And if we are feeling so equitable, let's support a contract that has every position at this company paid the same salary, despite job description, qualifications and longevity. I believe there is a form of governing that may best describe this practice.

DEI, like the recent vax mandates, is a tool implemented by authorities to simply demoralize a segment, create division, and grab power. And the brilliance of it is that with just a small injection of controversy by the puppet masters, the puppets will destroy themselves. Same effects with stuff like pay MOUs in open negotiations and early ELITT openings(intentional or unintentional) create outrage through controversy.

A divided group is easier to rule. Eye on the prize... C2020.

Just like labeling arguments, let's not label people. This is a business, not a charity; best person for the task at hand. Companies with this approach will win, not get the participation medal.
ooogaboooga is offline  
Old 03-19-2023, 10:22 AM
  #286  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 326
Default

Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
I don’t watch Tucker nor do I need to watch MSM to formulate opinions about the world I observe around me.
Thanks! Same here. We went without a tv for about 15 years. TV is a massive time waster. We did buy one almost two years ago but do not have cable or any streaming that allows Fox News. Yet, if I have an experiential based opinion, the know it all “non-judgmental”, “inclusive” crowd assumes to know my thoughts and background by confidently declaring that I have no rational reason to believe what I believe and that I’ve been duped by listening to Fox News or specifically, Tucker Carlson. AIl this while raging at others about making assumptions. 🌎🤡
Liberty is offline  
Old 03-19-2023, 11:11 AM
  #287  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 609
Default

Originally Posted by BZC17
How did we get to dei from 1221? Start another thread please if you want to go down that rabbit hole. 1221 was based off warn letters sent out early to scare swapa into a 10% reduction. We can all agree on that. Keep your Fox News/MSNBC/CNN etc… drivel out of this thread please.
10% concessions PLUS ‘Force Majeure’

The FM grab was very dangerous.
Strategically stupid move on the Ford Harrison people.
Hobbit64 is offline  
Old 03-19-2023, 12:06 PM
  #288  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,650
Default

Originally Posted by ooogaboooga
"Because that's what Tucker said" is something someone says when they know they already have a losing argument. One is pre labeling any opposition as irrational in order to discredit the merits of any opposing remarks. No different from labeling someone a koolaid drinker or auto "no" voter.

What came first... the DEI or the DEI outrage? Answer this and then tell me which is divisive.

Concrete examples... DEI causes outrage(as admitted), which when virtue signaled from a company who has a VP of DEI through frequent company comms: 1. divides our company and union through anger directed towards each other as result of company policy; 2. creates distractions on a flight deck if discussed as it is very controversial; 3. creates distrust towards a company that seems to value DEI over a competent operation; 4. puts emphasis on an agenda before experience, as the moment flying experience yields to anything else, it is no longer the chief concern.

And if we are feeling so equitable, let's support a contract that has every position at this company paid the same salary, despite job description, qualifications and longevity. I believe there is a form of governing that may best describe this practice.

DEI, like the recent vax mandates, is a tool implemented by authorities to simply demoralize a segment, create division, and grab power. And the brilliance of it is that with just a small injection of controversy by the puppet masters, the puppets will destroy themselves. Same effects with stuff like pay MOUs in open negotiations and early ELITT openings(intentional or unintentional) create outrage through controversy.

A divided group is easier to rule. Eye on the prize... C2020.

Just like labeling arguments, let's not label people. This is a business, not a charity; best person for the task at hand. Companies with this approach will win, not get the participation medal.
Not losing anything and not arguing anything. I used Tucker Carlson because he is a talking head who specifically called out Southwest in his segment for DEI practices in the airlines and then went on to use examples that had nothing to do with DEI or Southwest and only showed that he had no idea what the heck he was talking about when it comes to airlines. There is also an active poster on the union forum that is repeatedly posting his stuff to make points about the same topic. If you are based in the central time zone, there is a good chance that you are going to watch Fox News in the lounge, during preflight on the captains iPad, and during cruise flight. I don't personally watch the cable news, but a good portion of our pilots are zealots and believe everything that the right wing outrage media says even though it has been proven through legal discovery of text messages that fox doesn't even believe what they say.

You and I agree that this topic is divisive. I am asserting that it is unnecessarily divisive and much of that division is based on false outrage brought to you by the cable news media and internet who have decided to choose DEI and ESG as the talking points du jour in order to get their target audience all upset so that they can tune in and get their endorphin fix.

For those of you who are parroting exactly what he has said and claim that you got there of your own accord, I call shenanigans. Maybe you don't watch him, which is a start, but you are definitely dipping your toes in the same pool of BS that he is spouting.

Yes, the company is leaning into it pretty heavily. If you play the long game and maybe wait a few months and let them get it out of their system by ignoring it, I am willing to bet that you will be much happier and more focused on things you can change like our contract or spending time on a hobby or family.

I know this won't make any difference to those who get their kicks by being angry, but there it is.

Still waiting for those concrete examples of how DEI has effected safety at Southwest Airlines. The examples above are suppositions and generalizations.
e6bpilot is offline  
Old 03-19-2023, 12:22 PM
  #289  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Grumpyaviator's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,030
Default

My own surmising but, the DEI/ESG push seemed to accelerate during covid when “WEF Gary” secured billions in cash from financiers. I wonder if that financing was from WEF-tied banks which are driving the company in that direction.

btw, I don’t believe that DEI is responsible for the recent close calls (as Tucker and other sensationalists say), but there is a difference between equality and the modern push for equity. Marshall and King fought for the principles that race, gender, etc should not be a barrier to prevent qualified people from achieving their goals and living up to their potential. DEI and intersectionality OTH, use race, gender, etc to propel the unqualified into positions beyond their ability.

That’s not so prevalent at our level, but at the leadership levels where the core fundamentals of running a sound business are being neglected for the sake of DEI/ESG.

A book I highly recommend, as the husband and father of black Americans, is Fault Lines by Voddie Baucham. He intelligently breaks down SJ movements, their roots, true agenda and where they’re actually trying to take us.

Last edited by Grumpyaviator; 03-19-2023 at 12:46 PM.
Grumpyaviator is offline  
Old 03-19-2023, 03:09 PM
  #290  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 173
Default

Originally Posted by Grumpyaviator
My own surmising but, the DEI/ESG push seemed to accelerate during covid when “WEF Gary” secured billions in cash from financiers. I wonder if that financing was from WEF-tied banks which are driving the company in that direction.

btw, I don’t believe that DEI is responsible for the recent close calls (as Tucker and other sensationalists say), but there is a difference between equality and the modern push for equity. Marshall and King fought for the principles that race, gender, etc should not be a barrier to prevent qualified people from achieving their goals and living up to their potential. DEI and intersectionality OTH, use race, gender, etc to propel the unqualified into positions beyond their ability.

That’s not so prevalent at our level, but at the leadership levels where the core fundamentals of running a sound business are being neglected for the sake of DEI/ESG.

A book I highly recommend, as the husband and father of black Americans, is Fault Lines by Voddie Baucham. He intelligently breaks down SJ movements, their roots, true agenda and where they’re actually trying to take us.
THIS. ^^^^^^^^ Voddie is the man! However, realize we are in the minority grumpyaviator…and getting smaller. The worldview that drives us is slowly being eradicated…but we know how it ends

Poopoo out.
poopooplatter is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
cargofast
FedEx
60
09-04-2021 04:47 PM
Southerner
Major
264
02-07-2013 06:28 PM
deltabound
Foreign
18
03-28-2010 02:49 PM
tomderekc
Flight Schools and Training
25
11-14-2009 03:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices