Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
1,221 Reasons Not to work for Southwest >

1,221 Reasons Not to work for Southwest

Search

Notices

1,221 Reasons Not to work for Southwest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-05-2023, 10:04 PM
  #1401  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,794
Default

Originally Posted by hoover
all of your scenarios can happen without co terminals but now they start with a DH from another base that you can waive and get paid for. Under the co terminals you no longer get this. That's why people are against it.
also saying we need it to grow the base is not a good argument. Itll once again be maxed out very shortly.
Two sides to that argument. In your example, you'll further stagnate the bases in those metropolitan areas in favor of other bases that aren't tapped out like those 3. By stagnate, I mean everything from the number of lines to ELITT and open time opportunities using their seniority vs. bidding for trips with DH's to would-be co-terminals from other bases and likely needing to do it at straight because out-of-base seniority. You're penalizing people in those bases.

I think we've all beat this one to death and I think everyone has their opinions on it and its probably not going to change.
as another data point I havent spoke with anyone who's for this, however, I man not in one of the affected bases.
Poor language would change my opinion.

this sick leave/accrual is what's going to lead us to strike or a failed TA1.
Remember it was polled if we were willing to give up sick for xx. I could see the NC trying to find a balance in this to get the deal done. That would also be a concession to me.
Yep. Nonstarter.
RJSAviator76 is offline  
Old 10-06-2023, 01:57 PM
  #1402  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2021
Position: I fly airplanes
Posts: 73
Default

Originally Posted by hoover
this sick leave/accrual is what's going to lead us to strike or a failed TA1.
Remember it was polled if we were willing to give up sick for xx. I could see the NC trying to find a balance in this to get the deal done. That would also be a concession to me.
Agree 100%. This is the hill worth dying on IMO and the issue we will park aircraft for. We need to get STD/LTD/LOL/life insurance/medical squared away without sacrificing sick bank accrual… no matter what. I also think this will be the hardest fought battle between the NC and SWA because of the astronomical costs involved. The kompany painted themselves in this corner, and it’s time to pay up.
Panthertamer79 is offline  
Old 10-06-2023, 02:20 PM
  #1403  
Furloughed Again?!
 
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: Boeing 737
Posts: 4,804
Default

Originally Posted by Panthertamer79
Agree 100%. This is the hill worth dying on IMO and the issue we will park aircraft for. We need to get STD/LTD/LOL/life insurance/medical squared away without sacrificing sick bank accrual… no matter what. I also think this will be the hardest fought battle between the NC and SWA because of the astronomical costs involved. The kompany painted themselves in this corner, and it’s time to pay up.
I agree regarding accrual rate. But IF we win a Cadillac STD/LTD plan, I'd be willing to allow them to buy down my sick bank and go forward with a lower maximum sick bank.

No point in hanging onto 1600 sick trips if you'll only ever burn 150 before being covered by STD/LTD. Throw in a few hundred more for personal time off.

Im not trying to give away the farm here. But have you ever tried to work out how long prior to retirement you would have to begin to call in sick, one 3 day a month, to get rid of 1600 sick trips? It's YEARS prior to retirement.

I'm really hoping for a quality LTD plan that includes continued contributions to my 401K until retirement.
ZapBrannigan is offline  
Old 10-06-2023, 02:24 PM
  #1404  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2021
Posts: 466
Default

Originally Posted by ZapBrannigan
I agree regarding accrual rate. But IF we win a Cadillac STD/LTD plan, I'd be willing to allow them to buy down my sick bank and go forward with a lower maximum sick bank.

No point in hanging onto 1600 sick trips if you'll only ever burn 150 before being covered by STD/LTD. Throw in a few hundred more for personal time off.

Im not trying to give away the farm here. But have you ever tried to work out how long prior to retirement you would have to begin to call in sick, one 3 day a month, to get rid of 1600 sick trips? It's YEARS prior to retirement.

I'm really hoping for a quality LTD plan that includes continued contributions to my 401K until retirement.


Yeah, this. SMH at those who will vote NO over not keeping a cadillac sick bank while also demanding a cadillac STD/LTD plan. This is one of those you should not have both ways. The company should offer some sort of % buyback to the currently accrued sick hours each pilot has over X hours. There is absolutely no need to have 1600 hrs of sick bank when STD/LTD would kick in after X weeks.
golfandflows is offline  
Old 10-06-2023, 03:07 PM
  #1405  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Grumpyaviator's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,030
Default

Originally Posted by golfandflows
Yeah, this. SMH at those who will vote NO over not keeping a cadillac sick bank while also demanding a cadillac STD/LTD plan. This is one of those you should not have both ways. The company should offer some sort of % buyback to the currently accrued sick hours each pilot has over X hours. There is absolutely no need to have 1600 hrs of sick bank when STD/LTD would kick in after X weeks.
I don’t know how many are in my position, but after LTD last year I basically have no sick bank, so preserving what I don’t have isn’t that important to me.

But, the company built this house of accruing massive sick time to avoid providing a retirement sick plan and now it’s backfired.

We need a plan that if you have back-to-back disabilities you don’t suffer financially the second time because you had to burn your sick time on the first round (not having been here long enough to build up many years’ worth) as well as a plan that covers us going into retirement. As was already mentioned, if there’s a Cadillac plan that makes 1600 tfp irrelevant the whole concept deserves rethinking.

Again, once you go on LTD they let
you know under no uncertain terms you’re no longer an employee in good standing.

Pilot QOL does not benefit the company.

My vote is NO
Grumpyaviator is offline  
Old 10-06-2023, 06:43 PM
  #1406  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MatthewAMEL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 758
Default

Originally Posted by Grumpyaviator
My vote is NO
We get it. You are voting 'No' no matter what the TA says. So why bother with any other part of your post?
MatthewAMEL is offline  
Old 10-06-2023, 10:17 PM
  #1407  
At your mom's house
 
hoover's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: cpt 737
Posts: 2,832
Default

Originally Posted by MatthewAMEL
We get it. You are voting 'No' no matter what the TA says. So why bother with any other part of your post?
maybe to share opinions? I talk with coworkers in and out of the cockpit. Sometimes I say something they haven't thought of sometimes they enlighten me.
The more information the better
hoover is offline  
Old 10-07-2023, 02:18 AM
  #1408  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Mozam's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Position: Left
Posts: 1,275
Default u

Originally Posted by Grumpyaviator
I don’t know how many are in my position, but after LTD last year I basically have no sick bank, so preserving what I don’t have isn’t that important to me.

But, the company built this house of accruing massive sick time to avoid providing a retirement sick plan and now it’s backfired.

We need a plan that if you have back-to-back disabilities you don’t suffer financially the second time because you had to burn your sick time on the first round (not having been here long enough to build up many years’ worth) as well as a plan that covers us going into retirement. As was already mentioned, if there’s a Cadillac plan that makes 1600 tfp irrelevant the whole concept deserves rethinking.

Again, once you go on LTD they let
you know under no uncertain terms you’re no longer an employee in good standing.

Pilot QOL does not benefit the company.

My vote is NO

Go out on medical this place considers you non productive and kicks you and your family to the curb. I have seen many younger pilots here have a medical injury or accident and the company will not give them the time of day. No benefits , no passes, no LUV.

Just remember, anyone can fall off a ladder or get in an auto accident.
Mozam is offline  
Old 10-07-2023, 03:27 AM
  #1409  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,189
Default

Originally Posted by Caveman
This is a huge concession, that is being sold as a gain.

Line construction, where pairings start/end, line quality, seniority, open time, reserves, parking, ground transportation, hotels are just a few of the contractual areas a coterminal touches. Have you fleshed all these topics out for your in domicile and commuting pilot brethren? How about those SWAPA officials who've already gone on a social media roadshow selling this so hard already, have they really flushed out all the unintended consequences in the last 10 days of this new concept?

The company's growth plans and what they are constrained by, isn't the current pilot contract. Nothing in our current contract keeps them from building IAH or DFW lines of flying snd putting them in the bid package. They just don't want to pay for the trans/hotels, paid moves or dhs needed that our current contract would require.

Hence, we need to make a CONCESSION to enable it.

All of this, guilded in EXPLOSIVE GROWTH gold, and lots of us are biting off on the shiny flashy, without having gone through the necessary critical thought, of the long term unintended consequences of such.

Why even consider a single concessionary topic in this contract?

just say NO to concessions!

.
Profane Kahuna is offline  
Old 10-07-2023, 04:09 AM
  #1410  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Grumpyaviator's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,030
Default

Originally Posted by MatthewAMEL
We get it. You are voting 'No' no matter what the TA says. So why bother with any other part of your post?

My vote is NO
Grumpyaviator is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 07:59 AM
cargofast
FedEx
60
09-04-2021 05:47 PM
Southerner
Major
264
02-07-2013 07:28 PM
deltabound
Foreign
18
03-28-2010 03:49 PM
tomderekc
Flight Schools and Training
25
11-14-2009 04:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices