Upgrade times in the future?
#91
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 833
Possible...I'd still wager that those living east of Denver won't desire a 4 hr commute to sit rsv to fly uncommutable ETOPS trips for a minimum of 6 months. So those guys will continue to bypass until they can hold a closer commute or not have to be on reserve. Once we get to the end of the 2008 hires, the upgrade will drop 2 yrs overnight.
I predict the FO side in LAX will be a complete cluster******* and the company will be asking SWAPA for help to keep it staffed without constant turnover. I don't think the company is budgeting to run every new hire though ETOPS training just to have them bid out after 1-2 months.
2019 will be interesting for sure.
#93
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 280
Yah we will see. I'm figuring that most that will take an early upgrade there are willing to move there and commit to 12-24 months, thus making upgrade in LAX 1-2 years earlier than any other base. How many pilots really need to commute to be junior captains? If premium comes back for FOs, not many as the 1000 bypasses prove.
I predict the FO side in LAX will be a complete cluster******* and the company will be asking SWAPA for help to keep it staffed without constant turnover. I don't think the company is budgeting to run every new hire though ETOPS training just to have them bid out after 1-2 months.
2019 will be interesting for sure.
I predict the FO side in LAX will be a complete cluster******* and the company will be asking SWAPA for help to keep it staffed without constant turnover. I don't think the company is budgeting to run every new hire though ETOPS training just to have them bid out after 1-2 months.
2019 will be interesting for sure.
#94
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 833
Premium? That’s not coming back to either seat. They are still planning to replace most of the F/O’s that are upgrading next year. I don’t see anything changing anytime soon on the Premium front, unless there is a one off polar vortex or some other similar event. The company has made it abundantly clear that it wants the manning model this way.
My thinking is that if the company truly wanted this level of manning, we would have seen way more upgrades, so that premium flying would be equally rare in either seat. However, what is happening is premium is still happening on the Captain side while the company carries all it's "extra" pilot as FOs. Look at the awards going into the holidays, lots of premium/VPF/JA for Captains, while the FO awards are a totally different picture. This tells us it's still cheaper to award premium and JA rather than carry more Captains and "kill" premium.
So why do we have so many FOs? If the company felt they didn't need all these pilots they could stop running classes at anytime. My guess is that they are taking a long term view and considering the training center capacity, ETOPS training/HI flying, future aircraft deliveries, and a possbile pilot shortage they plan to carry some extra pilots in the short term, but keep the extra pilots as FOs since overmanning costs more then premium.
#95
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,803
#96
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,153
#97
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 989
Shoots, brah!
#98
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,672
Upgrade times in the future?
Bingo!
I think these flights are going to be crewed by a lot of junior pilots in both seats and a lot of super senior stews.
Exception of course to existing OAK non commuters. No reason for those guys not to bid etops.
#99
weekends off? Nope...
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 2,021
If a picture is worth a thousand words, this one should help explain why 10 year upgrades should soon/hopefully be a thing of the past
Attachment 4083
Attachment 4083
Last edited by Smooth at FL450; 08-20-2023 at 04:48 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post