Skywest Flight Attendant Lawsuit
#11
(by the way, weak attempt at humor with the "ho(m)ework" comment.)
#12
Their argument is probably something along the lines of the "contract" was "negotiated" by a "representative" group which was organized and funded by the company, and therefore may not actually have the employees best interests at heart.
You can in theory make the same argument about SAPA, but I tend to think it's probably much more valid regarding the FA group.
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,256
#15
The previous rules were rationalized by national security/national interest, but twisted to the benefit of management. The RLA was a slight improvement on a bad thing which has it roots in the 1800's, well before airplanes existed.
The only reason unions don't try to abolish or amend RLA as it applies to airlines is because it's a big can of worms that everyone is afraid to open. You never know what sort of BS rules the airline coalition lobbyists might be able to buy off of congress. It could easily end up worse than it is now.
Is that a good reason to live with it? I don't know. Do you feel lucky, son?
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Posts: 613
Not sure how long the plaintiffs have worked there, but the rules have changed over time.
Their argument is probably something along the lines of the "contract" was "negotiated" by a "representative" group which was organized and funded by the company, and therefore may not actually have the employees best interests at heart.
You can in theory make the same argument about SAPA, but I tend to think it's probably much more valid regarding the FA group.
Their argument is probably something along the lines of the "contract" was "negotiated" by a "representative" group which was organized and funded by the company, and therefore may not actually have the employees best interests at heart.
You can in theory make the same argument about SAPA, but I tend to think it's probably much more valid regarding the FA group.
The theory of not having a union is that we can work together and share in the companies success without being obligated to align with a national organization that may not have the companies best interests in mind. The reality is that the company can just make changes to our "contract" without a pilot wide vote simply by getting SAPA to buy off on it. Block vs credit, EFB changes, allowing new hires to vote ect.... It would be interesting to see what happens with this. If a judge does side with the FA's, it pretty much will blow away any company rhetoric that the pilots have a true contract.
#19
If this gets legs and goes the distance, more than a few retired SKYW pilots will jump on the band wagon and pile on. The potential is very large, will be interesting. SKYW is unique in as much it's one of the few non-collectively bargained airlines out there. With 40+ years of union free operations, might backfire on them.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post