Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
All WARN notices rescinded >

All WARN notices rescinded

Search

Notices

All WARN notices rescinded

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-03-2021, 02:01 PM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,803
Default

Originally Posted by bay982
That’s the ‘unforgivable’ part that just feels like a bummer, so many pilots here saying that the culture is dead forever. SWA seemed like a more pleasant place to work because people believed in being positive and treating coworkers well, which, admittedly takes effort.

SWA undoubtedly screwed up furlough and concessions discussions. That sucks. It created a lot of worry when it was least needed. My only point is that at the end, unlike many others, they didn’t furlough & they didn’t force pay concessions.
You can’t “force” pay concessions on a contract employee group unless there is a force majeure clause in said contract. Ya see how their past actions are all tying in together?
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Old 01-03-2021, 03:27 PM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 659
Default

Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
You can’t “force” pay concessions on a contract employee group unless there is a force majeure clause in said contract. Ya see how their past actions are all tying in together?
Worth repeating. Only way they could “force” concessions is through a FM clause or bankruptcy.
Peacock is offline  
Old 01-03-2021, 07:38 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 137
Default

Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
You can’t “force” pay concessions on a contract employee group unless there is a force majeure clause in said contract. Ya see how their past actions are all tying in together?
Ok, instead of ‘force’ is it better to say that SWA didn’t involuntary come to a union agreement to reduce monthly guarantee hours as did UA and DL?

Hopefully my point is clear. As unpleasant as the threat of furloughs and pay cuts is, it is distinctly better than actual furloughs and pay cuts.
bay982 is offline  
Old 01-03-2021, 08:12 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 659
Default

Originally Posted by bay982
Ok, instead of ‘force’ is it better to say that SWA didn’t involuntary come to a union agreement to reduce monthly guarantee hours as did UA and DL?

Hopefully my point is clear. As unpleasant as the threat of furloughs and pay cuts is, it is distinctly better than actual furloughs and pay cuts.
Didn't Delta and United vote?
Peacock is offline  
Old 01-03-2021, 08:27 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,264
Default

Originally Posted by bay982
Ok, instead of ‘force’ is it better to say that SWA didn’t involuntary come to a union agreement to reduce monthly guarantee hours as did UA and DL?

Hopefully my point is clear. As unpleasant as the threat of furloughs and pay cuts is, it is distinctly better than actual furloughs and pay cuts.
Yes, threatened furloughs, pay cuts, and contract-gutting are better than the actual versions.

However, it’s the government aid, not the company’s benevolence, that precluded the company from continuing to press forward with their attempts to turn their threats into reality. DO NOT FORGET.
Lewbronski is offline  
Old 01-04-2021, 07:03 AM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 291
Default

Mr K said they would do everything they could to avoid furloughs. They started the downturn with 4 billion in cash. At the end of the 3rd quarter they had spent 503 million of their own money and taken on lots of debt to bring the cash pile up to 12-14 billion. Then they said they would furlough. For what? An extra month or so of burn money and that would’ve been from the 10%. Furloughs would have had less of a yield. This when there was 4-5 years in the bank at the current burn rate. what did Mr K say again - “we will do all we can to avoid furloughs?”

So, I plan to stay here, and I don’t want to be angry the rest of my career. But I will remember. And I’m angry now. However, At the end of the day it is still a good job and it is fun even in pandemic times (but only in small doses). But I will never trust what Mr K says. He is all business that sees cost period. Nothing else. Everything about culture etc. that he professes is just fake. But the people of SWA still have some culture and some people still remember Herb. And I still want to fly with those people and I still would rather be one of those people when I’m 65 rather than a crotchety old pilot that spends the entire turn complaining. But for now, I’m still ****ed.

Last edited by usernamehere; 01-04-2021 at 07:33 AM.
usernamehere is offline  
Old 01-04-2021, 08:26 AM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2020
Posts: 128
Default

Originally Posted by usernamehere
Mr K said they would do everything they could to avoid furloughs. They started the downturn with 4 billion in cash. At the end of the 3rd quarter they had spent 503 million of their own money and taken on lots of debt to bring the cash pile up to 12-14 billion. Then they said they would furlough. For what? An extra month or so of burn money and that would’ve been from the 10%. Furloughs would have had less of a yield. This when there was 4-5 years in the bank at the current burn rate. what did Mr K say again - “we will do all we can to avoid furloughs?”

