Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > SkyWest
Skywest Awarded 34 New 700/900s >

Skywest Awarded 34 New 700/900s

Search

Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Skywest Awarded 34 New 700/900s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-02-2012, 12:11 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Red97Vette's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: UniCal 737 FO
Posts: 413
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
Red97Vette

I'm sure calling the people you would like to work for "scumbags" will greatly increase your odds of not working there. Beware of your words, they shape your actions, beware of your actions, they shape your character.

It still amazing, DL takes back some measure of scope and the inevitable outcome is now hated by those that hoped for it.

GF
So if you worked at CA the past 10 years, after the strike, and you are also wholly owned by DAL you wouldn't think DAL management were scum bags for just shutting the doors and kicking you out in the street?

That's fine they are taking the flying back, I'm not against that, just kicking out the guys you "own" out with nothing is a bit dirty.
Red97Vette is offline  
Old 08-02-2012, 12:46 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: 320
Posts: 709
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
Red97Vette

I'm sure calling the people you would like to work for "scumbags" will greatly increase your odds of not working there. Beware of your words, they shape your actions, beware of your actions, they shape your character.

It still amazing, DL takes back some measure of scope and the inevitable outcome is now hated by those that hoped for it.

GF
It is because people wanted delta to take planes from other companies to take back scope. Everyone cheers for what is best for the industry until it affects them.
tom14cat14 is offline  
Old 08-02-2012, 12:47 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Posts: 566
Default

How senior is LAX at Skywest lately? How long for a new hire?
9easy is offline  
Old 08-02-2012, 02:00 PM
  #44  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Posts: 3,655
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
Red97Vette

I'm sure calling the people you would like to work for "scumbags" will greatly increase your odds of not working there. Beware of your words, they shape your actions, beware of your actions, they shape your character.

It still amazing, DL takes back some measure of scope and the inevitable outcome is now hated by those that hoped for it.

GF
Totally agree, your attitude will leak through, either in your acquaintances or actions. Taking back scope will, even this little bit, engenders anger from the regional pilots. Imagine the anger from the major ALPA when scope was exploding at their expense and furlough. Regionals were never designed to be a career and those who put their eggs into that career level are bound to be disappointed eventually on the next RFI.
full of luv is offline  
Old 08-02-2012, 02:21 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,150
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Delta has to cut 218 CRJ-200s. Current 343 - 125 allowed = 218 cuts.

Pinnacle will most likely lose all 141 CRJ-200s from 2013-2015.
This is correct.

218 to cut as outlined by Delta press releases.

218-66 from Skywest family = 152

152 - 16 from Comair = 136 remain to be removed by 2015.

Funny how Pinnacle has 141. Sure doesn't look good for them since 1.) the all the CRJ200 leases belong to Delta.
And
2.) the press releases indicated 2 for 1 lease returns leading to 70 new CRJ 900's.
And
3.) pinnacle in bankruptcy, unless they get their costs down to the G7 level, Delta will place these new aircraft (that they will "own" the leases on) to the lowest bidder.

Good luck guys
Geardownflaps30 is offline  
Old 08-02-2012, 02:31 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 273
Default

We all make our decisions where to work. Everybody hates on Go-jets but is Sky Pest any different. I will always welcome a jump seater from either airline because at this point it looks like I will be working at one of the two but I don't respect what there pilot groups are doing to the industry.
Will is offline  
Old 08-02-2012, 02:42 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
mooney's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: CL-65 captain
Posts: 2,244
Default

hold on.....gotta butter my popcorn...
mooney is offline  
Old 08-02-2012, 02:45 PM
  #48  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,091
Default

Originally Posted by Will
We all make our decisions where to work. Everybody hates on Go-jets but is Sky Pest any different. I will always welcome a jump seater from either airline because at this point it looks like I will be working at one of the two but I don't respect what there pilot groups are doing to the industry.

Let's call a spade a spade here...

In this particular case, SKW and gojet are not the same animal.

Gojet is getting awarded new jets because they are cheapest, ie bottom feeders. You could hold their pilot group responsible for that.

SKW got new jets only because Inc had 66 200's on long-term lease that they were willing to trade with DAL 2-for-1 for larger jets. This was a 100% management deal on both sides, had nothing to do with pilots or labor costs. DAL gets to unload 66 200's early and SKW gets to keep 30 instead of loosing them all like they would in a RFP. As SKW management constantly reminds us, we are not cost-competitive in this industry (and getting less so every day).

Ultimately OH was terminated because of a decade-long blood-feud with DAL management. DAL probably would have given the flying to somebody else even if OH had the cheapest labor...they simply don't want regional labor under their roof, too much opportunity to make trouble.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 08-02-2012, 02:47 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: 320
Posts: 709
Default

Originally Posted by Will
We all make our decisions where to work. Everybody hates on Go-jets but is Sky Pest any different. I will always welcome a jump seater from either airline because at this point it looks like I will be working at one of the two but I don't respect what there pilot groups are doing to the industry.
We really can not put skywest in the same category as go jets because they pay better then our company does. (If i remember you are former XJ) I know a lot of Mesaba guys are mad at skywest because they came into MSP and pushed a lot of us out but that is not the same as what go jets is doing to the industry.
tom14cat14 is offline  
Old 08-02-2012, 03:08 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 273
Default

Pay is huge but that is only a fraction of the costs of a pilot contract. Work rules, retirement, insurance, training rules, all make up pilot costs which raise the price of the compensation for each pilot. All of that we have is because of ALPA and Comair pilots paved the way. Like it or not they took stand which in time was their demise. Like I said I will never treat a fellow pilot bad, but that doesn't mean I have to respect the whole pilot group.
Will is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ghilis101
SkyWest
72
06-11-2019 03:53 PM
dontsurf
Regional
75
06-02-2008 07:06 PM
JoeyMeatballs
Regional
160
04-28-2008 06:45 PM
Past V1
Regional
64
04-28-2008 03:04 PM
iahflyr
Regional
48
02-14-2008 01:36 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices