Skywest v2.0
#9171
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Lastly, complaining about the regional pilot union structure as a reason why not unionize while also refusing change it for the better is just another convenient excuse. I’ve said this to you at least three other times and you keep ignoring it but I’ll say it again, pilot unions at regionals are a lot more than just a contract. But you cling on to that and ignore everything else they do seemingly because it’s an excuse to not support unionizing.
Won't fix the industry.
Will cause a SLI at Inc.
Will lock in some rules, and likely prevent further QOL degradation (but the time to lock status quo was ten years ago... a lot more QOL back then. At this point it's slamming the barn door).
Won't keep the company from violating the contract.
Won't remove political games and self-interest from the pilot leadership group. Current leadership is largely pro-alpa, sapa by-laws just prevent them from being too vocal about it. Presumably they would run for MEC positions, presumably they would get elected.
![rickair7777 is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/clear.gif)
#9172
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2016
Posts: 443
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I don't not support unionizing, like I keep saying I voted yes. But I get frustrated with the "over-selling" of alpa at the regional level. Need to understand what it will do, and what it won't...
Won't fix the industry.
Will cause a SLI at Inc.
Will lock in some rules, and likely prevent further QOL degradation (but the time to lock status quo was ten years ago... a lot more QOL back then. At this point it's slamming the barn door).
Won't keep the company from violating the contract.
Won't remove political games and self-interest from the pilot leadership group. Current leadership is largely pro-alpa, sapa by-laws just prevent them from being too vocal about it. Presumably they would run for MEC positions, presumably they would get elected.
Won't fix the industry.
Will cause a SLI at Inc.
Will lock in some rules, and likely prevent further QOL degradation (but the time to lock status quo was ten years ago... a lot more QOL back then. At this point it's slamming the barn door).
Won't keep the company from violating the contract.
Won't remove political games and self-interest from the pilot leadership group. Current leadership is largely pro-alpa, sapa by-laws just prevent them from being too vocal about it. Presumably they would run for MEC positions, presumably they would get elected.
Only thing I have to add is that the difference when having a union is that the company would be legally violating the contract. Without we don’t even get that.
When times aren’t as good as they are now for pilots, inc can just throw the policy manual in the trash can and make new rules. Not that simple with a legally binding contract.
So like you said, it would lock in things like QOL..among other things.
![RemoveB4Flight is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#9173
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 118
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
You'd better be careful what you post here, brotha. It isn't hard for mainline recruiting to find out your identity. APC isn't as anonymous as you would like to believe. The tools for background checking at their disposal are beyond the realm of what you think is possible or even legal.
![Ace66 is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#9174
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
But if employers can match your user name to an email or user names on other websites, they might well identify you.
And yes, managers and HR lurk all of these forums.
Unless you're off probation at your career legacy, probably best to use a unique anonymous email and user ID for APC. Or be very careful what you say.
![rickair7777 is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#9177
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 324
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
scab
skab/Submit
noun
noun: scab; plural noun: scabs
1.
a dry, rough protective crust that forms over a cut or wound during healing.
2.
mange or a similar skin disease in animals.
any of a number of fungal diseases of plants in which rough patches develop, especially on apples and potatoes.
3.
informal
a person or thing regarded with dislike and disgust.
derogatory
a person who refuses to strike or to join a labor union or who takes over the job responsibilities of a striking worker.
By the way I'm right by definition you do not have to fly struck flying to be one you can also simply refuse to join a labor union. This would in fact be Skywest entire pilot group. Just quoting the definition in case any potential new hires wondered how they may be viewed by their peers.
skab/Submit
noun
noun: scab; plural noun: scabs
1.
a dry, rough protective crust that forms over a cut or wound during healing.
2.
mange or a similar skin disease in animals.
any of a number of fungal diseases of plants in which rough patches develop, especially on apples and potatoes.
3.
informal
a person or thing regarded with dislike and disgust.
derogatory
a person who refuses to strike or to join a labor union or who takes over the job responsibilities of a striking worker.
By the way I'm right by definition you do not have to fly struck flying to be one you can also simply refuse to join a labor union. This would in fact be Skywest entire pilot group. Just quoting the definition in case any potential new hires wondered how they may be viewed by their peers.
![MidnightHauler is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#9179
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 846
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I don't not support unionizing, like I keep saying I voted yes. But I get frustrated with the "over-selling" of alpa at the regional level. Need to understand what it will do, and what it won't...
Won't fix the industry.
Will cause a SLI at Inc.
Will lock in some rules, and likely prevent further QOL degradation (but the time to lock status quo was ten years ago... a lot more QOL back then. At this point it's slamming the barn door).
Won't keep the company from violating the contract.
Won't remove political games and self-interest from the pilot leadership group. Current leadership is largely pro-alpa, sapa by-laws just prevent them from being too vocal about it. Presumably they would run for MEC positions, presumably they would get elected.
Won't fix the industry.
Will cause a SLI at Inc.
Will lock in some rules, and likely prevent further QOL degradation (but the time to lock status quo was ten years ago... a lot more QOL back then. At this point it's slamming the barn door).
Won't keep the company from violating the contract.
Won't remove political games and self-interest from the pilot leadership group. Current leadership is largely pro-alpa, sapa by-laws just prevent them from being too vocal about it. Presumably they would run for MEC positions, presumably they would get elected.
Pilot unions, ALPA included, are not the magic bullet, even at mainline. It wasn’t too long ago when ALL legacies were in bankruptcy, forcing concessions, cancelling pensions, gutting work rules, etc. All those legacy pilots suffered despite their pilot unions. If you believe that you have to wait for pilot unions to have the power to prevent things that are not in their control, such as, recessions, terrorist attacks, pandemics, hostile or bad management, etc, that causes pilots to suffer, before you decide to unionize, then I submit you will never be in favor of unionizing.
As for the other things you mentioned, nothing forces an SLI other than a successful single carrier petition, which can theoretically happen today. Nothing prevents Skywest from reinterpreting, amending, or cancelling their policy manual. They can do any of that right now if they wanted to. And if you believe that your management would all of a sudden start violating status quo after unionizing, then you’ve really needed a union way before that. Keep in mind that you are ONE ceo away from having the next JO. Status quo right now is a good thing. Unless you all of a sudden think your management isn’t going to reverse this 10 year trend you reference. Do you want to lock in the declining QOL now while working on actually improving it with the backing of federal law? Or do you prefer looking back ten years from now and thinking you don’t want to lock in that lower QOL?
As for current leadership, political games, self-interests, etc, that can happen at anytime, like right now! With a union, you have by-laws and policies that are written and amended by pilots for the pilots interests. You don’t like leadership? There is a way to deal with that. You don’t like a certain policy or the current structure of the union, there is a way to deal with that. All while not having to answer to another master (management). Pilot unions, like any other democratic organization, is accountable to the membership. It’s always up to members to volunteer for leadership and committee positions, to stay informed, to participate in the democratic process, and to make all members accountable.
There will never be a perfect organization as long as it’s made up by humans or anything made by humans. If you are waiting for perfect, or near perfect, you will be waiting your entire lifetime.
![Nevjets is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post