So, I plan to stay here, and I don’t want to be angry the rest of my career. But I will remember. And I’m angry now. However, At the end of the day it is still a good job and it is fun even in pandemic times (but only in small doses). But I will never trust what Mr K says. He is all business that sees cost period. Nothing else. Everything about culture etc. that he professes is just fake. But the people of SWA still have some culture and some people still remember Herb. And I still want to fly with those people and I still would rather be one of those people when I’m 65 rather than a crotchety old pilot that spends the entire turn complaining. But for now, I’m still ****ed.

I feel the same way. I have found the WARN letter can be shrunk down and laminated and it will fit nicely in the blank screen of the MAX PFD. It will serve as a reminder to me to constantly be aware of what GK thinks of me. I have a larger version laminated and folded into a triangle for classroom training as my name plate.

Let this be known though, I don’t begrudge what he did as much as how he did it. Nothing like your kids reading about your loss of a job online right before Christmas...

It’s a job...nothing more.
LUVisLost is offline  
Old 01-04-2021, 08:44 AM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,264
Default

Originally Posted by usernamehere
Mr K said they would do everything they could to avoid furloughs. They started the downturn with 4 billion in cash. At the end of the 3rd quarter they had spent 503 million of their own money and taken on lots of debt to bring the cash pile up to 12-14 billion. Then they said they would furlough. For what? An extra month or so of burn money and that would’ve been from the 10%. Furloughs would have had less of a yield. This when there was 4-5 years in the bank at the current burn rate. what did Mr K say again - “we will do all we can to avoid furloughs?”

So, I plan to stay here, and I don’t want to be angry the rest of my career. But I will remember. And I’m angry now. However, At the end of the day it is still a good job and it is fun even in pandemic times (but only in small doses). But I will never trust what Mr K says. He is all business that sees cost period. Nothing else. Everything about culture etc. that he professes is just fake. But the people of SWA still have some culture and some people still remember Herb. And I still want to fly with those people and I still would rather be one of those people when I’m 65 rather than a crotchety old pilot that spends the entire turn complaining. But for now, I’m still ****ed.
Well said. The only difference is I’m not angry. Being angry with the company is like being mad at a thunderstorm up ahead of me on my route. A thunderstorm just does what it does. If I insist on flying into a thunderstorm and a FA gets injured or the jet gets damaged, my fellow pilot and I have only ourselves to blame and be angry with for flying into the thunderstorm when we could have deviated around it. Hopefully, I’ll never forget to deviate around a thunderstorm.
Lewbronski is offline  
Old 01-04-2021, 06:21 PM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2019
Posts: 791
Default

Having lived through it, most of you will forget this affront to your sensibility's in the next 6 months to a year. You will have forgotten it by the time you vote on your next contract. Hopefully a “remnant” will not. It will take years for that “remnant”to find its voice and a few more years to rise up. Hopefully the “remnant” will lead your group away from the management-centric in house union and find its footing with ALPA. ALPA is not magic but it puts a comfortable wall between you and your airline executives. It is helpful to move away from whats good for SWA pilots and at least have a connection to what is good for other pilots.
Good luck either way it goes..
9mikemike is offline  
Old 01-04-2021, 06:45 PM
  #70  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,776
Default

Originally Posted by 9mikemike
Having lived through it, most of you will forget this affront to your sensibility's in the next 6 months to a year. You will have forgotten it by the time you vote on your next contract. Hopefully a “remnant” will not. It will take years for that “remnant”to find its voice and a few more years to rise up. Hopefully the “remnant” will lead your group away from the management-centric in house union and find its footing with ALPA. ALPA is not magic but it puts a comfortable wall between you and your airline executives. It is helpful to move away from whats good for SWA pilots and at least have a connection to what is good for other pilots.
Good luck either way it goes..

I wouldn’t exactly call SWAPA 2.0 a “management-centric in-house union.” At least not since 2016.

Also, do we get some super slick, hardcore, heavily-mustached negotiators that will suddenly make GK quiver in his boots?

You’re also forgetting that many of us belonged to ALPA and not just at regionals. In short, if we were to ever have a vote to allow those mustached heroes on our property, I would only hope there would be some profanity-prefaced NO vote options and not just NO. Somehow, a simple NO wouldn’t quite cut it.

Last edited by RJSAviator76; 01-04-2021 at 07:04 PM.
RJSAviator76 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
propellere
Mesa Airlines
1742
12-24-2020 07:42 PM
Lewbronski
Southwest
44
11-10-2020 06:59 AM
Duct Mon
Frontier
1175
10-23-2020 06:35 AM
ComairFO
Regional
146
07-21-2008 09:09 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices