Contract Expectations
#81
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,264
#83
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 290
Yes, we agree.
But this discussion is not about Carl.
The question was do we get mad when regionals get big pay raises?
I say rejoice! Good for them. The price for an hour of time at the career destination airlines just went up. Thank you regional pilots for fighting the good fight!
.
But this discussion is not about Carl.
The question was do we get mad when regionals get big pay raises?
I say rejoice! Good for them. The price for an hour of time at the career destination airlines just went up. Thank you regional pilots for fighting the good fight!
.
#84
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,264
This is not about saying the regionals shouldn't get the pay raises. They absolutely should. Its about time that they are accurately compensated for their skill and responsibility. This is all about saying that if this is their price, its maddening to be working for less. We should be getting much much more. I am hoping I am not disappointed with what they bring in an offer.
This game is a lot like nuclear deterrence. To have a credible nuclear deterrent threat that keeps the peace we need to have a massive nuclear arsenal that is fully operational at all times and has the ability to annihilate the other side at a moment's notice. Peace through strength, right? 99.99% of pilots believe that when it comes to national defense. But, when it comes down to it, probably less than 50% of pilots believe in that principle when it comes to preserving the well-being of ourselves, our families, and our profession.
If we all are not willing to pose the credible existential threat to the other side (management) in our negotiations, then we lose. The company walks all over us, as they are currently doing. They do not feel a credible existential threat to their existence. They see the weakness in us. The way we are being treated right now is what we get for being weak both right now in this contract cycle (for example, we filed for mediation at least a year later than we should have) and last contract cycle when we ratified TA2 with a value more than a billion dollars less than The Platform that every member of the BOD signed a letter saying they wouldn't settle for less than.
If you were a corporate executive, you would also take advantage of the weakness exhibited by our pilots in order to return maximum value to your investors and shareholders. That's capitalism.
Most pilots seem to believe in capitalism. Except when it comes to their relationship with their employer. Then, it seems like most pilots believe in a form of socialism: give to the company. Do not claim ownership of our share of the economic success of the corporation.
Bottom line, if you want "much, more more." learn the RLA. That's where our leverage is. You can learn it on your own. You don't need SWAPA to teach you. Just start Googling. A great starting point is John Livingood's RLA site. Read all of the pages there. There are quite a few of them (click the "RLA Nuances" button).
With the RLA, like Delta is doing right now (and has been doing since they filed for mediation in January of 2020), we can leverage the company into acceding to our contractual demands. If you're going to passively wait and see what offer SWAPA will bring you, you will be disappointed. Unfortunately, that is what most pilots do. And even more unfortunately, we will likely get a contract that reflects their lack of commitment. Now is the time to get very, very involved if you want "much, much more."
#86
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,264
And I'm definitely also holding out for the ability to charge the company for my time spent (at my seat position and longevity) for having to deal with rejected health insurance claims ... among a boatload of other pay, work rule, hotel, retirement, ancillary, and other items.
Minimum 55% DOS pay rate raise to bring us up to inflation-adjusted parity with UAL year 2000 large 737 rates plus additional raise to reflect the fact that a 55% raise would mean that, in real terms, we hadn't received any raise at all in greater than 20 years.
Paid tail swaps, double for unplanned tail swaps.
Premium for the rest of the trip following a short overnight (<14 hours). Premium for a long (>10 hrs) duty day for the entire day.
No more JA's. JA's filled by reverse Dutch auction system where the pay is raised on each round of bidding for a trip until a taker is found or the trip cancels. Bidding starts at 2x fully rigged rate for trip (ie, one one-hour leg pays 13)
Minimum 25% NEC.
Retiree medical coverage.
Separate hotels from FA's. SWAPA in charge of Pillot CAB, which we'll now call "PAB.". Duty time starts early if van has to leave hotel unreasonably early. Can't stay at less than a 4-star property. Must have healthy food (not fast food, not gas station, not Chili's or Applebees or similar) within a 10-minute Google Maps walk of property. Must have full-size gym access at hotel or within 10-minute Google Maps walk of hotel with no charge for one-day pass to work out for the day. Typical hotel gym doesn't qualify as full-size gym. Must be in a low crime area. Hotel must have been built in last 10 years or newly renovated in last 10 years.
DHR ratio increased to >= .91.
Claw back of sick time accrual for premium trips at premium rates.
Premium for entire day when over four legs in a duty day.
Ability for captains to avoidance bid FO's.
If I discover a pay error, I receive double the amount of the error.
Last edited by Lewbronski; 12-01-2022 at 01:21 AM.
#88
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 231
I got similar comments from the left seat. I tried to tell them that thing could carry 140 pax from ISP to BUR nonstop without runway issues on either end, but they still thought it was an RJ and nothing I said was going to change their minds.
The absolute WORST comment I got though was from a former single seat fighter pilot who said that military pilots shouldn’t have to fly the “RJ” and should be given some kind of superseniority when hired and fly the 737 - out of seniority if necessary - if we got that type. He was serious!! WTF?!
The same guy asked what would happen if an A220 FO wanted to upgrade to 737 captain with no 737 experience.
I was like… “uh…he bids it, he is awarded it, and he goes to school?”
He told me that couldn’t happen. You had to be a 737 copilot before you could upgrade on a 737.
I attempted to reason with him by explaining that at the legacies there are lots of times when an FO might never have flown a type before upgrading to Captain on it. He told me I was wrong and that couldn’t happen. Mind you this is the one and only airline he has ever worked for and has apparently never had communication with a pilot from any other airline…? 🙄
The absolute WORST comment I got though was from a former single seat fighter pilot who said that military pilots shouldn’t have to fly the “RJ” and should be given some kind of superseniority when hired and fly the 737 - out of seniority if necessary - if we got that type. He was serious!! WTF?!
The same guy asked what would happen if an A220 FO wanted to upgrade to 737 captain with no 737 experience.
I was like… “uh…he bids it, he is awarded it, and he goes to school?”
He told me that couldn’t happen. You had to be a 737 copilot before you could upgrade on a 737.
I attempted to reason with him by explaining that at the legacies there are lots of times when an FO might never have flown a type before upgrading to Captain on it. He told me I was wrong and that couldn’t happen. Mind you this is the one and only airline he has ever worked for and has apparently never had communication with a pilot from any other airline…? 🙄
#89
Moderator
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Position: MEC Chairman, Snack Basket Committee
Posts: 3,199
#90
I’m not trying to sound anti military. I honestly believe that classes in airline history and airline labor relations should be required prior to attending Indoc at any major airline. As a profession we need to do a better job of learning from our collective history. Those would benefit ANYONE who is new to the profession regardless of their background. The reality is that the generation who lived through turboprops, pay for training, Gulfstream international type schemes (pay to sit in the right seat), B scales, is getting old. The young folks joining the company now may have taken their first flying lessons POST 9/11!!! They may never have flown anything with steam gauges. They may never have flown an airliner without an autopilot or FMS. They may not know the history of the RJ and why it was so damaging to our profession.
Airline pilots do a poor job of indoctrinating our young because we just assume they did the same thing to get here that we did. Well, it should come as no surprise that none of our new hires these days flew cancelled checks in clapped out Barons in the middle of the night. Times change and with them so do perceptions. We all view this job through the lens of our own past experience. We have to figure out a way to share that history with our new hires without sounding like we’re preaching to them about the glory days.
Airline pilots do a poor job of indoctrinating our young because we just assume they did the same thing to get here that we did. Well, it should come as no surprise that none of our new hires these days flew cancelled checks in clapped out Barons in the middle of the night. Times change and with them so do perceptions. We all view this job through the lens of our own past experience. We have to figure out a way to share that history with our new hires without sounding like we’re preaching to them about the glory days.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post