Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > SkyWest
Skywest gets pay raise without ALPA >

Skywest gets pay raise without ALPA

Search

Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Skywest gets pay raise without ALPA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-12-2014, 06:41 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Redbird611's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 544
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
It's called WHIPSAW. Skywest gets a raise just as ExpressJet is asked to take concessions. Skywest pilots are pawns just as much as XE pilots.
I don't think you know how whipsaw really works. In a true whipsaw scenario SkyWest would face pay CUTS following our concessionary TA. SkyWest pay raises don't exactly fit the traditional whipsaw pattern. However, theoretically the aircraft freeze changes represent a cost advantage that equals or exceeds the value of the pay raises, according to ALPA evaluation anyway.
Redbird611 is offline  
Old 01-12-2014, 07:02 PM
  #12  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by Redbird611
I don't think you know how whipsaw really works. In a true whipsaw scenario SkyWest would face pay CUTS following our concessionary TA. SkyWest pay raises don't exactly fit the traditional whipsaw pattern. However, theoretically the aircraft freeze changes represent a cost advantage that equals or exceeds the value of the pay raises, according to ALPA evaluation anyway.
I understand what whipsaw is. I lived it.

Is the Skywest pilots agreement cheaper than the current ExpressJet contract? And if an aircraft freeze change savings equal or exceeds the pay raises, then wouldn't Skywest still be cheaper? And doesn't that provide management an ability to threaten transferring flying?

You don't want two unhappy groups when it comes to whipsaw. So you get ExpressJet to take cuts, then you can cut Skywest pay. You can't cut Skywest pay before you cut ExpressJet pay.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 01-12-2014, 07:18 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Redbird611's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 544
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Is the Skywest pilots agreement cheaper than the current ExpressJet contract?
Yes

Originally Posted by johnso29
And if an aircraft freeze change savings equal or exceeds the pay raises, then wouldn't Skywest still be cheaper? And doesn't that provide management an ability to threaten transferring flying?
Yes, but neither the XJT TA nor the SKYW offer change that.

Originally Posted by johnso29
You don't want two unhappy groups when it comes to whipsaw. So you get ExpressJet to take cuts, then you can cut Skywest pay. You can't cut Skywest pay before you cut ExpressJet pay.
Okay, but the cuts to ExpressJet don't take us below SkyWest costs. We would still be significantly more expensive under the TA than SkyWest, so how exactly would Inc be able to credibly whipsaw SkyWest into lower pay? They'd know that there is no threat of aircraft transfer to ExpressJet. If they intend to further turn the screws on ExpressJet why is the current TA offer above SkyWest compensation?

Last edited by Redbird611; 01-12-2014 at 07:19 PM. Reason: Spelling, quote code
Redbird611 is offline  
Old 01-12-2014, 07:23 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 197
Default

Originally Posted by flapshalfspeed
Just thought I'd point out that Skywest just negotiated a pay raise, and there are no signs they'll be losing out on any of their 76-seat feed or EJet orders as a consequence.

Contrast that with Endeavor/Pinnacle, PSA, and add to that list Eagle--all ALPA represented regionals--all of which have taken huge paycuts just to maintain their existing flying (or marginally increase it).

Statistically speaking, if you are a regional airline pilot, it's becoming very difficult to argue that ALPA representation provides a substantive benefit to regional members. While correlation is not causation, I would argue that ALPA representation negatively affects regional airline pilots by placing them under the same umbrella as mainline MECs/national leadership, whose interests often run counter to the career interests of regional pilots.

Just two cents I figured I'd throw out there for discussion/consideration.
Horizon pilots received a pay raise without ALPA, they did it with a union though. QX pay rates are still higher then Skywest, and that is with better insurance, flight benefits, profit sharing (PBP), and retirement benefits. It is easy to ignore the facts to believe in your own version of reality. At the end of the day your "contract" that is to be voted on is as much of a legal document as toilet paper is. It can and will be flushed down the toilet at the will of skywest holdings. I dont agree with ALPA's or the IBT's actions over the last 10 years, but skywest holdings is the largest regional in the world, and their pilots should be united in their effort to further the profession. The revenue generated by your flying is much greater then the CPA agreements pay, and some day the Legacies will have to share more of the revenue, or bring the flying back in house. Unless you want to be paid B scale wages for the rest of your career.
TheTransporter is offline  
Old 01-12-2014, 07:31 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Redbird611's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 544
Default

Originally Posted by CaptKrunch
Psa didn't take a HUGE pay cut. They took a pay cap 12capt/4Fo with a $1 a hour raise when the 30 CRJ's are delivered. 30 CRJ's which isn't a "marginal" increase. It's a 60% increase in fleet size. This was a **** deal but if your going to call us out for voting in this crap please at least have your facts strait.
Are you kidding me? The 12/4 cap with pay freezes if declined a position with AA is a massive, massive concession. That is an industry shattering change that might have been resisted if it was just 9E in bankruptcy, but PSA validated that as a new industry norm voluntarily. PSA was not in imminent financial distress. Those CRJ's don't represent a 60% fleet increase because the 50-seaters are going to go away. PSA pilots sold out their peers for a chance at career advancement, pure and simple.
Redbird611 is offline  
Old 01-13-2014, 06:49 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CaptKrunch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: LeftSeat PA-44
Posts: 528
Default

Originally Posted by CaptKrunch
Psa didn't take a HUGE pay cut. They took a pay cap 12capt/4Fo with a $1 a hour raise when the 30 CRJ's are delivered. 30 CRJ's which isn't a "marginal" increase. It's a 60% increase in fleet size. This was a **** deal but if your going to call us out for voting in this crap please at least have your facts strait.
Are you kidding me? The 12/4 cap with pay freezes if declined a position with AA is a massive, massive concession. That is an industry shattering change that might have been resisted if it was just 9E in bankruptcy, but PSA validated that as a new industry norm voluntarily. PSA was not in imminent financial distress. Those CRJ's don't represent a 60% fleet increase because the 50-seaters are going to go away. PSA pilots sold out their peers for a chance at career advancement, pure and simple.
Funny how I never said we didn't give concessions. I said it wasn't a HUGE pay cut. Second we haven't had any indication from the company that the 200's are going away before the leases run up in 2019. In fact we have been told they are staying. Even if they DO go away our fleet size will remain relatively the same but due to our pay being a blend between 200 and 700/900 everyone's pay would go up. Lastly you don't know PSA's financial status because Us Air keeps it hidden. We are nothing but a line item. We are told one year we are a huge money maker and the next that we are a huge drain. It all depends on what Doug wants the creditors to see. I have no problem being called out for voting in a bad deal. But again use facts not opinion or emotional arguments.
CaptKrunch is offline  
Old 01-13-2014, 07:01 AM
  #17  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default

Originally Posted by CaptKrunch
Psa didn't take a HUGE pay cut. They took a pay cap 12capt/4Fo with a $1 a hour raise when the 30 CRJ's are delivered. 30 CRJ's which isn't a "marginal" increase. It's a 60% increase in fleet size. This was a **** deal but if your going to call us out for voting in this crap please at least have your facts strait.
Doesn't your share of premiums also go up? That's a huge concession!

Originally Posted by Redbird611
Quote:





Originally Posted by johnso29


Is the Skywest pilots agreement cheaper than the current ExpressJet contract?




Yes


Quote:





Originally Posted by johnso29


And if an aircraft freeze change savings equal or exceeds the pay raises, then wouldn't Skywest still be cheaper? And doesn't that provide management an ability to threaten transferring flying?




Yes, but neither the XJT TA nor the SKYW offer change that.


Quote:





Originally Posted by johnso29


You don't want two unhappy groups when it comes to whipsaw. So you get ExpressJet to take cuts, then you can cut Skywest pay. You can't cut Skywest pay before you cut ExpressJet pay.




Okay, but the cuts to ExpressJet don't take us below SkyWest costs. We would still be significantly more expensive under the TA than SkyWest, so how exactly would Inc be able to credibly whipsaw SkyWest into lower pay? They'd know that there is no threat of aircraft transfer to ExpressJet. If they intend to further turn the screws on ExpressJet why is the current TA offer above SkyWest compensation?
They fact that the Skywest pay proposal is still below the XJT TA keeps the whipsaw going. As long as one of the airlines is more expensive than the other (doesn't matter which one), they will always play one against the other. The ONLY what to eliminate this whipsaw is with one list. Unfortunately certain people don't want that.
Nevets is offline  
Old 01-13-2014, 07:15 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bonesbrigade's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 352
Default

All things considered I find most SKW pilots to be good people and friendly. I've ridden their jumpseat many times going home and they are always talkative.... better yet, they don't give me any flack for our BK TA like prick Eagle pilots.
bonesbrigade is offline  
Old 01-13-2014, 10:44 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Redbird611's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 544
Default

Originally Posted by CaptKrunch
Funny how I never said we didn't give concessions. I said it wasn't a HUGE pay cut. Second we haven't had any indication from the company that the 200's are going away before the leases run up in 2019. In fact we have been told they are staying.
Oh, so this wasn't about ensuring replacements for 50-seaters, but was rather pilots paying for growth airplanes? That makes the voluntary concessions even worse.
Redbird611 is offline  
Old 01-13-2014, 11:22 AM
  #20  
Not A Janitor
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 814
Default

Originally Posted by Utah
Just for clarification, only about 4-500 out of 3260 pilots are getting a raise. For the other 2800 pilots, were getting around $300-400 for uniforms, medicals, and per diem. It won't even cover the increased cost of health insurance this year.
And the soon-to-be E70/E75 pilots will get all their soft pay at the higher rate. That's a pretty significant gain, especially with so many frames on order, don't you think?
atrdriver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bgmann
Regional
31
11-19-2011 07:33 PM
superduck
Union Talk
420
06-20-2011 10:00 PM
ATCsaidDoWhat
Union Talk
0
09-30-2010 11:49 AM
LivinTheDream28
Regional
92
02-25-2010 03:21 AM
KingAirPIC
Regional
181
01-22-2008 09:54 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices