Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
What’s next for southwest ? >

What’s next for southwest ?

Search

Notices

What’s next for southwest ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-12-2022, 11:37 AM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CA1900's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 843
Default

Originally Posted by at6d
I’ve had several long distance trips in a 787 as a passenger. Nice airplane. As for SWA, where the hell are we going to go with one? We are going to offer three cabin service? With meals?
Catering by Dickey's.
CA1900 is offline  
Old 06-12-2022, 12:53 PM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 989
Default

Originally Posted by avi8er
It’s all just noise to drown out what’s really important. Contract 2020.

Bingo. Now is no time to get distracted. Watching what the Regionals are willing to pay to keep people ought to give you a good idea of the market value of a year one pilot. Adjust accordingly for longevity and inflation.
Zard is offline  
Old 06-12-2022, 01:57 PM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,803
Default

Originally Posted by hercretired
strong rumor of Airbus 320/321 coming to fleet. apparently new management thinks "price is right" and is "laser focused on cost control" - every ULCC, LCC in the world is using the Airbus.

"why not the Airbus" was asked, and met with silence, at a recent HQ meeting. "show me the data, why not" - crickets in the room
Its no secret that Watterson (and apparently management) is/was really impressed with the A321 NEO. Now THAT airplane would really make sense especially in the LR or XLR variant.
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Old 06-12-2022, 02:22 PM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Mozam's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Position: Left
Posts: 1,260
Default

Originally Posted by at6d
I’ve had several long distance trips in a 787 as a passenger. Nice airplane. As for SWA, where the hell are we going to go with one? We are going to offer three cabin service? With meals?

All coach. SAT-DAL-HOU. Triangle. .
Mozam is offline  
Old 06-12-2022, 02:40 PM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CA1900's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 843
Default

Originally Posted by Mozam
All coach. SAT-DAL-HOU. Triangle. .
I just came across some video of the proposed 20-minute 787 turns:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xG-meaGqg-M


Ops agent in yellow, removing a jump seater at 1:38 for weight.
CA1900 is offline  
Old 06-12-2022, 02:50 PM
  #86  
At your mom's house
 
hoover's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: cpt 737
Posts: 2,798
Default

Originally Posted by hercretired
strong rumor of Airbus 320/321 coming to fleet. apparently new management thinks "price is right" and is "laser focused on cost control" - every ULCC, LCC in the world is using the Airbus.

"why not the Airbus" was asked, and met with silence, at a recent HQ meeting. "show me the data, why not" - crickets in the room
I'm not sure of the backorder for the neo XLR but in would think it's a good idea to evaluate since Boeing may not be making commercial jets in the near future since they've dicked up the max variants so much.
we've have to hire lighter FAs for the tray table tho
hoover is offline  
Old 06-12-2022, 02:55 PM
  #87  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,776
Default

This mental masturbation over 787 or Airbus is absolutely comical. I'll believe it when the vacancy bid awards are posted. Until then, I'll happily fly this heap of 1965 technology for the highest dollar possible.
RJSAviator76 is offline  
Old 06-12-2022, 03:09 PM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,153
Default

Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
Its no secret that Watterson (and apparently management) is/was really impressed with the A321 NEO. Now THAT airplane would really make sense especially in the LR or XLR variant.
As long as you don't spend much time over high mountains and never need to go over FL 340, the 321 is great. Tiny wing, no stall margin at high cruise. Study up on mountainous terrain safe escape routing procedures.
flensr is offline  
Old 06-12-2022, 03:16 PM
  #89  
Gets Weekends Off
 
saab2000's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,750
Default

Originally Posted by RJSAviator76
This mental masturbation over 787 or Airbus is absolutely comical. I'll believe it when the vacancy bid awards are posted. Until then, I'll happily fly this heap of 1965 technology for the highest dollar possible.
Correct. Most have been around long enough (in the industry) to believe nothing until they’re sitting in it with their name on the release. Everything else is background noise.

MDW-GRR proving runs for the 787.

Originally Posted by flensr
As long as you don't spend much time over high mountains and never need to go over FL 340, the 321 is great. Tiny wing, no stall margin at high cruise. Study up on mountainous terrain safe escape routing procedures.
I assume staying lower gives a wider margin? How is the Airbus auto thrust system in moderate mountain wave? Honest question because I don’t know.
​​​​​​​
saab2000 is offline  
Old 06-12-2022, 03:28 PM
  #90  
Furloughed Again?!
 
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: Boeing 737
Posts: 4,804
Default

Originally Posted by flensr
As long as you don't spend much time over high mountains and never need to go over FL 340, the 321 is great. Tiny wing, no stall margin at high cruise. Study up on mountainous terrain safe escape routing procedures.
I’ve never flown one with “sharklets” (French for winglet) but I hear they completely change the wing for the better.
ZapBrannigan is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
H60 DUSTOFF
JetBlue
1590
07-01-2022 03:10 PM
Halon1211
Spirit
252
03-03-2022 02:31 PM
Lewbronski
Southwest
3
02-27-2022 09:20 AM
Greensideup
Air Wisconsin
10
01-03-2019 02:49 PM
Derian
Corporate
10
09-22-2018 01:30 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices