Search

Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Skywest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-25-2014, 11:14 AM
  #7801  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 802
Default

Originally Posted by pete2800
The Alaska Airlines pilots have no scope clause at all. Last time they voted in favor of a 10% pay increase rather than any sort of scope protection.

Before you arrange the facts the way you see it, you might want to include that the Alaska pilots decided between furlough protection in a merger or scope. They chose merger protection as it was very likely they would be purchased and getting both wasn't possible.
Check Complete is offline  
Old 11-25-2014, 11:30 AM
  #7802  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 197
Default

Originally Posted by Check Complete
Before you arrange the facts the way you see it, you might want to include that the Alaska pilots decided between furlough protection in a merger or scope. They chose merger protection as it was very likely they would be purchased and getting both wasn't possible.
Which one was more likely?
TheTransporter is offline  
Old 11-25-2014, 12:46 PM
  #7803  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Posts: 524
Default

Originally Posted by mobius27
Hope we get more GFK overnights, I need some parrot's cay wings!
Never thought I would see a wish for a GFK overnight. Ever. But the Cay cannot be denied.
gearcrankr is offline  
Old 11-25-2014, 05:50 PM
  #7804  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2013
Posts: 196
Default

While I like to see mainline flying, it is my opinion the northwest cities to places like stl, okc, MKE would never see a 737 anyway. Too thin of routes. This is mainline flying true, but mainline flying that really couldnt really be profitable, i.e. Not happening.
Now I'd be for Alaska flying the 175s themselves.
8ballfreight is offline  
Old 11-25-2014, 06:05 PM
  #7805  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 197
Default

Originally Posted by 8ballfreight
While I like to see mainline flying, it is my opinion the northwest cities to places like stl, okc, MKE would never see a 737 anyway. Too thin of routes. This is mainline flying true, but mainline flying that really couldnt really be profitable, i.e. Not happening.
Now I'd be for Alaska flying the 175s themselves.
Lay off the 8ball, Alaska already flies 737 SEA to many Midwest cities, including STL.
TheTransporter is offline  
Old 11-25-2014, 10:00 PM
  #7806  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: Another RJ FO
Posts: 1,272
Default

Originally Posted by TheTransporter
Lay off the 8ball, Alaska already flies 737 SEA to many Midwest cities, including STL.
And clearly doing so on a 737 isn't full enough or profitable enough for them to continue since they're contracting it out. I can respect that there are routes that are better served by RJ sized planes. I think most people just wish that mainline pilots would fly the E175s and not regional pilots.
rcfd13 is offline  
Old 11-26-2014, 06:18 AM
  #7807  
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,210
Default

Originally Posted by rcfd13
And clearly doing so on a 737 isn't full enough or profitable enough for them to continue since they're contracting it out. I can respect that there are routes that are better served by RJ sized planes. I think most people just wish that mainline pilots would fly the E175s and not regional pilots.
Correct. Hence the scope clause debacle.

Originally Posted by Check Complete
Before you arrange the facts the way you see it, you might want to include that the Alaska pilots decided between furlough protection in a merger or scope. They chose merger protection as it was very likely they would be purchased and getting both wasn't possible.
They chose the 10% pay raise that management dangled out there like bait. Hook, line, sinker.
pete2800 is offline  
Old 11-26-2014, 07:51 AM
  #7808  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 197
Default

Originally Posted by rcfd13
And clearly doing so on a 737 isn't full enough or profitable enough for them to continue since they're contracting it out. I can respect that there are routes that are better served by RJ sized planes. I think most people just wish that mainline pilots would fly the E175s and not regional pilots.
None of their current flying is being contracted out. All the Midwest flights are full. Those three routes are new.
TheTransporter is offline  
Old 11-27-2014, 10:57 AM
  #7809  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CassinAK's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: Captain
Posts: 327
Default

Originally Posted by pete2800
Correct. Hence the scope clause debacle.


They chose the 10% pay raise that management dangled out there like bait. Hook, line, sinker.
Actually it was a 19.83% pay raise that they dangled.... And merger/furlough protection. The reason the more senior pilots are more concerned with merger protection than scope is because they still have their pension. They are more concerned with protecting their pension than protecting flying. Hopefully as the list changes to more of us without a pension we will be able to change the mentality of the pilot group and better protect our flying.
CassinAK is offline  
Old 11-29-2014, 11:53 AM
  #7810  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Posts: 613
Default

I really try to think of myself as a positive person. I enjoy going to work, get along with my crews, and generally have a positive outlook on life. But lately I have been stewing about all this crap going on and I keep wondering when enough will be enough for SkyWest pilots.
Each month we see our bids get jacked to high heaven. It has finally got bad enough that it has worked itself up the ranks to the senior people dropping off and giving them PN's and CN's. I have dealt for years with PBS dropping off 3 day pairings and awarding me 4 days due to "line constraints" So I would have to work 3 or 4 more days away from home so PBS could give me an extra 5 hours of work. We all know it's because our pairing suck, so when will we get some oversight to the pairings that are being created? What do we need to do to get that oversight?
Now I was a no vote last year. I saw that the Bro was going away, and that we should have got more for the E-175 rate or something better for everybody in the last pay package. Unfortunately, I was in the minority but everyone was so excited that it was only a year "contract" and we could negotiate something more when terms were more favorable.
So now here we are, with companies offering 30K for people to stick around, flying that is being farmed out to other regionals because they can't staff it, problems filling classes and yet we have suspended our pay talks?? Nobody thought that we should have a provision to fall back to a COLA of 2% if an agreement can't be reached? What is the urgency for the company to come back to the table? We can't strike. Hell, we can't do much of anything because we don't have the protections that most of the other airlines have.

This is my first airline gig. I got to the party later in life, but I wanted to work at SkyWest because they were a good company with good employees. I didn't realize how important a union was until I was already on property. I used to think we didn't need a union, but I just wish everyone could open their eyes and see what has happened to this once proud company over the past 8 years. Yeah, I still think we have it better than most. But my biggest fear is that by the time everyone realizes how bad it can get, it will be way too late.
I guess I just need to quit pining about how good it could be and just waste less time on the forums and more time getting my app updated.
disillusioned is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ghilis101
SkyWest
72
06-11-2019 03:53 PM
Lbell911
SkyWest
16
04-19-2015 08:19 AM
Splanky
Regional
47
01-28-2011 07:59 AM
Jack Bauer
Regional
25
11-01-2008 02:29 PM
geshields
Major
2
08-16-2005 03:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices