Search

Notices

TPIC rumor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-20-2017, 11:06 AM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MOGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: CRJ200; FO
Posts: 391
Default

Originally Posted by GatorHog
Wow.


Filler
I get the frustration though. It's a very good chance that if you are a civilian interviewing with a group of mil pilots, you'll get passed over for them. Even if you have thousand hours more and have beeen flying the lines for the past decade. No disrespect from me but it is discouraging sometimes.
MOGuy is offline  
Old 04-20-2017, 12:03 PM
  #72  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,776
Default

Classes are roughly half and half. This ain't FedEx or American.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RJSAviator76 is offline  
Old 04-20-2017, 12:06 PM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,670
Default TPIC rumor

Originally Posted by MOGuy
I get the frustration though. It's a very good chance that if you are a civilian interviewing with a group of mil pilots, you'll get passed over for them. Even if you have thousand hours more and have beeen flying the lines for the past decade. No disrespect from me but it is discouraging sometimes.


I mean the following with no disrespect or divisiveness:
Military hours do not equal civilian hours. You just can't equate the two. Your typical mil guy interviewing will have ten or more years of aviation experience in whatever they flew. They will have generally flown all around the world in some very challenging environments and made some life or death decisions at a very low experience level. They are officers in the military first and don't get the opportunity to fly as much as an airline pilot. That is why the disparity in hours between the two. One does not make a better pilot than another.
To rehash this argument is futile. Right now there is a pretty even split with some classes being more pure civilian than military. We will see how this plays out, but the reason they did away with this dumb requirement that nobody else has is to feed the hiring machine that is cranking up in full gear right now.
I am glad this is gone just like I am glad the type went away. Good riddance.
e6bpilot is offline  
Old 04-20-2017, 12:10 PM
  #74  
Working weekends
 
satpak77's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 2,384
Default

Call me retarded but I don't see any additional threat posed by the "military" applicants.

It is what is. Can't control what you can't control.

This may actually boost the chances of success for the 1000 Turbine PIC and 737 type holder, he now in theory should be at the very top of the stack.
satpak77 is offline  
Old 04-20-2017, 12:15 PM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MOGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: CRJ200; FO
Posts: 391
Default

Originally Posted by satpak77
Call me retarded but I don't see any additional threat posed by the "military" applicants.

It is what is. Can't control what you can't control.

This may actually boost the chances of success for the 1000 Turbine PIC and 737 type holder, he now in theory should be at the very top of the stack.
You are very correct. I don't think it's as big of a deal now but a few years ago the tides were different.
MOGuy is offline  
Old 04-20-2017, 12:45 PM
  #76  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: 175 CA
Posts: 1,544
Default

Originally Posted by e6bpilot
I mean the following with no disrespect or divisiveness:
Military hours do not equal civilian hours. You just can't equate the two. Your typical mil guy interviewing will have ten or more years of aviation experience in whatever they flew. They will have generally flown all around the world in some very challenging environments and made some life or death decisions at a very low experience level. They are officers in the military first and don't get the opportunity to fly as much as an airline pilot. That is why the disparity in hours between the two. One does not make a better pilot than another.
To rehash this argument is futile. Right now there is a pretty even split with some classes being more pure civilian than military. We will see how this plays out, but the reason they did away with this dumb requirement that nobody else has is to feed the hiring machine that is cranking up in full gear right now.
I am glad this is gone just like I am glad the type went away. Good riddance.
Completely playing devils advocate but military experience is also different from civilian in that they don't do departures, arrivals, shoot many approaches, deal with pax etc etc
Squallrider is offline  
Old 04-20-2017, 12:56 PM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: Cabin Temp Management Specialist
Posts: 277
Default

Originally Posted by Squallrider
Completely playing devils advocate but military experience is also different from civilian in that they don't do departures, arrivals, shoot many approaches, deal with pax etc etc
Oh boy. Here we go again ...
Jeff Lebowski is offline  
Old 04-20-2017, 01:13 PM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Chris99's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: B717 CA
Posts: 447
Default

Originally Posted by Squallrider
Completely playing devils advocate but military experience is also different from civilian in that they don't do departures, arrivals, shoot many approaches, deal with pax etc etc
Incorrect.

Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk
Chris99 is offline  
Old 04-20-2017, 01:23 PM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 139
Default

Originally Posted by Squallrider
Completely playing devils advocate but military experience is also different from civilian in that they don't do departures, arrivals, shoot many approaches, deal with pax etc etc
Are all those things supposed to be difficult? Challenging to execute with an airplane?
Warhawg01 is offline  
Old 04-20-2017, 01:24 PM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Position: pj's and coffee
Posts: 228
Default

Originally Posted by MOGuy
I get the frustration though. It's a very good chance that if you are a civilian interviewing with a group of mil pilots, you'll get passed over for them. Even if you have thousand hours more and have beeen flying the lines for the past decade. No disrespect from me but it is discouraging sometimes.
I get the frustration, too. My "wow" comment was more about the approach...like Zap said, no need to be so dramatic and divisive.

I had a good, respectful exchange with Whackmaster about this a short time ago. My position is that I don't think it makes sense that more civ guys with gobs of experience doing essentially the same job can't get hired. BUT, I don't think they should all just be hired instead of mil guys based on the type of flying and the number of hours, because that would discount the quality training, variety of experience, and responsibility inherent in military flying that airlines obviously value greatly. Both backgrounds are capable and both should be hired.

Originally Posted by MOGuy
It's a very good chance that if you are a civilian interviewing with a group of mil pilots, you'll get passed over for them.
This point, specifically, I disagree with, though. They don't have quotas. They can hire every person in every interview group if they all make the cut, and they've said as much. It's not a competition within the interview group. If someone didn't get hired it's because they screwed up, not because of the other people.
GatorHog is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Big E 757
Delta
71
06-23-2016 02:02 PM
JetRage
Atlas/Polar
60
10-16-2015 07:20 AM
Sunvox
United
14
11-16-2013 11:18 AM
IAHDFW
Cargo
101
02-12-2013 04:01 PM
Bengalsfan
Major
9
08-21-2005 07:09 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices