Skywest gets pay raise without ALPA
#11
I don't think you know how whipsaw really works. In a true whipsaw scenario SkyWest would face pay CUTS following our concessionary TA. SkyWest pay raises don't exactly fit the traditional whipsaw pattern. However, theoretically the aircraft freeze changes represent a cost advantage that equals or exceeds the value of the pay raises, according to ALPA evaluation anyway.
#12
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
I don't think you know how whipsaw really works. In a true whipsaw scenario SkyWest would face pay CUTS following our concessionary TA. SkyWest pay raises don't exactly fit the traditional whipsaw pattern. However, theoretically the aircraft freeze changes represent a cost advantage that equals or exceeds the value of the pay raises, according to ALPA evaluation anyway.
Is the Skywest pilots agreement cheaper than the current ExpressJet contract? And if an aircraft freeze change savings equal or exceeds the pay raises, then wouldn't Skywest still be cheaper? And doesn't that provide management an ability to threaten transferring flying?
You don't want two unhappy groups when it comes to whipsaw. So you get ExpressJet to take cuts, then you can cut Skywest pay. You can't cut Skywest pay before you cut ExpressJet pay.
#13
Okay, but the cuts to ExpressJet don't take us below SkyWest costs. We would still be significantly more expensive under the TA than SkyWest, so how exactly would Inc be able to credibly whipsaw SkyWest into lower pay? They'd know that there is no threat of aircraft transfer to ExpressJet. If they intend to further turn the screws on ExpressJet why is the current TA offer above SkyWest compensation?
Last edited by Redbird611; 01-12-2014 at 07:19 PM. Reason: Spelling, quote code
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 197
Just thought I'd point out that Skywest just negotiated a pay raise, and there are no signs they'll be losing out on any of their 76-seat feed or EJet orders as a consequence.
Contrast that with Endeavor/Pinnacle, PSA, and add to that list Eagle--all ALPA represented regionals--all of which have taken huge paycuts just to maintain their existing flying (or marginally increase it).
Statistically speaking, if you are a regional airline pilot, it's becoming very difficult to argue that ALPA representation provides a substantive benefit to regional members. While correlation is not causation, I would argue that ALPA representation negatively affects regional airline pilots by placing them under the same umbrella as mainline MECs/national leadership, whose interests often run counter to the career interests of regional pilots.
Just two cents I figured I'd throw out there for discussion/consideration.
Contrast that with Endeavor/Pinnacle, PSA, and add to that list Eagle--all ALPA represented regionals--all of which have taken huge paycuts just to maintain their existing flying (or marginally increase it).
Statistically speaking, if you are a regional airline pilot, it's becoming very difficult to argue that ALPA representation provides a substantive benefit to regional members. While correlation is not causation, I would argue that ALPA representation negatively affects regional airline pilots by placing them under the same umbrella as mainline MECs/national leadership, whose interests often run counter to the career interests of regional pilots.
Just two cents I figured I'd throw out there for discussion/consideration.
#15
Psa didn't take a HUGE pay cut. They took a pay cap 12capt/4Fo with a $1 a hour raise when the 30 CRJ's are delivered. 30 CRJ's which isn't a "marginal" increase. It's a 60% increase in fleet size. This was a **** deal but if your going to call us out for voting in this crap please at least have your facts strait.
#16
Psa didn't take a HUGE pay cut. They took a pay cap 12capt/4Fo with a $1 a hour raise when the 30 CRJ's are delivered. 30 CRJ's which isn't a "marginal" increase. It's a 60% increase in fleet size. This was a **** deal but if your going to call us out for voting in this crap please at least have your facts strait.
#17
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Psa didn't take a HUGE pay cut. They took a pay cap 12capt/4Fo with a $1 a hour raise when the 30 CRJ's are delivered. 30 CRJ's which isn't a "marginal" increase. It's a 60% increase in fleet size. This was a **** deal but if your going to call us out for voting in this crap please at least have your facts strait.
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnso29
Is the Skywest pilots agreement cheaper than the current ExpressJet contract?
Yes
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnso29
And if an aircraft freeze change savings equal or exceeds the pay raises, then wouldn't Skywest still be cheaper? And doesn't that provide management an ability to threaten transferring flying?
Yes, but neither the XJT TA nor the SKYW offer change that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnso29
You don't want two unhappy groups when it comes to whipsaw. So you get ExpressJet to take cuts, then you can cut Skywest pay. You can't cut Skywest pay before you cut ExpressJet pay.
Okay, but the cuts to ExpressJet don't take us below SkyWest costs. We would still be significantly more expensive under the TA than SkyWest, so how exactly would Inc be able to credibly whipsaw SkyWest into lower pay? They'd know that there is no threat of aircraft transfer to ExpressJet. If they intend to further turn the screws on ExpressJet why is the current TA offer above SkyWest compensation?
Originally Posted by johnso29
Is the Skywest pilots agreement cheaper than the current ExpressJet contract?
Yes
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnso29
And if an aircraft freeze change savings equal or exceeds the pay raises, then wouldn't Skywest still be cheaper? And doesn't that provide management an ability to threaten transferring flying?
Yes, but neither the XJT TA nor the SKYW offer change that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnso29
You don't want two unhappy groups when it comes to whipsaw. So you get ExpressJet to take cuts, then you can cut Skywest pay. You can't cut Skywest pay before you cut ExpressJet pay.
Okay, but the cuts to ExpressJet don't take us below SkyWest costs. We would still be significantly more expensive under the TA than SkyWest, so how exactly would Inc be able to credibly whipsaw SkyWest into lower pay? They'd know that there is no threat of aircraft transfer to ExpressJet. If they intend to further turn the screws on ExpressJet why is the current TA offer above SkyWest compensation?
#18
All things considered I find most SKW pilots to be good people and friendly. I've ridden their jumpseat many times going home and they are always talkative.... better yet, they don't give me any flack for our BK TA like prick Eagle pilots.
#19
Oh, so this wasn't about ensuring replacements for 50-seaters, but was rather pilots paying for growth airplanes? That makes the voluntary concessions even worse.
#20
Not A Janitor
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 814
And the soon-to-be E70/E75 pilots will get all their soft pay at the higher rate. That's a pretty significant gain, especially with so many frames on order, don't you think?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post