Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
1,221 Reasons Not to work for Southwest >

1,221 Reasons Not to work for Southwest

Search

Notices

1,221 Reasons Not to work for Southwest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-31-2023, 06:45 PM
  #1471  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 350
Default

[QUOTE 11k + different opinions and priorities.[/QUOTE]

…and the company has one. We lose. The end.
Liberty is offline  
Old 11-01-2023, 12:49 AM
  #1472  
At your mom's house
 
hoover's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: cpt 737
Posts: 2,832
Default

Originally Posted by e6bpilot
Zap isn't wrong. We are past V1, my dudes.

Once this thing gets thrown out there, I plan on picking it apart with a fine toothed comb, as will others. I am sure there will be some feisty discussion. I don't think we are going to like everything about it, but it needs to reflect the market conditions, which are amazingly in our favor. Next negotiating cycle probably won't be.

My opinion only, unless this is spectacular (and it may be, not sure yet), I think it's headed towards another round of negotiations. With all that being said, I may like it. If I do, I'll vote for it.

No fatigue here. My wife doesn't even know I am getting retro and I won't tell her until the day it arrives in our account (or maybe not even then?).
we are 6 kts prior to V1 and we get a wheel well fire.
Do we try and stop it knowing we may not be able to cause the tires are blown or do we take it in the air with a known fire?
Its a tough spot to be in. Both answers are right it just depends on what you're willing to risk.
hoover is offline  
Old 11-01-2023, 04:35 AM
  #1473  
Furloughed Again?!
 
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: Boeing 737
Posts: 4,804
Default

Originally Posted by hoover
we are 6 kts prior to V1 and we get a wheel well fire.
Do we try and stop it knowing we may not be able to cause the tires are blown or do we take it in the air with a known fire?
Its a tough spot to be in. Both answers are right it just depends on what you're willing to risk.
I'm definitely not advocating for signing anything they push across the table, but there are risks in stretching out the timeline. A possible war in the Middle East with associated increases in fuel prices, and softening of domestic non-premium travel - the same thing that's hurting Spirit, Frontier, and JetBlue right now.

The airlines were doing pretty great right up to 9/11. At USAir we were still hiring 100 pilots a month. The fear of terrorism followed by the Iraq war slammed on the brakes and resulted in a breathtaking number of furloughs that lasted throughout the lost decade.

Regionals exploded for the first several years as mainline management took advantage of force majeur language to park older airplanes - DC9, F100, MD80, 737-200... and replace those good mainline jobs with thousands of poverty wage commuter jobs.... and then the commuter guys experienced their OWN lost decade as there was no hiring and no place to go at the majors who were not only inundated by furloughs, but who had just given away a sizable fraction of their flying to those very same regionals. And just when it looked like things might be getting better, they raised the retirement age to 65 resulting in even more stagnation.

Now to be fair, those mainline contracts would have been torn apart in bankruptcy whether they had force majeur language or not. But it was that language that USAir president Rakesh Gangwal said "opened certain doors to us that were unavailable before" allowing them to abrogate sections of the contract including, minimum fleet count, minimum Captain positions, minimum block hours, and the no furlough clause.

Hopefully we will have a CBA and at least lock in the some of the scheduling and QOL improvements (harder for those to be changed in bankruptcy) before we are staring down the barrel of another lost decade.

Before you come after me with pitchforks and torches calling me names and whatnot, I'm not advocating for rolling over. This all seems so eerily similar to 9/11 you can hopefully understand why I'm nervous that we are going down that road again, My career has been littered with these multi year speed bumps and I am admittedly Chicken Little about the events that could potentially be leading us towards another one.

Last edited by ZapBrannigan; 11-01-2023 at 05:12 AM.
ZapBrannigan is offline  
Old 11-01-2023, 06:55 AM
  #1474  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 270
Default

Originally Posted by ZapBrannigan
I'm definitely not advocating for signing anything they push across the table, but there are risks in stretching out the timeline. A possible war in the Middle East with associated increases in fuel prices, and softening of domestic non-premium travel - the same thing that's hurting Spirit, Frontier, and JetBlue right now.

The airlines were doing pretty great right up to 9/11. At USAir we were still hiring 100 pilots a month. The fear of terrorism followed by the Iraq war slammed on the brakes and resulted in a breathtaking number of furloughs that lasted throughout the lost decade.

Regionals exploded for the first several years as mainline management took advantage of force majeur language to park older airplanes - DC9, F100, MD80, 737-200... and replace those good mainline jobs with thousands of poverty wage commuter jobs.... and then the commuter guys experienced their OWN lost decade as there was no hiring and no place to go at the majors who were not only inundated by furloughs, but who had just given away a sizable fraction of their flying to those very same regionals. And just when it looked like things might be getting better, they raised the retirement age to 65 resulting in even more stagnation.

Now to be fair, those mainline contracts would have been torn apart in bankruptcy whether they had force majeur language or not. But it was that language that USAir president Rakesh Gangwal said "opened certain doors to us that were unavailable before" allowing them to abrogate sections of the contract including, minimum fleet count, minimum Captain positions, minimum block hours, and the no furlough clause.

Hopefully we will have a CBA and at least lock in the some of the scheduling and QOL improvements (harder for those to be changed in bankruptcy) before we are staring down the barrel of another lost decade.

Before you come after me with pitchforks and torches calling me names and whatnot, I'm not advocating for rolling over. This all seems so eerily similar to 9/11 you can hopefully understand why I'm nervous that we are going down that road again, My career has been littered with these multi year speed bumps and I am admittedly Chicken Little about the events that could potentially be leading us towards another one.
Preach it brother
jetset is offline  
Old 11-01-2023, 07:02 AM
  #1475  
gets time off
 
mulcher's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,249
Default

Originally Posted by ZapBrannigan
I'm definitely not advocating for signing anything they push across the table, but there are risks in stretching out the timeline. A possible war in the Middle East with associated increases in fuel prices, and softening of domestic non-premium travel - the same thing that's hurting Spirit, Frontier, and JetBlue right now.

The airlines were doing pretty great right up to 9/11. At USAir we were still hiring 100 pilots a month. The fear of terrorism followed by the Iraq war slammed on the brakes and resulted in a breathtaking number of furloughs that lasted throughout the lost decade.

Regionals exploded for the first several years as mainline management took advantage of force majeur language to park older airplanes - DC9, F100, MD80, 737-200... and replace those good mainline jobs with thousands of poverty wage commuter jobs.... and then the commuter guys experienced their OWN lost decade as there was no hiring and no place to go at the majors who were not only inundated by furloughs, but who had just given away a sizable fraction of their flying to those very same regionals. And just when it looked like things might be getting better, they raised the retirement age to 65 resulting in even more stagnation.

Now to be fair, those mainline contracts would have been torn apart in bankruptcy whether they had force majeur language or not. But it was that language that USAir president Rakesh Gangwal said "opened certain doors to us that were unavailable before" allowing them to abrogate sections of the contract including, minimum fleet count, minimum Captain positions, minimum block hours, and the no furlough clause.

Hopefully we will have a CBA and at least lock in the some of the scheduling and QOL improvements (harder for those to be changed in bankruptcy) before we are staring down the barrel of another lost decade.

Before you come after me with pitchforks and torches calling me names and whatnot, I'm not advocating for rolling over. This all seems so eerily similar to 9/11 you can hopefully understand why I'm nervous that we are going down that road again, My career has been littered with these multi year speed bumps and I am admittedly Chicken Little about the events that could potentially be leading us towards another one.
Well this just proves the point we need to get it right now and not wait for them to send a turd TA1. Yet you tell people like me to just relax be happy and vote no if we don’t like it. Yup we better get this first one right. Talk to reps and let them know.
mulcher is offline  
Old 11-01-2023, 03:53 PM
  #1476  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,831
Default

Originally Posted by ZapBrannigan
I'm definitely not advocating for signing anything they push across the table, but there are risks in stretching out the timeline. A possible war in the Middle East with associated increases in fuel prices, and softening of domestic non-premium travel - the same thing that's hurting Spirit, Frontier, and JetBlue right now.

The airlines were doing pretty great right up to 9/11. At USAir we were still hiring 100 pilots a month. The fear of terrorism followed by the Iraq war slammed on the brakes and resulted in a breathtaking number of furloughs that lasted throughout the lost decade.

Regionals exploded for the first several years as mainline management took advantage of force majeur language to park older airplanes - DC9, F100, MD80, 737-200... and replace those good mainline jobs with thousands of poverty wage commuter jobs.... and then the commuter guys experienced their OWN lost decade as there was no hiring and no place to go at the majors who were not only inundated by furloughs, but who had just given away a sizable fraction of their flying to those very same regionals. And just when it looked like things might be getting better, they raised the retirement age to 65 resulting in even more stagnation.

Now to be fair, those mainline contracts would have been torn apart in bankruptcy whether they had force majeur language or not. But it was that language that USAir president Rakesh Gangwal said "opened certain doors to us that were unavailable before" allowing them to abrogate sections of the contract including, minimum fleet count, minimum Captain positions, minimum block hours, and the no furlough clause.

Hopefully we will have a CBA and at least lock in the some of the scheduling and QOL improvements (harder for those to be changed in bankruptcy) before we are staring down the barrel of another lost decade.

Before you come after me with pitchforks and torches calling me names and whatnot, I'm not advocating for rolling over. This all seems so eerily similar to 9/11 you can hopefully understand why I'm nervous that we are going down that road again, My career has been littered with these multi year speed bumps and I am admittedly Chicken Little about the events that could potentially be leading us towards another one.
Word! You’re not being Chicken Little or rolling over. You’re simply factoring possible future scenarios and that’s something that everyone should do.

Wholeheartedly we need to get this first one right!

🔥👇
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Old 11-01-2023, 05:35 PM
  #1477  
Furloughed Again?!
 
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: Boeing 737
Posts: 4,804
Default

Delta is leading the industry, and not in a good way. It's always quicker and easier to furlough the non-union employees first. Canary in the coal mine.

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/11/01/delta-l
ZapBrannigan is offline  
Old 11-01-2023, 06:05 PM
  #1478  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 647
Default

Originally Posted by ZapBrannigan
Delta is leading the industry, and not in a good way. It's always quicker and easier to furlough the non-union employees first. Canary in the coal mine.

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/11/01/delta-l
Paywall...
MudhammedCJ is offline  
Old 11-01-2023, 06:37 PM
  #1479  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MatthewAMEL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 758
Default

Originally Posted by MudhammedCJ
Paywall...
Not a paywall...the link was just truncated.

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/11/01/delt...cut-costs.html
MatthewAMEL is offline  
Old 11-01-2023, 06:39 PM
  #1480  
Furloughed Again?!
 
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: Boeing 737
Posts: 4,804
Default

Originally Posted by MatthewAMEL
Not a paywall...the link was just truncated.

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/11/01/delt...cut-costs.html
whoops. Thanks for finding and fixing it.
ZapBrannigan is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 07:59 AM
cargofast
FedEx
60
09-04-2021 05:47 PM
Southerner
Major
264
02-07-2013 07:28 PM
deltabound
Foreign
18
03-28-2010 03:49 PM
tomderekc
Flight Schools and Training
25
11-14-2009 04:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices