Skywest or Eagle
#62
Higher priced!!! SKW, ASA, EXJ, Pinnacle, Airwisky and RAH all have senior pilot groups... Stop buying into this whole senior crap! The airlines I just mentioned compose close to 75% of the regional feed! The Transtates Holdings regionals have lower longevity because they haven't been around that long but as a whole we are compared to those two regionals and told how expensive we are, stop that mentality.
It sounds like you're one of those pilots who think our cost to the bottom line doesn't change overtime, please don’t be that fool. The number one cost to an airline is fuel, number 2 is labor of which we are their highest paid labor group so since mainline picks up the tab for fuel it stands to reason that labor is number 1 to our airline. Keep in mind we are no longer “regional airlines,” we are “contract carriers” and in an industry where mainline wants cheap reliable feed every penny matters.
Last edited by MatchPoint; 11-29-2012 at 07:37 PM.
#64
Easy buddy, no need to pop a blood vessel. A 12th year CA makes more than a 6th year CA, that’s simple math, and a first year FO makes less than a 6th year FO. Now how Eagle stacks up against its competitors like SKW is another discussion and is a comparison I never mentioned, regardless I’m certain that when it comes to labor cost both airlines are pretty close to each other. Where SkyWest saves money is in "other" areas and those savings decrease our overall cost. Yes we have a higher CASM than some, that’s why we lost 12 CR7’s to GoJet about 2 years ago, but our "others" is what enabled us to gain our Alaska, US & AA flying within that same period. However removing 800+ CA’s form the top of your list will reduce your cost thus making you a bit more competitive (meaning you were never not competitive but after 800+ on top leave you will be more so than before).
It sounds like you're one of those pilots who think our cost to the bottom line doesn't change overtime, please don’t be that fool. The number one cost to an airline is fuel, number 2 is labor of which we are their highest paid labor group so since mainline picks up the tab for fuel it stands to reason that labor is number 1 to our airline. Keep in mind we are no longer “regional airlines,” we are “contract carriers” and in an industry where mainline wants cheap reliable feed every penny matters.
It sounds like you're one of those pilots who think our cost to the bottom line doesn't change overtime, please don’t be that fool. The number one cost to an airline is fuel, number 2 is labor of which we are their highest paid labor group so since mainline picks up the tab for fuel it stands to reason that labor is number 1 to our airline. Keep in mind we are no longer “regional airlines,” we are “contract carriers” and in an industry where mainline wants cheap reliable feed every penny matters.
#65
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
the only carriers eagle was compared to (with alpa's blessing) by management was Pinnacle and either TSA or MESA. No one else, so the comparison was rigged.
basically the union leaders lied and kept secret. The info came out in the Pinnacle BK by a lawyer who represents both Pinnacle and Eagle management in BK.
Company got the cuts it wanted and now the outsourcing of the AE feed to AA has begun and increasing. More outsourcing of AE feed coming this month.
So yeah come on to AE and find out what furlough is like.
basically the union leaders lied and kept secret. The info came out in the Pinnacle BK by a lawyer who represents both Pinnacle and Eagle management in BK.
Company got the cuts it wanted and now the outsourcing of the AE feed to AA has begun and increasing. More outsourcing of AE feed coming this month.
So yeah come on to AE and find out what furlough is like.
#67
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
just want to point out one other item of cost that has never been mentioned by management or our mec reps at eagle. that is the cost of our dumb management team. eagle has at least twice as many managers, directors and vp's than any other regional. now these people who actually generate no income for the company, there cost are overlooked by everyone.
if eagle got rid of half the managers, directors and vp's and combined there separate deppartments accordingly, ae would be cost effective with anyone.
last time aa was fat and got rid of managers (for show) they all found jobs at eagle within the new departments that developed for them.
eagles costs, no-one knows because there are no books to look at. eagle is a private entity within a public corporation part of the airline division. there are no financial numbers published by eagle, just load factors and capacity. so the true cost of ae no-one knows.
but if you want to be on reserve for life or furloughed, please come to eagle. you know the company that advertises, divestiture, uncertainty of future, and the continous to the loss of feed for aa to other regionals. yeap, come on down.
eagle is loosing feed and no way to gain new feed contracts. eagle is contracting like someone who is anorexic.
if eagle got rid of half the managers, directors and vp's and combined there separate deppartments accordingly, ae would be cost effective with anyone.
last time aa was fat and got rid of managers (for show) they all found jobs at eagle within the new departments that developed for them.
eagles costs, no-one knows because there are no books to look at. eagle is a private entity within a public corporation part of the airline division. there are no financial numbers published by eagle, just load factors and capacity. so the true cost of ae no-one knows.
but if you want to be on reserve for life or furloughed, please come to eagle. you know the company that advertises, divestiture, uncertainty of future, and the continous to the loss of feed for aa to other regionals. yeap, come on down.
eagle is loosing feed and no way to gain new feed contracts. eagle is contracting like someone who is anorexic.
#69
Banned
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 1,071
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post