Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > SkyWest
Did Skywest nearly lose a plane? >

Did Skywest nearly lose a plane?

Search

Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Did Skywest nearly lose a plane?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-09-2015, 05:10 PM
  #1  
Flies With The Hat On
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Right of the Left Seat
Posts: 1,339
Default Did Skywest nearly lose a plane?

Skywest basically threw their entire fuel savings policy out the window. What happened?

A Bumpier, Lower Ride for SkyWest

A Bumpier, Lower Ride for SkyWest
By Seth Miller July 6, 2015
By: Seth Miller / Published July 6, 2015

Regional airline SkyWest is flying a bit lower these days. The carrier has “capped” operations for its CRJ-200 aircraft at 28,000 feet and the larger –700/-900 variants at 35,000 feet as of late June. The move is, according to some, a new “company policy,” while other sources are suggesting it is a restriction imposed by the FAA related to pilot training issues and recent incidents at higher altitudes. The new “policy” was put in place on June 22, and also establishes minimum speeds for the flights. A reported copy of the letter sent to pilots suggests that “strict monitoring will be accomplished by our OCC and the FAA.”

And, perhaps most bizarre, is that the company pilots are not talking (publicly) about the situation at all. One ATC controller noted that the SkyWest Chief Pilot is refusing to discuss the situation with controllers, though the ATC group was provided a “written note that they are operationally restricted.” Still, when ATC is offering higher altitudes more commonly used by the aircraft, SkyWest pilots are declining them, choosing to stay at the lower, less ideal flight levels.

SkyWest operates more than 1,800 average daily departures for United Airlines, American Airlines, US Airways, Delta Air Lines and Alaska Airlines. Thus far the impact on operations seems to be mostly a fuel efficiency one; flight times are not changing. But the reduced efficiency can have a significant impact on fuel burn and capacity. And with higher summer temperatures, as well as higher demand, the reduced efficiency may eventually have real repercussions for passengers. On some of the longer CRJ-200 routes out of Denver, for example, weight restrictions may come into play with the “hot & high” departure conditions and the lower altitude cap reducing the available range. The restrictions are also likely to impact passengers as it limits the ability of pilots to fly over bad weather. And with summer storms, caused or exacerbated by the hot weather, that’s not likely to be much fun for those on board.

And then there’s the question of why this change has been implemented. SkyWest is not doing this to save money operating its flights, which means it is likely tied to safety or regulatory concerns. That has to be slightly troubling as a customer, especially with the carrier remaining tight-lipped on the issue so far. No public reports of issues, either, but a lot of rumblings and insinuation out there. Combined with the company action it does not look especially positive.
flybywire44 is offline  
Old 07-09-2015, 05:55 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
prex8390's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,147
Default

So much for having the hardest interview in the regionals. I know a few that got taken on that wouldn't have 2 years ago.
prex8390 is offline  
Old 07-09-2015, 06:07 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 611
Default

Gee...an article that links to this very website as its "source" of information. It's like the paradoxical loop of suck.
NVUS is offline  
Old 07-09-2015, 06:11 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,935
Default

Really another thread about this.
Riverside is offline  
Old 07-09-2015, 06:40 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: I pilot
Posts: 2,049
Default

No, Skywest didn't nearly lose an airplane. Also, there is already a thread on this.
zondaracer is offline  
Old 07-09-2015, 06:44 PM
  #6  
Line Holder
 
Alex14's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Position: OO
Posts: 80
Default

Yes, this has been discussed extensively in a previous thread. Besides, the article is already outdated as SkyWest 200s can now go up to FL330.
Alex14 is offline  
Old 07-09-2015, 06:47 PM
  #7  
Line Holder
 
Alex14's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Position: OO
Posts: 80
Default

Originally Posted by prex8390
So much for having the hardest interview in the regionals. I know a few that got taken on that wouldn't have 2 years ago.
Couldn't this be said for almost every regional that's struggling to meet their hiring demands?
Alex14 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rev4life03
Hangar Talk
0
03-18-2010 10:00 AM
Jughead
Hangar Talk
4
03-17-2010 07:33 PM
Past V1
Regional
64
04-28-2008 03:04 PM
Ellen
Regional
193
09-21-2007 06:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices